 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Darren New wrote:
> In other news, both feathers and hammers fall at the same speed in
> airless conditions.
Just once, I'd like to verify this experimentally...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> Do you call that an argument? LOL
>
> No, I call that a partly definition.
>
:D
>> From my memory of mechanics at school, hp was more an advertising unit ;)
>> Bloody farmers couldn’t tell an erg from an egg :-)
>
> Hp can be misleading, since it can mean lots of different hp's. It can
> be either SAE or DIN and from the crankshaft or from the tires etc.
>
Well I probably don’t think of hp as being anything as other than what
non-technical people say. Who knows what work a horse can do nowadays?
If the health and safety or animal welfare people allow it ;)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Just once, I'd like to verify this experimentally...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5_dOEyAfk
Of course, it wouldn't be *that* hard to do on earth.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>> Just once, I'd like to verify this experimentally...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5_dOEyAfk
So much for "they did it on a soundstage and slowed it down". :-P
> Of course, it wouldn't be *that* hard to do on earth.
Yeah, because a high vacuum is easy to come by. Oh, wait...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Darren New wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> Just once, I'd like to verify this experimentally...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5_dOEyAfk
>
> Of course, it wouldn't be *that* hard to do on earth.
>
I've seen a demo of this in a few science museums. It's pretty nifty,
but in the vacuum they both fall fast enough that you don't really get
to look at it for long.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Yeah, because a high vacuum is easy to come by. Oh, wait...
Well, yeah, it is. It's called a bell jar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XJcZ-KoL9o
(Note - the next video after the one I posted.)
You can go to edmond's scientific and buy bottles of vacuum for like a
quarter each, too. It's not like you need interstellar-space vacuum to
prove the point.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>> Yeah, because a high vacuum is easy to come by. Oh, wait...
>
> Well, yeah, it is. It's called a bell jar.
You'd need a pretty damned big bell jar to drop an object any
significant distance.
> You can go to edmond's scientific and buy bottles of vacuum for like a
> quarter each, too.
Really?
The London Science Museum has a bell inside a jar with a vacuum pump.
But last I checked, a pump powerful enough to create anything you could
describe as "a vacuum" is an extremely expensive piece of scientific
equipment.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Stephen wrote:
>
> Well I probably don’t think of hp as being anything as other than what
> non-technical people say. Who knows what work a horse can do nowadays?
> If the health and safety or animal welfare people allow it ;)
>
In that, my friend, you are absolutely right.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible wrote:
> You'd need a pretty damned big bell jar to drop an object any
> significant distance.
Somewhat larger than the distance it takes to see a feather and a ball
bearing falling at different speeds in atmosphere.
>> You can go to edmond's scientific and buy bottles of vacuum for like a
>> quarter each, too.
>
> Really?
Yes. Ever get blood drawn? How do you think that works?
> But last I checked, a pump powerful enough to create anything you could
> describe as "a vacuum" is an extremely expensive piece of scientific
> equipment.
http://www.google.com/products?q=vacuum+pumps+for+sale
Even the $25 pump gets you down to 29" of vacuum.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> Yes. Ever get blood drawn? How do you think that works?
Presumably they just use a syringe. I wasn't looking at the time; I was
in far too much pain...
>> But last I checked, a pump powerful enough to create anything you
>> could describe as "a vacuum" is an extremely expensive piece of
>> scientific equipment.
>
> http://www.google.com/products?q=vacuum+pumps+for+sale
>
> Even the $25 pump gets you down to 29" of vacuum.
Interesting. I wonder what it costs to buy a large container than can
withstand several thousand Newtons of force trying to crush it...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |