 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:49:55 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>> No because you said "I think" ;)
>>
>>But you said "I will". ;-)
>>
> Does your wife ever say that you would start an argument in an empty
> room?
>
> Mine does :-)
Mine doesn't, oddly enough. :-)
>>> An assumption on your part. Just because my name is "Stephen" that
>>> does not mean that I am a man or good or even human, or sane.
>>
>>Oh, no, no assumption on my part - just a commentary on the lack of
>>admission. :-)
>
> My brother-in-law is a lawyer {God rot his soul (if he has one)} :-)
LOL! I'm named for a lawyer, former JAG of the US Navy. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26 Aug 2009 18:59:49 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:49:55 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> Does your wife ever say that you would start an argument in an empty
>> room?
>>
>> Mine does :-)
>
>Mine doesn't, oddly enough. :-)
>
It must be me, then.
>> My brother-in-law is a lawyer {God rot his soul (if he has one)} :-)
>
>LOL! I'm named for a lawyer, former JAG of the US Navy. :-)
>
It takes all types ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:14:12 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>Mine doesn't, oddly enough. :-)
>>
> It must be me, then.
LOL
>>> My brother-in-law is a lawyer {God rot his soul (if he has one)} :-)
>>
>>LOL! I'm named for a lawyer, former JAG of the US Navy. :-)
>>
>>
> It takes all types ;)
Yes it does. :-) His brother is also in law enforcement, oddly enough.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27 Aug 2009 12:17:32 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> It takes all types ;)
>
>Yes it does. :-) His brother is also in law enforcement, oddly enough.
... to make a world :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:40:11 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 27 Aug 2009 12:17:32 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>> It takes all types ;)
>>
>>Yes it does. :-) His brother is also in law enforcement, oddly enough.
>
> ... to make a world :)
Of course, some people take the approach "it doesn't take all types, we
just happen to have all types". ;)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On 26 Aug 2009 18:39:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:01:59 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> I don't mean to contradict but I will :P
>>>>
>>>>So in other words, you do mean to contradict me. ;-)
>>>>
>>> No because you said "I think" ;)
>>
>>But you said "I will". ;-)
>>
> Does your wife ever say that you would start an argument in an empty room?
>
> Mine does :-)
What do you mean "yours does"? Your wife says *you* would start an argument
in an empty room, or she says *Stephen* would? :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28 Aug 2009 12:11:06 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:40:11 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 27 Aug 2009 12:17:32 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>>> It takes all types ;)
>>>
>>>Yes it does. :-) His brother is also in law enforcement, oddly enough.
>>
>> ... to make a world :)
>
>Of course, some people take the approach "it doesn't take all types, we
>just happen to have all types". ;)
>
>
I supose that some people would.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:48:45 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom>
wrote:
>
>What do you mean "yours does"? Your wife says *you* would start an argument
>in an empty room, or she says *Stephen* would? :)
I meant that my wife (I'm Stephen) says that I can start an argument in an empty
room. By that she means that I'm argumentative. Whereas think that she jut
doesn't like being wrong :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:24:12 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>Of course, some people take the approach "it doesn't take all types, we
>>just happen to have all types". ;)
>>
> I supose that some people would.
It seems somewhat anthropic to me - either that or it's a variation on
Popeye's "I am what I am". :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> I meant that my wife (I'm Stephen)
Heh, I mixed who wrote what in the thread...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
