Microsoft ----+
               |
You --->   <--+

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

>> What the hell is a jigawhatt/endofunctor.
> 
> It's a measure of time travelling through monads.

Monads may let you borrow the future, but you MUST NOT come face to face 
with your future self. Why, it could cause a temporal paradox that could 
UNRAVEL THE VERY FABRIC OF THE SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM!

Alternatively, maybe the damage would be limited to only locking up one 
CPU core until somebody sends a SIGKILL...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

Le_Forgeron <jgr### [at] freefr> wrote:
> http://www.tijuana.fr/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/windows-mac-linux.jpg

  That has been clearly changed to French. I wonder where the original one
at that full resolution is.

  But the full resolution version does convey the idea better.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message

On 20-1-2010 17:23, nemesis wrote:
> may I have a funny interlude between another set of bashing?

sure

> http://kvardek-du.kerno.org/2010/01/how-common-lisp-programmer-views-users.html 

but this isn't it. At least I did not find it even remotely funny or 
interesting.

Post a reply to this message

andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> > http://kvardek-du.kerno.org/2010/01/how-common-lisp-programmer-views-users.html 

> but this isn't it. At least I did not find it even remotely funny or 
> interesting.

  Why do I not find that surprising?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message

andrel wrote:
> but this isn't it. At least I did not find it even remotely funny or 
> interesting.

we clearly have opposite sense of humor.  Post some sad news that I may 
give a laugh.

Post a reply to this message

On 20-1-2010 23:29, Warp wrote:
> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>>> http://kvardek-du.kerno.org/2010/01/how-common-lisp-programmer-views-users.html 
> 
>> but this isn't it. At least I did not find it even remotely funny or 
>> interesting.
> 
>   Why do I not find that surprising?
> 
I don't know

Post a reply to this message

andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> On 20-1-2010 23:29, Warp wrote:
> > andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> >>> http://kvardek-du.kerno.org/2010/01/how-common-lisp-programmer-views-users.html
> >
> >> but this isn't it. At least I did not find it even remotely funny or
> >> interesting.
> >
> >   Why do I not find that surprising?
> >
> I don't know

now that was funny! :D

Post a reply to this message

On 21-1-2010 21:46, nemesis wrote:
> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>> On 20-1-2010 23:29, Warp wrote:
>>> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>>>>> http://kvardek-du.kerno.org/2010/01/how-common-lisp-programmer-views-users.html
>>>> but this isn't it. At least I did not find it even remotely funny or
>>>> interesting.
>>>   Why do I not find that surprising?
>>>
>> I don't know
> 
> now that was funny! :D
> 
Huh why?

Post a reply to this message

andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> On 21-1-2010 21:46, nemesis wrote:
> > andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> >> On 20-1-2010 23:29, Warp wrote:
> >>> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> >>>>>
http://kvardek-du.kerno.org/2010/01/how-common-lisp-programmer-views-users.html
> >>>> but this isn't it. At least I did not find it even remotely funny or
> >>>> interesting.
> >>>   Why do I not find that surprising?
> >>>
> >> I don't know
> >
> > now that was funny! :D
> >
> Huh why?

an abrupt punch-line for a rhetoric question.

Post a reply to this message