|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://www.sdtimes.com/blog/post/2009/07/27/Everyonee28099s-talking-about-Haskell.aspx
"Despite its distance from traditional programming, and its relative
lack of common use, Haskell has become one of the most talked-about
languages on the Internet."
Um, WTF? No it hasn't!
If it weren't for the fact that I happen to use Haskell, I would never
have heard of it. And if that sounds like a tautology, I've never used
Python, don't know what Python code even looks like. But I've heard of
it. Ditto for PHP, Ruby, ASP, C# and so on. Never seen any code, never
used them, but I've certainly heard of them. Who the hell has heard of
Haskell?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:4a801e78$1@news.povray.org...
> Who the hell has heard of Haskell?
Everyone? Eddie Haskell was a character on Leave it to Beaver. Doh!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible schrieb:
> "Despite its distance from traditional programming, and its relative
> lack of common use, Haskell has become one of the most talked-about
> languages on the Internet."
>
> Um, WTF? No it hasn't!
Well, according to the statistics on www.langpop.org it has. More
talked-about than even C# or Ruby. And you can't argue about statistics,
can you? :P
> If it weren't for the fact that I happen to use Haskell, I would never
> have heard of it. And if that sounds like a tautology, I've never used
> Python, don't know what Python code even looks like. But I've heard of
> it. Ditto for PHP, Ruby, ASP, C# and so on. Never seen any code, never
> used them, but I've certainly heard of them. Who the hell has heard of
> Haskell?
Probably everyone who has ever visited povray.off-topic :P
Actually it seems to me that there's more discussion about Haskell here
than, for instance, PHP, Ruby, Python, Perl, Java, and possibly even C#.
Though I guess the discussions we've seen here only serve the point that
whether a language is *talked* about is quite orthogonal to whether
people consider it any *relevant* :-P
So the statistics can also be interpreted that Haskell is a much more
polarizing topic than other languages of similar relevance - or that it
just happens to be the current favorite subject for programmers' idle
smalltalk (no pun intended) ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> "Despite its distance from traditional programming, and its relative
>> lack of common use, Haskell has become one of the most talked-about
>> languages on the Internet."
>>
>> Um, WTF? No it hasn't!
>
> Well, according to the statistics on www.langpop.org it has. More
> talked-about than even C# or Ruby. And you can't argue about statistics,
> can you? :P
Heh. Depends on how those statistics are collected. ;-)
From what I've seen, Lisp, Earlang and Clean get *way* more publicity
than little old Haskell. Even ML is more widely known.
(E.g., XKCD makes several references to Lisp and Python, but never once
mentions Haskell.)
>> Who the hell has heard of Haskell?
>
> Probably everyone who has ever visited povray.off-topic :P
Only after I heard about it. :-P
> Actually it seems to me that there's more discussion about Haskell here
> than, for instance, PHP, Ruby, Python, Perl, Java, and possibly even C#.
Depends on whether you mean "discussion" and in people arguing about the
merits of a given language, or "mention" as in people using its name.
I'd say there is *a lot* more material written about C, C++, C#, Java,
etc. than there is about Haskell. Whether they are "discussed" more is
harder to quantify. Certainly Haskell's name is less widely heard.
> Though I guess the discussions we've seen here only serve the point that
> whether a language is *talked* about is quite orthogonal to whether
> people consider it any *relevant* :-P
And, indeed, being talked about is quite orthogonal to being *used*,
much less being *useful*.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-8-2009 15:19, Invisible wrote:
>
http://www.sdtimes.com/blog/post/2009/07/27/Everyonee28099s-talking-about-Haskell.aspx
>
>
> "Despite its distance from traditional programming, and its relative
> lack of common use, Haskell has become one of the most talked-about
> languages on the Internet."
>
> Um, WTF? No it hasn't!
It is in this newsgroup. We even have two whole subnewsgroups devoted to
it even though this is a server about a totally different language.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:53:21 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> (E.g., XKCD makes several references to Lisp and Python, but never once
> mentions Haskell.)
But it gets talked about in xkcd's forum.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08/10/09 10:53, Invisible wrote:
> From what I've seen, Lisp, Earlang and Clean get *way* more publicity
> than little old Haskell. Even ML is more widely known.
Hadn't heard of Clean till today.
Lisp used to be the king, but I'm sure if you look at the rate over the
last 2 years, Haskell exceeds it.
--
"I've dropped my toothpaste," said Tom, crestfallen.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:4a801e78$1@news.povray.org...
>
http://www.sdtimes.com/blog/post/2009/07/27/Everyonee28099s-talking-about-Haskell.aspx
>
> "Despite its distance from traditional programming, and its relative
> lack of common use, Haskell has become one of the most talked-about
> languages on the Internet."
>
> Um, WTF? No it hasn't!
The author is obviously generalizing from p.o-t.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> From what I've seen, Lisp, Earlang and Clean get *way* more publicity
>> than little old Haskell. Even ML is more widely known.
>
> Hadn't heard of Clean till today.
Yeah, Erlang is more widely known.
Clean is sort-of like Haskell, but much more messy. (Which makes the
name kind of interesting...) It's more low-level, reputedly giving you
better performance.
> Lisp used to be the king, but I'm sure if you look at the rate over
> the last 2 years, Haskell exceeds it.
I don't know about that - ever heard of Emacs?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> (E.g., XKCD makes several references to Lisp and Python, but never once
>> mentions Haskell.)
>
> But it gets talked about in xkcd's forum.
The Bellman-Ford algorithm gets talked about in that forum. Ever heard
of it? I haven't.
Oh, and something called "Firefly"...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|