On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:15:27 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:44:28 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> 
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> Funnily enough it is mostly those who get (or report) high scores, who are in
>>>> favour of the concept of IQ.
>>> Why is that funny?
>> 
>> Funny peculiar not funny ha ha
>
>I don't find it peculiar at all.

You must have a high IQ, then.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 08/06/09 19:51, Stephen wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:15:27 -0700, Darren New<dne### [at] sanrrcom>  wrote:
>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:44:28 -0700, Darren New<dne### [at] sanrrcom>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> Funnily enough it is mostly those who get (or report) high scores, who are in
>>>>> favour of the concept of IQ.
>>>> Why is that funny?
>>> Funny peculiar not funny ha ha
>> I don't find it peculiar at all.
>
> You must have a high IQ, then.

	Or a low IQ, depending on your perspective.

-- 
It's not hard to meet expenses, they're everywhere.

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:16:17 -0500, Neeum Zawan <m.n### [at] ieeeorg> wrote:

>On 08/06/09 19:51, Stephen wrote:
>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:15:27 -0700, Darren New<dne### [at] sanrrcom>  wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:44:28 -0700, Darren New<dne### [at] sanrrcom>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>> Funnily enough it is mostly those who get (or report) high scores, who are in
>>>>>> favour of the concept of IQ.
>>>>> Why is that funny?
>>>> Funny peculiar not funny ha ha
>>> I don't find it peculiar at all.
>>
>> You must have a high IQ, then.
>
>	Or a low IQ, depending on your perspective.

I wouldn't say that.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message