 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 10-8-2009 15:19, Invisible wrote:
>
http://www.sdtimes.com/blog/post/2009/07/27/Everyonee28099s-talking-about-Haskell.aspx
>
>
> "Despite its distance from traditional programming, and its relative
> lack of common use, Haskell has become one of the most talked-about
> languages on the Internet."
>
> Um, WTF? No it hasn't!
It is in this newsgroup. We even have two whole subnewsgroups devoted to
it even though this is a server about a totally different language.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:53:21 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> (E.g., XKCD makes several references to Lisp and Python, but never once
> mentions Haskell.)
But it gets talked about in xkcd's forum.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 08/10/09 10:53, Invisible wrote:
> From what I've seen, Lisp, Earlang and Clean get *way* more publicity
> than little old Haskell. Even ML is more widely known.
Hadn't heard of Clean till today.
Lisp used to be the king, but I'm sure if you look at the rate over the
last 2 years, Haskell exceeds it.
--
"I've dropped my toothpaste," said Tom, crestfallen.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Invisible" <voi### [at] dev null> wrote in message
news:4a801e78$1@news.povray.org...
>
http://www.sdtimes.com/blog/post/2009/07/27/Everyonee28099s-talking-about-Haskell.aspx
>
> "Despite its distance from traditional programming, and its relative
> lack of common use, Haskell has become one of the most talked-about
> languages on the Internet."
>
> Um, WTF? No it hasn't!
The author is obviously generalizing from p.o-t.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>> From what I've seen, Lisp, Earlang and Clean get *way* more publicity
>> than little old Haskell. Even ML is more widely known.
>
> Hadn't heard of Clean till today.
Yeah, Erlang is more widely known.
Clean is sort-of like Haskell, but much more messy. (Which makes the
name kind of interesting...) It's more low-level, reputedly giving you
better performance.
> Lisp used to be the king, but I'm sure if you look at the rate over
> the last 2 years, Haskell exceeds it.
I don't know about that - ever heard of Emacs?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>> (E.g., XKCD makes several references to Lisp and Python, but never once
>> mentions Haskell.)
>
> But it gets talked about in xkcd's forum.
The Bellman-Ford algorithm gets talked about in that forum. Ever heard
of it? I haven't.
Oh, and something called "Firefly"...
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>> "Despite its distance from traditional programming, and its relative
>> lack of common use, Haskell has become one of the most talked-about
>> languages on the Internet."
>>
>> Um, WTF? No it hasn't!
>
> It is in this newsgroup. We even have two whole subnewsgroups devoted to
> it even though this is a server about a totally different language.
Heh. One person talking to himself doesn't count as "discussion",
methinks. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
In article <4a812918$1@news.povray.org>,
Invisible wrote:
>>> (E.g., XKCD makes several references to Lisp and Python, but never once
>>> mentions Haskell.)
>>
>> But it gets talked about in xkcd's forum.
>
> The Bellman-Ford algorithm gets talked about in that forum. Ever heard
> of it? I haven't.
>
> Oh, and something called "Firefly"...
And raptors! What on Earth are those creatures? They come through your
window! Scary.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>>>> (E.g., XKCD makes several references to Lisp and Python, but never once
>>>> mentions Haskell.)
>>> But it gets talked about in xkcd's forum.
>> The Bellman-Ford algorithm gets talked about in that forum. Ever heard
>> of it? I haven't.
>>
>> Oh, and something called "Firefly"...
>
> And raptors! What on Earth are those creatures? They come through your
> window! Scary.
Oh, *that* at least makes sense. Go watch Jurassic Park. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
In article <4a814f7b$1@news.povray.org>,
Invisible wrote:
>>>>> (E.g., XKCD makes several references to Lisp and Python, but never once
>>>>> mentions Haskell.)
>>>> But it gets talked about in xkcd's forum.
>>> The Bellman-Ford algorithm gets talked about in that forum. Ever heard
>>> of it? I haven't.
>>>
>>> Oh, and something called "Firefly"...
>>
>> And raptors! What on Earth are those creatures? They come through your
>> window! Scary.
>
> Oh, *that* at least makes sense. Go watch Jurassic Park. ;-)
I know. :-) (Even though I never watched it.)
I love the raptors. I might even watch this jurassic movie someday
just to see them in motion pictures. Such is the effect of word of
mouth.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |