|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
So when I have a bootble USB stick inserted, my BIOS still gives a F***;
it doesn't even pop up the boot device selection menu when I press the
key during POST that should bring up the menu; it still boots from the
hard disk. Even if I tell it to /do/ boot from USB, and /never ever/ try
booting from hard disk.
Unless I insert some CD. It doesn't even seem relevant /what/ CD. It
doesn't even seem to get accessed. Possibly one of those transparent
plastic dummies you frequently find at the bottom of CD-R cakeboxes
would do...
*WTF?!*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I would bet on a "not yet implemented feature". Try to update the BIOS
to the latest version.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Saul Luizaga wrote:
> I would bet on a "not yet implemented feature". Try to update the BIOS
> to the latest version.
I would laugh, but...
I bought a motherboard. It says in the box, in big red letters, that it
has a SATA RAID function, and a Dual BIOS function. But after hours of
trying, neither of these features actually work!
Updated to the latest BIOS version, and suddenly both of these features
work perfectly.
In other words, the product in the box does not possess the features
they claim it possesses. WTF?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> I would laugh, but...
>
> I bought a motherboard. It says in the box, in big red letters, that it
> has a SATA RAID function, and a Dual BIOS function. But after hours of
> trying, neither of these features actually work!
>
> Updated to the latest BIOS version, and suddenly both of these features
> work perfectly.
>
> In other words, the product in the box does not possess the features
> they claim it possesses. WTF?
Sometimes, to meet dead lines I suppose, Manufacturer launch products
that will require later download software update and/or firmware upgrade.
Also, sometimes a product model has 2 or more sub-models (you can see
"missing" components on the circuit board) which can work with common
drivers/firmware/BIOS then you have to make an update/upgrade for a
model with some extra features.
If you were a PC Tech, this wouldn't be a WTF :-) it happens all the
time. Well at least has an easy and fast solution which is what it
counts to be a practical product.
Cheers.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> In other words, the product in the box does not possess the features
>> they claim it possesses. WTF?
>
> Sometimes, to meet dead lines I suppose, Manufacturer launch products
> that will require later download software update and/or firmware upgrade.
>
> If you were a PC Tech, this wouldn't be a WTF :-) it happens all the
> time. Well at least has an easy and fast solution which is what it
> counts to be a practical product.
Interesting. I was under the impression that it's illegal to claim a
product can do X when in fact it can't. Apparently not...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 schrieb:
> Interesting. I was under the impression that it's illegal to claim a
> product can do X when in fact it can't. Apparently not...
Well, as the update proves, the product /can/...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Interesting. I was under the impression that it's illegal to claim a
>> product can do X when in fact it can't. Apparently not...
>
> Well, as the update proves, the product /can/...
Sure. Assuming you can figure out how to make an MS-DOS boot disk, load
the BIOS image from somewhere (not from the HD, because there aren't any
DOS drivers for the RAID controller), and reflash the BIOS. It's not a
trivial undertaking.
I'm reminded of the synthesizer I saw reviewed. The reviewer was rather
critical of the fact that 1) it crashes a lot, and 2) in order to edit
*all* of the parameters, you need to use the Mac-based editor program,
which costs additional money...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Sure. Assuming you can figure out how to make an MS-DOS boot disk, load
> the BIOS image from somewhere (not from the HD, because there aren't any
> DOS drivers for the RAID controller), and reflash the BIOS. It's not a
> trivial undertaking.
Yes, is not trivial but once you know how to do it is easy, you can put
everything on a CD you don't need anything else:
Make a Boot-CD with a burning app., I use Nero 6.6 (yeah is old but fast
and reliable), then add a 8.3 folder and put the BIOS and the flash
utility, burn it at the slowest speed possible (I recommend 1X) always
with very on. Nero 6.6 uses DR-DOS, which has NTFS drivers, among other
drivers, in case the flash utility needs to load the BIOS with write
rights (is dumb, I know, BIOS are not written but that's the way the
flash utility works in rare occasions, if you have only RAID try a USB
Flash sitck). That's it, just skip (F8) some drivers that you don't need
(keyboard, display, NTFS, FAT32, USB, etc) in case the flash utility
gives a "Out of memory" message error.
If you still need more memory it gets a little complicated but it can
be solved if you're patience enough:
- Download a virtual floppy
(http://chitchat.at.infoseek.co.jp/vmware/vfd.html), is fairly simple,
"create a floppy" on the HDD, boot formate it with WinXP (will create a
WinME boot floppy). Here you might want to edit 'autoexec.bat' and/or
'config.sys' to save even more memory (remember to save the floppy). Go
to your burning app. and indicate it to use the created floppy on the
virtual drive, and from here is just the same as before.
Modern BIOS now are like drivers, the BIOS updater runs on the given OS
and it just need a reboot, is really easy.
Sometimes a BIOS update is necessary for the MoBo to perform at peak
speed, I have experience this first hand with a couple of Intel D865
MoBos, they increased their speed by a fair 50-80%, they're slow out of
the box, so don't be afraid to update your BIOS.
> I'm reminded of the synthesizer I saw reviewed. The reviewer was rather
> critical of the fact that 1) it crashes a lot, and 2) in order to edit
> *all* of the parameters, you need to use the Mac-based editor program,
> which costs additional money...
That would be a most troubled product, bad luck I guess.
Cheers.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|