 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
SharkD wrote:
> On 10/27/2009 12:17 PM, John Guthkelch wrote:
>> For no reason that I can discover, Thunderbird decided to erase all my
>> p.o-t cache. It's not the first time that it's behaved in a random
>> fashion so I'm now using Pan.
>> Still getting my head round the differences and retraining my fingers but
>> I'm beginning to like it.
>> Secondly, re: a comment about showing email addresses some time back, how
>> about doing what I've done here?
>>
>> John
>
> I'm fairly satisfied with Thunderbird. The few issues I can think of
> are, 1) the advanced thread commands such as Kill and Watch do not
> appear in menus AFAIK,
At the bottom of the message menu. It's not in the roght-click menu.
> and 2) you can't configure the display of watched
> and unread threads separately.
I'm not sure what that means, but you can sort by either column.
My primary regrets are that it doesn't seem to let me kill a sub-tree of a
thread, and it doesn't show the subject-list properly, as in it does not
always default to scrolling to the header of the post you're reading when
you change posts, nor does it consistently highlight the subject line of the
post you're reading.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:41:06 -0500, Shay wrote:
>
> One problem with Pan is that you can't cancel that post. Pan sucks.
>
> -Shay
There is a cancel option under Post, but I couldn't be bothered to use it
since I'm not overly worried about my name appearing a few times. My
phone numbers and my address are different matters.
John
--
wbu### [at] tznvy pbz (rotted)
GPG Key Fingerprint: 0D9BCF4CF1B71CA2F5F7
BFBBCBC34EDEAEFCE453
Cogito sum, ergo sum, cogito.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/27/2009 2:01 PM, Darren New wrote:
> SharkD wrote:
>> I'm fairly satisfied with Thunderbird. The few issues I can think of
>> are, 1) the advanced thread commands such as Kill and Watch do not
>> appear in menus AFAIK,
>
> At the bottom of the message menu. It's not in the roght-click menu.
Still don't see it. I'm using version 3.0b4.
>> and 2) you can't configure the display of watched and unread threads
>> separately.
>
> I'm not sure what that means, but you can sort by either column.
Go to the menu View > Threads. There are some options allowing you to
select which threads to display by whether they are watched or unread.
However, you cannot say select ALL watched threads AND ALL unread threads.
Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:41:06 -0500, Shay wrote:
> One problem with Pan is that you can't cancel that post.
Sure you can, I use pan to cancel posts all the time.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:41:06 -0500, Shay wrote:
>
>> One problem with Pan is that you can't cancel that post.
>
> Sure you can, I use pan to cancel posts all the time.
>
> Jim
Looks like I missed it or was using an older version.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
SharkD wrote:
> Still don't see it. I'm using version 3.0b4.
It's in 2.0.
> Go to the menu View > Threads. There are some options allowing you to
> select which threads to display by whether they are watched or unread.
> However, you cannot say select ALL watched threads AND ALL unread threads.
I see.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:43:48 -0500, Shay wrote:
> Looks like I missed it or was using an older version.
You must've missed it, I used to use 0.14.x and it was in there as well
as in the 0.13x series that's current.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/27/09 13:22, SharkD wrote:
> Still don't see it. I'm using version 3.0b4.
Showing up fine on 3.0b2. Same place Darren described it.
--
Every little BYTE helps.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/27/09 13:01, Darren New wrote:
> My primary regrets are that it doesn't seem to let me kill a sub-tree of
> a thread,
If you're feeling adventurous, switch to the 3.0 Beta. It's in 3.0b2
(and probably beyond).
I've been using it on these newsgroups since June, and so far have no
complaints.
--
Every little BYTE helps.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Neeum Zawan wrote:
> If you're feeling adventurous, switch to the 3.0 Beta. It's in 3.0b2
> (and probably beyond).
That probably would have been a good reason to switch back when newsgroups
were still around and usable. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
