 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:14:23 +0200, "Fredrik Eriksson"
<fe79}--at--{yahoo}--dot--{com> wrote:
>This is the one I was talking about:
>http://news.povray.org/povray.off-topic/thread/%3C49ec8b09%241%40news.povray.org%3E/
>
>There was also some peripheral discussion here:
>http://news.povray.org/povray.off-topic/thread/%3C49f68344%40news.povray.org%3E/
>
Thanks, I found both of those Fredrik. I would need to resurrect an old laptop
to find the thread, I think.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:06:44 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:30:22 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>
>>Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> And Pearl's mother says her tea is ready :)
>>
>>Oh... You must be /Mother of Pearl/. :-D
>
> That's an old Goons joke. :)
And you said you didn't listen to The Goons. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:52:22 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:00:18 +0200, "Fredrik Eriksson"
> <fe79}--at--{yahoo}--dot--{com> wrote:
>
>
>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>
>>> Well I searched OT back to 2007 and could not find the thread.
>>
>>There was a discussion about the meaning of infinity in April this year.
>>Monkeys were mentioned.
>
> Yes, but the one I remember was quite long and it went into the
> "infinite number of monkeys on an infinite number of typewriters hitting
> the keys for an infinite time" hypothesis, in depth.
Yeah, I think that's the one from April....
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 26 Aug 2009 11:44:46 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>Yeah, I think that's the one from April....
I don't mean to contradict but I will :P
I'm sure there was one from years ago. It might have been before Darren started
posting regularly.
I may be wrong but I won't admit it ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 26 Aug 2009 11:43:55 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> That's an old Goons joke. :)
>
>And you said you didn't listen to The Goons. ;-)
No I said that I wasn't a fan. My father was.
[sings] Across the Irish sea. :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:27:21 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 26 Aug 2009 11:43:55 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>> That's an old Goons joke. :)
>>
>>And you said you didn't listen to The Goons. ;-)
>
> No I said that I wasn't a fan. My father was.
>
> [sings] Across the Irish sea. :)
LOL
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:25:30 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 26 Aug 2009 11:44:46 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>
>>Yeah, I think that's the one from April....
>
> I don't mean to contradict but I will :P
So in other words, you do mean to contradict me. ;-)
> I'm sure there was one from
> years ago. It might have been before Darren started posting regularly.
> I may be wrong but I won't admit it ;)
Good man. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 26 Aug 2009 17:21:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:25:30 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 26 Aug 2009 11:44:46 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Yeah, I think that's the one from April....
>>
>> I don't mean to contradict but I will :P
>
>So in other words, you do mean to contradict me. ;-)
>
No because you said "I think" ;)
>> I'm sure there was one from
>> years ago. It might have been before Darren started posting regularly.
>> I may be wrong but I won't admit it ;)
>
>Good man. ;-)
>
An assumption on your part. Just because my name is "Stephen" that does not mean
that I am a man or good or even human, or sane.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:01:59 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>> I don't mean to contradict but I will :P
>>
>>So in other words, you do mean to contradict me. ;-)
>>
> No because you said "I think" ;)
But you said "I will". ;-)
>>> I'm sure there was one from
>>> years ago. It might have been before Darren started posting regularly.
>>> I may be wrong but I won't admit it ;)
>>
>>Good man. ;-)
>>
> An assumption on your part. Just because my name is "Stephen" that does
> not mean that I am a man or good or even human, or sane.
Oh, no, no assumption on my part - just a commentary on the lack of
admission. :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 26 Aug 2009 18:39:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:01:59 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> I don't mean to contradict but I will :P
>>>
>>>So in other words, you do mean to contradict me. ;-)
>>>
>> No because you said "I think" ;)
>
>But you said "I will". ;-)
>
Does your wife ever say that you would start an argument in an empty room?
Mine does :-)
>>>> I'm sure there was one from
>>>> years ago. It might have been before Darren started posting regularly.
>>>> I may be wrong but I won't admit it ;)
>>>
>>>Good man. ;-)
>>>
>> An assumption on your part. Just because my name is "Stephen" that does
>> not mean that I am a man or good or even human, or sane.
>
>Oh, no, no assumption on my part - just a commentary on the lack of
>admission. :-)
My brother-in-law is a lawyer {God rot his soul (if he has one)} :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |