|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey all,
I have an old CD with pictures on it that was written under and earlier
version of Windows
when it was easy to add data to a CD and, if you weren't careful, make
everything already on
the CD unreadable. Presumable the data is still there. The data was
readable until quite recently
added another picture. Now it is the only file readable. Disk properties
shows the disk to be about
half full.Does anybody know of any easily available software that could
recover it?
Thanks,
David
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 14/08/2009 17:29, David H. Burns nous fit lire :
> Hey all,
>
> I have an old CD with pictures on it that was written under and earlier
> version of Windows
> when it was easy to add data to a CD and, if you weren't careful, make
> everything already on
> the CD unreadable. Presumable the data is still there. The data was
> readable until quite recently
> added another picture. Now it is the only file readable. Disk properties
> shows the disk to be about
> half full.Does anybody know of any easily available software that could
> recover it?
you need a software able to select & read the previous sessions of the CD.
IsoBuster might be what you want on windows.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 14/08/2009 17:29, David H. Burns nous fit lire :
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have an old CD with pictures on it that was written under and earlier
>> version of Windows
>> when it was easy to add data to a CD and, if you weren't careful, make
>> everything already on
>> the CD unreadable. Presumable the data is still there. The data was
>> readable until quite recently
>> added another picture. Now it is the only file readable. Disk properties
>> shows the disk to be about
>> half full.Does anybody know of any easily available software that could
>> recover it?
>
> you need a software able to select & read the previous sessions of the CD.
> IsoBuster might be what you want on windows.
>
Thanks I'll look it up.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I had a similar problem recently when I added a new file (and thus a new
session) to a regular CDR. Only the new files were readable. I think it
is because you can't add new sessions to CDRs. You can only add them to
CDRWs (rewritable CDRs). Not 100% sure though.
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:10:47 -0400, SharkD wrote:
> I had a similar problem recently when I added a new file (and thus a new
> session) to a regular CDR. Only the new files were readable. I think it
> is because you can't add new sessions to CDRs. You can only add them to
> CDRWs (rewritable CDRs). Not 100% sure though.
I'm pretty sure you can add new sessions to CDRs, but the common practice
is to import the previous session first (thus preserving the access
information in the TOC on the disc). If one doesn't do that, then it can
appear that data's been lost.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You can add new sessions to a CD provided
- you created the cd in "multisession mode"
- you did not have your cd-burner "finalize" the cd which prevents ordinary
programs from adding additional sessions.
If you used a CD-R (not a CD-RW) the data IS still on the disk. On a CD-R
data cannot be overwritten, it is always appended. That's the point of
having a CD-R, the data written to it can not be deleted.
BTW: in our country it is cheaper to back up data on an external HDD than on
CD. A 1400 GB external HDD costs about 89 EUR without VAT. You would have to
buy 2200 CD's to store the same amount of data ;-), so HDD is cheaper,
of storage space... the same as 570 bottles of wine.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I had a similar problem recently when I added a new file (and thus a new
>> session) to a regular CDR. Only the new files were readable. I think it
>> is because you can't add new sessions to CDRs. You can only add them to
>> CDRWs (rewritable CDRs). Not 100% sure though.
>
> I'm pretty sure you can add new sessions to CDRs, but the common practice
> is to import the previous session first (thus preserving the access
> information in the TOC on the disc). If one doesn't do that, then it can
> appear that data's been lost.
It is, indeed, possible to have multiple sessions on a CD-R. I've done it.
It is also usual to import the previous session. If you don't, Windows
appears not to be able to "see" the previous data. Note, however, that
AmigaOS *can*.
I've done this personally. Burn several sessions to a CD, and when you
insert it, AmigaOS prompts you for which session you want to access.
(Recall that AmigaOS tracks all disk insert/eject events.) You then see
the data in the selected session only (and any data it imports).
My Amiga was using a plain ordinary IDE CD-RW drive, so it seems to me
that a PC should be able to do the same trick, given the correct
software. It wouldn't surprise me if something like cdparanoia can grab
an arbitrary session, dump it into an ISO file, and then let you
loop-mount that to read it...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TC wrote:
> You can add new sessions to a CD provided
>
> - you created the cd in "multisession mode"
> - you did not have your cd-burner "finalize" the cd which prevents ordinary
> programs from adding additional sessions.
>
> If you used a CD-R (not a CD-RW) the data IS still on the disk. On a CD-R
> data cannot be overwritten, it is always appended. That's the point of
> having a CD-R, the data written to it can not be deleted.
>
> BTW: in our country it is cheaper to back up data on an external HDD than on
> CD. A 1400 GB external HDD costs about 89 EUR without VAT. You would have to
> buy 2200 CD's to store the same amount of data ;-), so HDD is cheaper,
> faster and much more versatile. Besides, storing 2200 CD would use up 0.4 m�
> of storage space... the same as 570 bottles of wine.
Of course, you could back up to DVD or Blu-Ray, but those cost more too...
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |