 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
What's the difference between a pizza and a Jew?
A pizza is an oven-baked, flat, generally round bread that is usually
covered with tomatoes or a tomato-based sauce and often mozzarella
cheese, with other toppings added according to region, culture or
personal preference, whereas a Jew is a follower of the religion Judaism.
http://www.instantrimshot.com
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 9-6-2009 18:39, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:34:20 +0200, andrel wrote:
>
>> On 9-6-2009 18:21, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:03:33 +0200, andrel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Even if I did, why do you suppose
>>>> that I (i.e. anybody in this group) knew that, which I didn't?
>>> Well, I'd never heard of it before, but the joke had some context
>>> ("down the hill") which made me think of a car. That plus my best
>>> guess at the pronunciation identified it as a play on words.
>> Sure but even when I plugged that all in, I still did not find it funny,
>> so I assumed something else was going on. Then again, the subject was a
>> warning.
>
> Well, yeah, there is that too. :-)
>
> Along the same lines:
>
> Q. Why are you carrying that fish?
>
> A. Just for the halibut.
>
You mean like Clive Anderson asking in the last episode of Have I got
news for you after an explanation of a new cloud type: 'Are you cirrus'.
Or Stephen Fry out of character on QI with
Q: How does a chimpanzee makes toast
A: he puts it under the gorilla.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:51:33 +0200, andrel wrote:
> On 9-6-2009 18:39, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:34:20 +0200, andrel wrote:
>>
>>> On 9-6-2009 18:21, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:03:33 +0200, andrel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Even if I did, why do you suppose
>>>>> that I (i.e. anybody in this group) knew that, which I didn't?
>>>> Well, I'd never heard of it before, but the joke had some context
>>>> ("down the hill") which made me think of a car. That plus my best
>>>> guess at the pronunciation identified it as a play on words.
>>> Sure but even when I plugged that all in, I still did not find it
>>> funny, so I assumed something else was going on. Then again, the
>>> subject was a warning.
>>
>> Well, yeah, there is that too. :-)
>>
>> Along the same lines:
>>
>> Q. Why are you carrying that fish?
>>
>> A. Just for the halibut.
>>
> You mean like Clive Anderson asking in the last episode of Have I got
> news for you after an explanation of a new cloud type: 'Are you cirrus'.
>
> Or Stephen Fry out of character on QI with Q: How does a chimpanzee
> makes toast
> A: he puts it under the gorilla.
Pretty much, yeah. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible wrote:
>>> Try saying it out loud. It becomes obvious. ;-)
>>
>> Spelling it properly would probably have helped, too.
>
> Meh. It's a linguistic joke. Apparently it doesn't work so well written
> down...
Yes. But the actual model of Rolls Royce car was spelled "Canardly."
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>>>> Try saying it out loud. It becomes obvious. ;-)
>>>
>>> Spelling it properly would probably have helped, too.
>>
>> Meh. It's a linguistic joke. Apparently it doesn't work so well
>> written down...
>
> Yes. But the actual model of Rolls Royce car was spelled "Canardly."
Really? I wasn't aware there *was* such a model. I thought it was just a
made-up name that sounded plausible...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Really? I wasn't aware there *was* such a model. I thought it was just a
> made-up name that sounded plausible...
In the 1920s. GIYF.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Tim Cook wrote:
> http://www.instantrimshot.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eXj97stbG8
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 9-6-2009 20:03, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>>>> Try saying it out loud. It becomes obvious. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Spelling it properly would probably have helped, too.
>>>
>>> Meh. It's a linguistic joke. Apparently it doesn't work so well
>>> written down...
>>
>> Yes. But the actual model of Rolls Royce car was spelled "Canardly."
>
> Really? I wasn't aware there *was* such a model. I thought it was just a
> made-up name that sounded plausible...
If it disn't exist it would not be a joke, not even a lame one.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"andrel" <a_l### [at] hotmail com> a écrit dans le message de
news:4A2### [at] hotmail com...
> If it disn't exist it would not be a joke, not even a lame one.
A lame duck actually. Andrew is right, there was no Rolls-Royce model
called that. "Canard" means "duck" in French and "fake story" in English, so
I guess that joke is in using a foreign but posh-sounding name (like the
actual "Corniche" and "Camargue" RR models) and making a pun out of it.
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 9-6-2009 22:08, Gilles Tran wrote:
> "andrel" <a_l### [at] hotmail com> a écrit dans le message de
> news:4A2### [at] hotmail com...
>> If it disn't exist it would not be a joke, not even a lame one.
>
> A lame duck actually. Andrew is right, there was no Rolls-Royce model
> called that.
If you say so. Your Googling skills are way beyond mine.
> "Canard" means "duck" in French and "fake story" in English,
Derived from the French newspaper if I am not mistaken.
> so I guess that joke is in using a foreign but posh-sounding
> name (like the actual "Corniche" and "Camargue" RR models) and making a
> pun out of it.
My verdict: what a terrible 'joke'. Not even remotely funny, but 'de
gustibus non est disputandum' or the equivalent for humor.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |