 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm
The moon does not really exist. It's all a conspiracy.
Actually, the bit about Jack and Jill was quite interesting for one who
never knew what that poem was about.
http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/Feedback4.htm
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
back to version 1.0."
"We've done that already. We call it 2.0."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:39:56 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote:
>http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm
>
>The moon does not really exist. It's all a conspiracy.
>
Wasre of time, wanker
>Actually, the bit about Jack and Jill was quite interesting for one who
>never knew what that poem was about.
>http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/Feedback4.htm
Try http://www.rhymes.org.uk/jack_and_jill.htm
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Try http://www.rhymes.org.uk/jack_and_jill.htm
Very cool. Seems lots of nursery rhymes come from that time frame too.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
back to version 1.0."
"We've done that already. We call it 2.0."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm
>
> The moon does not really exist. It's all a conspiracy.
>
> Actually, the bit about Jack and Jill was quite interesting for one who
> never knew what that poem was about.
> http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/Feedback4.htm
>
>
No! They've got in all wrong! It's the Earth that doesn't exist!mankind
has far so
long been deluded on this matter that the goddess Selene herself cannot
rid them
of their delusion!
David
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:18:02 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> Try http://www.rhymes.org.uk/jack_and_jill.htm
>
>Very cool. Seems lots of nursery rhymes come from that time frame too.
And earlier too. Ring a ring of roses comes from the Great Plague (1665), "Hush
a-bye baby in the tree-top" may have been written by someone who travelled with
the Pilgrim Fathers. "Mary, Mary quite contrary" could have been about Mary
Tudor or possibly Mary Stewart.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:02:19 -0500, "David H. Burns" <dhb### [at] cherokeetelnet>
wrote:
>No! They've got in all wrong! It's the Earth that doesn't exist!mankind
>has far so
>long been deluded on this matter that the goddess Selene herself cannot
>rid them
>of their delusion!
I'm beginning to think that it's the part of the Earth westward of the Western
Isles that doesn't exist (in reality).
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:02:19 -0500, "David H. Burns" <dhb### [at] cherokeetelnet>
> wrote:
>
>> No! They've got in all wrong! It's the Earth that doesn't exist!mankind
>> has far so
>> long been deluded on this matter that the goddess Selene herself cannot
>> rid them
>> of their delusion!
>
> I'm beginning to think that it's the part of the Earth westward of the Western
> Isles that doesn't exist (in reality).
>
Or in sanity
David
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
> I'm beginning to think that it's the part of the Earth westward of the Western
> Isles that doesn't exist (in reality).
Well, I believe that they *do* exist. But whether their inhabitants "are in
reality" is a totally different matter :P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/26/09 15:02, David H. Burns wrote:
> No! They've got in all wrong! It's the Earth that doesn't exist!mankind
> has far so
> long been deluded on this matter that the goddess Selene herself cannot
> rid them
> of their delusion!
I'd believe you, but I don't have a habit of listening to people who do
not exist.
--
Free advice is seldom cheap.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
news:4a6ca2fc$1@news.povray.org...
> http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm
>
> The moon does not really exist. It's all a conspiracy.
Bah! Of course moon exists, and of course it's made of green cheese. The
real riddle is, does it rotate around its own axis?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:52:50 EDT, "clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
>> I'm beginning to think that it's the part of the Earth westward of the Western
>> Isles that doesn't exist (in reality).
>
>Well, I believe that they *do* exist. But whether their inhabitants "are in
>reality" is a totally different matter :P
>
>
:D
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm
>
> The moon does not really exist. It's all a conspiracy.
>
Are people really this stupid/insane? Seriously, how can they believe
the crap they spew?
It's just like that guy Buzz Aldrin punched (well deserved, btw) I'd say
it's lunacy, but they don't believe in that anyway.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
> > http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm
> >
> > The moon does not really exist. It's all a conspiracy.
> >
> Are people really this stupid/insane? Seriously, how can they believe
> the crap they spew?
