 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> But did you find SNAKES ON A PLANE?!?!!
What?! you have? if so, man I hope you weren't on the air. 0_0
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> Oh boy. I wonder why they put wings on these in the first place...
They wouldn't fly graciously if they didn't I think.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> http://www.josleys.com/show_image.php?galid=318&imageid=9309
84% crazy.
> http://nylander.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/double-spiral/ (check for 'and
> here is some POV-Ray code:')
2% crazy.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Saul Luizaga schrieb:
>> Oh boy. I wonder why they put wings on these in the first place...
>
> They wouldn't fly graciously if they didn't I think.
They're flying by sheer brute force anyway...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Saul Luizaga escreveu:
> Invisible wrote:
>> But did you find SNAKES ON A PLANE?!?!!
>
> What?! you have? if so, man I hope you weren't on the air. 0_0
That was a truly lame movie...
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> They're flying by sheer brute force anyway...
I don't know much about aerodynamics, but I think the wings have 0
sustainability by its shape, but its presence offer some by cutting
through air, gives it direction and makes possible the curves it does,
brute force mostly not sheerly I presume.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>> http://www.josleys.com/show_image.php?galid=318&imageid=9309
>
> 84% crazy.
>
>> http://nylander.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/double-spiral/ (check for
>> 'and here is some POV-Ray code:')
>
> 2% crazy.
For me all of it is fascinating and beautiful. I save them and I'm using
one as a wallpaper :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] netscape net> wrote:
> clipka wrote:
> > They're flying by sheer brute force anyway...
>
> I don't know much about aerodynamics, but I think the wings have 0
> sustainability by its shape, but its presence offer some by cutting
> through air, gives it direction and makes possible the curves it does,
> brute force mostly not sheerly I presume.
Yes, they tend to have a very steep glide path due to the flat/no airfoil.
They're really meant for flying by the prop and control surfaces rather than the
wing. Foamies sure are fun to fly though. The huge control surfaces mean
they're practically swimming if they aren't too heavy. Seeing those VPP foamies
is making me want one now!
Charles
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> That was a truly lame movie...
...and nobody saw this coming?
It's called "snakes on a plane"! That kinda tells you everything you
need to know...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> nemesis wrote:
>
>> That was a truly lame movie...
>
> ....and nobody saw this coming?
>
> It's called "snakes on a plane"! That kinda tells you everything you
> need to know...
:-D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
