 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Chambers schrieb:
>
> Not exactly. A roommate is hardup for cash, so he had a yard sale.
> Before the sale, he mentioned that he was selling one of his guitars as
> well (he still has two others). I've always wanted to play, but never
> gotten around to it, so I grabbed the chance :)
Sounds good. If he does have two more, chances are he knows a bit about
guitars and would refuse to ever owns trashy ones ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Stephen wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:08:09 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <ski### [at] vt edu> wrote:
>
>> clipka wrote:
>>> Chambers schrieb:
>>>> Now, I just have to learn to play...
>>> Always heed rule #1: Let it be fun! (But do allow your fingers to hurt :-P)
>> Never play till your fingers bleed, even if you are reminiscing about a
>> summer from 40 years back.
>
> Who's giving her age away, then. :P
Not me, that song didn't hit the radios till '84.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
clipka wrote:
> Sounds good. If he does have two more, chances are he knows a bit about
> guitars and would refuse to ever owns trashy ones ;-)
I think that cuts both ways. He's only selling the crappiest one. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Darren New schrieb:
>> Sounds good. If he does have two more, chances are he knows a bit
>> about guitars and would refuse to ever owns trashy ones ;-)
>
> I think that cuts both ways. He's only selling the crappiest one. :-)
Yeah, but even that will be ok :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:49:07 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <ski### [at] vt edu> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:08:09 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <ski### [at] vt edu> wrote:
>>
>>> clipka wrote:
>>>> Chambers schrieb:
>>>>> Now, I just have to learn to play...
>>>> Always heed rule #1: Let it be fun! (But do allow your fingers to hurt :-P)
>>> Never play till your fingers bleed, even if you are reminiscing about a
>>> summer from 40 years back.
>>
>> Who's giving her age away, then. :P
>
>Not me, that song didn't hit the radios till '84.
Sorry you lost me on that one.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Darren New wrote:
> I think that cuts both ways. He's only selling the crappiest one. :-)
No, he's also looking to sell another.
Of course, that just means he's keeping the best one, leaving the
quality of the two he's selling in doubt ;)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Stephen wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:49:07 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <ski### [at] vt edu> wrote:
>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:08:09 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <ski### [at] vt edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> clipka wrote:
>>>>> Chambers schrieb:
>>>>>> Now, I just have to learn to play...
>>>>> Always heed rule #1: Let it be fun! (But do allow your fingers to hurt :-P)
>>>> Never play till your fingers bleed, even if you are reminiscing about a
>>>> summer from 40 years back.
>>> Who's giving her age away, then. :P
>> Not me, that song didn't hit the radios till '84.
>
> Sorry you lost me on that one.
Okay, I will help out on the reference. The lyrics went, as follows:
Got my first real six string, bought it at the five and dime.
Played until my fingers bled, it was the summer of 69.
On day I will figure out if I should be impressed that I appear that
age. Not anytime soon, though.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:19:19 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <ski### [at] vt edu> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> Sorry you lost me on that one.
>
>Okay, I will help out on the reference. The lyrics went, as follows:
>
>Got my first real six string, bought it at the five and dime.
>Played until my fingers bled, it was the summer of 69.
>
>
Thanks :oops:
I don't know the song but I am of that age and 1969 was a very good year.
>On day I will figure out if I should be impressed that I appear that
>age. Not anytime soon, though.
You don't look it and I was surprised that you said 40 years ago.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Stephen wrote:
> I don't know the song but I am of that age and 1969 was a very good year.
There was a concert or something, right? I either missed it or don't
remember.
>> On day I will figure out if I should be impressed that I appear that
>> age. Not anytime soon, though.
>
> You don't look it and I was surprised that you said 40 years ago.
I had forgotten that picture ended up here. I was pestering Google to
see if any of the publicity photos were floating around, and being
amused at the antics of everyone else who shares my name.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:51:19 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <ski### [at] vt edu> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> I don't know the song but I am of that age and 1969 was a very good year.
>
>There was a concert or something, right? I either missed it or don't
>remember.
>
Two far for me to travel, man. :)
>>> On day I will figure out if I should be impressed that I appear that
>>> age. Not anytime soon, though.
>>
>> You don't look it and I was surprised that you said 40 years ago.
>
>I had forgotten that picture ended up here. I was pestering Google to
>see if any of the publicity photos were floating around, and being
>amused at the antics of everyone else who shares my name.
Oops! Sorry, I just said that jokingly. I've not seen your picture and I'm not
going to bite on your enticing reply. :P
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|
 |