It looks like a spoof site to me.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Are people really this stupid/insane? Seriously, how can they believe
>> the crap they spew?
>
> It looks like a spoof site to me.
I think you're right, even the conspiracy believers wouldn't write something
like this:
http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/Feedback5.htm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> It looks like a spoof site to me.
Clearly Poe's law holds for more than just fundamentalism.
I thought it was a great site because it's so *obviously* whacked yet uses
all the same techniques as the other conspiracy theories use.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
back to version 1.0."
"We've done that already. We call it 2.0."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"somebody" <x### [at] ycom> wrote:
> Bah! Of course moon exists, and of course it's made of green cheese. The
> real riddle is, does it rotate around its own axis?
Depends on whether it actually rotates around the earth ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> > http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm
> >
> > The moon does not really exist. It's all a conspiracy.
> >
>
> Are people really this stupid/insane? Seriously, how can they believe
> the crap they spew?
A good question, which this site - as I guess - is all about. I can't take such
guys seriously, but at least in *this* case the crap makes perfect sense as
soon as you don't: A nice brainfuck he's pulling off there.
A meta-hoax, if you like.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"scott" <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:
> I think you're right, even the conspiracy believers wouldn't write something
> like this:
>
> http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/Feedback5.htm
I like the "statistical experiment", too (including the statement of
qualification).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> "somebody" <x### [at] ycom> wrote:
>> Bah! Of course moon exists, and of course it's made of green cheese. The
>> real riddle is, does it rotate around its own axis?
>
> Depends on whether it actually rotates around the earth ;)
It actually doesn't. It rotates around the sun. If you actually do the
math, you find that the attraction of the sun on the moon when it's on the
sunwards side of the earth is stronger than the attraction of the earth on
the moon.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
back to version 1.0."
"We've done that already. We call it 2.0."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:51:49 -0500, Mike Raiford wrote:
> I'd say
> it's lunacy
Caused by a full moon, no doubt.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> clipka wrote:
> > "somebody" <x### [at] ycom> wrote:
> >> Bah! Of course moon exists, and of course it's made of green cheese. The
> >> real riddle is, does it rotate around its own axis?
> >
> > Depends on whether it actually rotates around the earth ;)
> It actually doesn't. It rotates around the sun. If you actually do the
> math, you find that the attraction of the sun on the moon when it's on the
> sunwards side of the earth is stronger than the attraction of the earth on
> the moon.
It is possible for a body to rotate around more than one other body at
the same time.
Of course with the Earth-Moon system it gets a bit blurry because the
two bodies basically rotate around each other, rather than the Moon purely
rotating around the Earth. The deviation the Moon causes on the Earth is
rather significant (I think it's something like 5000 km).
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> > Depends on whether it actually rotates around the earth ;)
>
> It actually doesn't. It rotates around the sun. If you actually do the
> math, you find that the attraction of the sun on the moon when it's on the
> sunwards side of the earth is stronger than the attraction of the earth on
> the moon.
Oh come on, do you really believe that sun-worshipper propaganda crap? They've
been trying to hype the sun as the king of the sky ever since they put it up
there, when we all know it's no bigger than the moon. Get real man! The moon
was built first (which is why it's not burning any more these days), and
there's really no reason to give the sun any attention. It's just a poor copy
by the Japanese (which still brag with it on their national flag), envious of
the Arabs' achievement at building the moon.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> > I'd say
> > it's lunacy
>
> Caused by a full moon, no doubt.
Ha, gotcha! So you do admit that the moon is hollow - or how could it possibly
be "full" otherwise? :P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
news:web.4a6e2cc8e4cb2a56842b7b550@news.povray.org...
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> > > Depends on whether it actually rotates around the earth ;)
> > It actually doesn't. It rotates around the sun. If you actually do the
> > math, you find that the attraction of the sun on the moon when it's on
the
> > sunwards side of the earth is stronger than the attraction of the earth
on
> > the moon.
> Oh come on, do you really believe that sun-worshipper propaganda crap?
