 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Invisible
Subject: Re: F'ing Awsome way to lose your girlfriend
Date: 18 Aug 2009 05:49:24
Message: <4a8a7924@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Yeah, but, you would have thought if you *told* this person you would
>> be gone for 2 weeks, they wouldn't go insane at you when you're away
>> for two weeks...
>
> It's obvious from her emails she had no clue where he was
Agreed.
> wouldn't you
> have talked about your trip with your girlfriend all the time before you
> left?
Yes.
I would have thought I'd have mentioned it quite a lot. And the video
suggests that this guy did. ("I even phoned her the night before to say
goodbye.") It seems she simply didn't take notice...
> Something doesn't make sense.
Either there's something we're not hearing, or she really is *that* dense...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> His worst decision is to turn it into a 10-minute multi-megabyte video
> of text with annoying (and probably stolen) background music, rather
> than a 1K text file you could read in under a minute. </rant>
...there's music?
Ouch.
But yeah, does seem slightly unecessary. Should have made a PowerPoint
presentation. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Yeah, but, you would have thought if you *told* this person you would be
> gone for 2 weeks, they wouldn't go insane at you when you're away for
> two weeks...
Never assume women will be intelligent or logical...
<ducks>
;)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Invisible
Subject: Re: F'ing Awsome way to lose your girlfriend
Date: 18 Aug 2009 09:58:57
Message: <4a8ab3a1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> Never assume women will be intelligent or logical...
>
> ;)
...which is puzzling, given that it is scientifically proven that women
are more intelligent than men.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Either there's something we're not hearing, or she really is *that*
> dense...
From the tone of the emails, I wouldn't say she's dense; just
self-absorbed. Unfortunately, I've known girls like this (never had the
misfortune of dating one, though).
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> From the tone of the emails, I wouldn't say she's dense; just
> self-absorbed. Unfortunately, I've known girls like this (never had the
> misfortune of dating one, though).
The /unfortunate/ thing is that when I look over the message exchanges
between me and the first girl I ever kissed, it reads like "OMG, it's
been an entire hour since the last time I heard from you! Why are you
ignoring me?!"
No wonder she didn't like me. :-(
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Chambers wrote:
>
>> Never assume women will be intelligent or logical...
>>
>> ;)
>
> ...which is puzzling, given that it is scientifically proven that women
> are more intelligent than men.
Hence the lack of logic.
What? You were all thinking the same thing!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:29:36 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <ski### [at] vt edu> wrote:
>Invisible wrote:
>> Chambers wrote:
>>
>>> Never assume women will be intelligent or logical...
>>>
>>> ;)
>>
>> ...which is puzzling, given that it is scientifically proven that women
>> are more intelligent than men.
>
>Hence the lack of logic.
>
Just a different logic, more multi-threaded. (So that you can sew better :P)
>What? You were all thinking the same thing!
Obviously not what you were thinking. Duh!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Invisible
Subject: Re: F'ing Awsome way to lose your girlfriend
Date: 18 Aug 2009 10:41:30
Message: <4a8abd9a@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> Never assume women will be intelligent or logical...
>>>
>>> ;)
>> ...which is puzzling, given that it is scientifically proven that women
>> are more intelligent than men.
>
> Hence the lack of logic.
>
> What? You were all thinking the same thing!
Um... no, not really.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Did anyone else reach the conclusion that maybe he's much better this way?
DING!
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
