On 26 Aug 2009 11:44:46 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>Yeah, I think that's the one from April....

I don't mean to contradict but I will :P
I'm sure there was one from years ago. It might have been before Darren started
posting regularly. 
I may be wrong but I won't admit it ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 26 Aug 2009 11:43:55 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> That's an old Goons joke. :)
>
>And you said you didn't listen to The Goons. ;-)

No I said that I wasn't a fan. My father was.

[sings] Across the Irish sea. :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:27:21 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 26 Aug 2009 11:43:55 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> That's an old Goons joke. :)
>>
>>And you said you didn't listen to The Goons. ;-)
> 
> No I said that I wasn't a fan. My father was.
> 
> [sings] Across the Irish sea. :)

LOL

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:25:30 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 26 Aug 2009 11:44:46 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Yeah, I think that's the one from April....
> 
> I don't mean to contradict but I will :P 

So in other words, you do mean to contradict me. ;-)

> I'm sure there was one from
> years ago. It might have been before Darren started posting regularly.
> I may be wrong but I won't admit it ;)

Good man. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 26 Aug 2009 17:21:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:25:30 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 26 Aug 2009 11:44:46 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Yeah, I think that's the one from April....
>> 
>> I don't mean to contradict but I will :P 
>
>So in other words, you do mean to contradict me. ;-)
>

No because you said "I think" ;)

>> I'm sure there was one from
>> years ago. It might have been before Darren started posting regularly.
>> I may be wrong but I won't admit it ;)
>
>Good man. ;-)
>
An assumption on your part. Just because my name is "Stephen" that does not mean
that I am a man or good or even human, or sane.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:01:59 +0100, Stephen wrote:

>>> I don't mean to contradict but I will :P
>>
>>So in other words, you do mean to contradict me. ;-)
>>
> No because you said "I think" ;)

But you said "I will". ;-)

>>> I'm sure there was one from
>>> years ago. It might have been before Darren started posting regularly.
>>> I may be wrong but I won't admit it ;)
>>
>>Good man. ;-)
>>
> An assumption on your part. Just because my name is "Stephen" that does
> not mean that I am a man or good or even human, or sane.

Oh, no, no assumption on my part - just a commentary on the lack of 
admission. :-)

Post a reply to this message

On 26 Aug 2009 18:39:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:01:59 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> I don't mean to contradict but I will :P
>>>
>>>So in other words, you do mean to contradict me. ;-)
>>>
>> No because you said "I think" ;)
>
>But you said "I will". ;-)
>
Does your wife ever say that you would start an argument in an empty room? 

Mine does :-)

>>>> I'm sure there was one from
>>>> years ago. It might have been before Darren started posting regularly.
>>>> I may be wrong but I won't admit it ;)
>>>
>>>Good man. ;-)
>>>
>> An assumption on your part. Just because my name is "Stephen" that does
>> not mean that I am a man or good or even human, or sane.
>
>Oh, no, no assumption on my part - just a commentary on the lack of 
>admission. :-)

My brother-in-law is a lawyer {God rot his soul (if he has one)} :-)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:49:55 +0100, Stephen wrote:

>>> No because you said "I think" ;)
>>
>>But you said "I will". ;-)
>>
> Does your wife ever say that you would start an argument in an empty
> room?
> 
> Mine does :-)

Mine doesn't, oddly enough. :-)

>>> An assumption on your part. Just because my name is "Stephen" that
>>> does not mean that I am a man or good or even human, or sane.
>>
>>Oh, no, no assumption on my part - just a commentary on the lack of
>>admission. :-)
> 
> My brother-in-law is a lawyer {God rot his soul (if he has one)} :-)

LOL!  I'm named for a lawyer, former JAG of the US Navy. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 26 Aug 2009 18:59:49 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:49:55 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>

>> Does your wife ever say that you would start an argument in an empty
>> room?
>> 
>> Mine does :-)
>
>Mine doesn't, oddly enough. :-)
>

It must be me, then. 

>> My brother-in-law is a lawyer {God rot his soul (if he has one)} :-)
>
>LOL!  I'm named for a lawyer, former JAG of the US Navy. :-)
>

It takes all types ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:14:12 +0100, Stephen wrote:

>>Mine doesn't, oddly enough. :-)
>>
> It must be me, then.

LOL

>>> My brother-in-law is a lawyer {God rot his soul (if he has one)} :-)
>>
>>LOL!  I'm named for a lawyer, former JAG of the US Navy. :-)
>>
>>
> It takes all types ;)

Yes it does.  :-)  His brother is also in law enforcement, oddly enough.

Jim

Post a reply to this message