They've
> been trying to hype the sun as the king of the sky ever since they put it
up
> there, when we all know it's no bigger than the moon. Get real man! The
moon
> was built first (which is why it's not burning any more these days), and
> there's really no reason to give the sun any attention.
Plus the sun only comes out during daytime. The moon, by contrast, is much
more useful as it brightens up the night.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:41:41 -0600, somebody wrote:
> Plus the sun only comes out during daytime. The moon, by contrast, is
> much more useful as it brightens up the night.
Except for when it's either new or hanging around with the sun. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:57:19 -0400, clipka wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> > I'd say
>> > it's lunacy
>>
>> Caused by a full moon, no doubt.
>
> Ha, gotcha! So you do admit that the moon is hollow - or how could it
> possibly be "full" otherwise? :P
Of course it's hollow, where else would the cheesemakers live? ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
>
> Ha, gotcha! So you do admit that the moon is hollow - or how could it possibly
> be "full" otherwise? :P
>
There are people who actually believe the earth is hollow.
I'm sure you could find someone who believes the same about the moon,
and further, is only a hemisphere.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> Oh come on, do you really believe that sun-worshipper propaganda crap? They've
> been trying to hype the sun as the king of the sky ever since they put it up
> there, when we all know it's no bigger than the moon. Get real man! The moon
> was built first (which is why it's not burning any more these days), and
> there's really no reason to give the sun any attention. It's just a poor copy
> by the Japanese (which still brag with it on their national flag), envious of
> the Arabs' achievement at building the moon.
>
Don't forget the earth is flat, too XD
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't forget the earth is flat, too XD
Yes, but only because the Flat Earth Society conspired to bulldoze it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:34:52 -0500, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:
>clipka wrote:
>>
>> Ha, gotcha! So you do admit that the moon is hollow - or how could it possibly
>> be "full" otherwise? :P
>>
>
>There are people who actually believe the earth is hollow.
>
Like me! There is a big machine inside. Have you seen my Tina CHep animation for
this round?
>I'm sure you could find someone who believes the same about the moon,
>and further, is only a hemisphere.
Why build a whole sphere? Save material!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
>
> Like me! There is a big machine inside. Have you seen my Tina CHep animation for
> this round?
>
Not exactly, I think they think the lizard people live there or
something ...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not exactly, I think they think the lizard people live there or
> something ...
Nazis. The interior of the earth is full of Nazis, ready to dig through to the
surface as soon as Adolf is ready to Take Over the World again for another 1000
years. A bit less, maybe.
Ah well, not exactly Adolf, because Elvis wanted to have his comeback too, so
they created a genetic hybrid. Looks a bit weird, but... oh well, this Hitler
guy looked weird anyway, didn't he?
Maybe he was one of the lizard people after all, cleverly disguised...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> Nazis. The interior of the earth is full of Nazis, ready to dig through to the
> surface as soon as Adolf is ready to Take Over the World again for another 1000
> years. A bit less, maybe.
>
> Ah well, not exactly Adolf, because Elvis wanted to have his comeback too, so
> they created a genetic hybrid. Looks a bit weird, but... oh well, this Hitler
> guy looked weird anyway, didn't he?
>
> Maybe he was one of the lizard people after all, cleverly disguised...
The rabbit hole keeps getting deeper and deeper. I want out. Where's my
red pill?
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:50:41 -0500, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:
>clipka wrote:
>
>> Nazis. The interior of the earth is full of Nazis, ready to dig through to the
>> surface as soon as Adolf is ready to Take Over the World again for another 1000
>> years. A bit less, maybe.
>>
>> Ah well, not exactly Adolf, because Elvis wanted to have his comeback too, so
>> they created a genetic hybrid. Looks a bit weird, but... oh well, this Hitler
>> guy looked weird anyway, didn't he?
>>
>> Maybe he was one of the lizard people after all, cleverly disguised...
>
>The rabbit hole keeps getting deeper and deeper. I want out. Where's my
>red pill?
If the trip goes bad - Drink me ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
