Stefan Viljoen wrote:

> No matter what I did, FF was totally dead. No amount of clicking, typing, or 
> anything else would help.
> 
> I was just starting to panic when I realized I was clicking on the 
> SCREENSHOT I just ook, not the actual FF instance that was running... *blush 
> squared*

HAHAHAHAHA!!!

EPIC FAILURE.

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:

> I remember turning down the brilliance of someone’s oscilloscope then 
> unscrewing the “power on” bulb. Fun, fun, fun! :)

Wait - you've touched an *actual* oscilliscope?!

Post a reply to this message

Invisible wrote:
> 
> Wait - you've touched an *actual* oscilliscope?!

What's weird in that? I have one laying on my living room's table.

-Aero

Post a reply to this message

>> Wait - you've touched an *actual* oscilliscope?!
> 
> What's weird in that? I have one laying on my living room's table.

Last time I checked, such equipment costs thousands of pounds. 
(Presumably because few people need to buy them...)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> 
> Last time I checked, such equipment costs thousands of pounds.
> (Presumably because few people need to buy them...)
> 

Well yes, the high-end ones, bought as new from the store. I paid 50
euros (or to be more precise, I got 50 euros less cash whem I received
it as a part of payment of a car I sold to my friend).

-Aero

Post a reply to this message

Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Last time I checked, such equipment costs thousands of pounds. 

So does a decent computer. :-)

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Is God willing to prevent naglams, but unable?
     Then he is not omnipotent.
   Is he able, but not willing, to prevent naglams?
     Then he is malevolent.

Post a reply to this message

Invisible wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
> 
>> I remember turning down the brilliance of someone’s oscilloscope then 
>> unscrewing the “power on” bulb. Fun, fun, fun! :)
> 
> Wait - you've touched an *actual* oscilliscope?!

It was the main tool of my trade when I started working in electronics, 
all those years ago. It was also useful for keeping sausage rolls warm, 
as it was a valve job. :-)

They looked something like this
http://www.thevalvepage.com/testeq/tek/545a/545a.htm


-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> Wait - you've touched an *actual* oscilliscope?!
>>
>> What's weird in that? I have one laying on my living room's table.
> 
> Last time I checked, such equipment costs thousands of pounds.
> (Presumably because few people need to buy them...)
> 

Had an old HP oscilliscope sitting in storage, think it was about $5 USD
when I got it. Scrap sales, surplus, and so on; universities get rid of
rid of stuff at auction around here. Lots of goodies, dirt cheap. Ya
don't have to be old to use old hardware.

Who ever I was storing it with tried to power it up, and threw it out
when it didn't work. Or sold it at a profit.

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:08:27 +0000, Orchid XP v8 wrote:

>>> Wait - you've touched an *actual* oscilliscope?!
>> 
>> What's weird in that? I have one laying on my living room's table.
> 
> Last time I checked, such equipment costs thousands of pounds.
> (Presumably because few people need to buy them...)

2 minutes on Google found this:

http://www.allspectrum.com/store/product_info.php?products_id=28

So much for "thousands of pounds", HPS10 portable handheld oscilloscope, 
on sale for $119,99.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

>> Last time I checked, such equipment costs thousands of pounds. 
> 
> So does a decent computer. :-)

You must have a radically different idea of what a "decent" computer is 
than I do. ;-) My PC was white hot when I made it, and that only cost me 
£500. (Obviously it's nearly obsolete *now*... but back when it was new, 
it was pretty hyped.)

Post a reply to this message