 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27 Aug 2009 12:17:32 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> It takes all types ;)
>
>Yes it does. :-) His brother is also in law enforcement, oddly enough.
... to make a world :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:40:11 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 27 Aug 2009 12:17:32 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>> It takes all types ;)
>>
>>Yes it does. :-) His brother is also in law enforcement, oddly enough.
>
> ... to make a world :)
Of course, some people take the approach "it doesn't take all types, we
just happen to have all types". ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On 26 Aug 2009 18:39:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:01:59 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> I don't mean to contradict but I will :P
>>>>
>>>>So in other words, you do mean to contradict me. ;-)
>>>>
>>> No because you said "I think" ;)
>>
>>But you said "I will". ;-)
>>
> Does your wife ever say that you would start an argument in an empty room?
>
> Mine does :-)
What do you mean "yours does"? Your wife says *you* would start an argument
in an empty room, or she says *Stephen* would? :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28 Aug 2009 12:11:06 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:40:11 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 27 Aug 2009 12:17:32 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>>> It takes all types ;)
>>>
>>>Yes it does. :-) His brother is also in law enforcement, oddly enough.
>>
>> ... to make a world :)
>
>Of course, some people take the approach "it doesn't take all types, we
>just happen to have all types". ;)
>
>
I supose that some people would.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:48:45 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom>
wrote:
>
>What do you mean "yours does"? Your wife says *you* would start an argument
>in an empty room, or she says *Stephen* would? :)
I meant that my wife (I'm Stephen) says that I can start an argument in an empty
room. By that she means that I'm argumentative. Whereas think that she jut
doesn't like being wrong :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:24:12 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>Of course, some people take the approach "it doesn't take all types, we
>>just happen to have all types". ;)
>>
> I supose that some people would.
It seems somewhat anthropic to me - either that or it's a variation on
Popeye's "I am what I am". :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> I meant that my wife (I'm Stephen)
Heh, I mixed who wrote what in the thread...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:04:41 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom>
wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> I meant that my wife (I'm Stephen)
>
>Heh, I mixed who wrote what in the thread...
I thought that you might have ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28 Aug 2009 18:37:55 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:24:12 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>Of course, some people take the approach "it doesn't take all types, we
>>>just happen to have all types". ;)
>>>
>> I supose that some people would.
>
>It seems somewhat anthropic to me - either that or it's a variation on
>Popeye's "I am what I am". :)
>
It is :) The one that I like is, I think from your Mr Abe Lincoln. "People who
like this sort of thing will find this the sort of thing they like."
I suppose I should have written "I suppose that *some* people would." :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:23:28 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 28 Aug 2009 18:37:55 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:24:12 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>Of course, some people take the approach "it doesn't take all types,
>>>>we just happen to have all types". ;)
>>>>
>>> I supose that some people would.
>>
>>It seems somewhat anthropic to me - either that or it's a variation on
>>Popeye's "I am what I am". :)
>>
>>
> It is :) The one that I like is, I think from your Mr Abe Lincoln.
> "People who like this sort of thing will find this the sort of thing
> they like."
>
> I suppose I should have written "I suppose that *some* people would." :)
:-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
