 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 14 May 2009 19:53:56 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>>> Sure, but at the same time, RAH is a pretty good concert hall, so even
>>> the cheap seats will be able to hear things without too much trouble.
>>
>> Well it must be a different RAH that I know. I think that the acoustics are
>> pretty poor. Too many reflections, even with the mushrooms on the ceiling. :(
>
>Mmm, I didn't think it sounded too bad, personally...
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 14 May 2009 14:39:07 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>Well, in fairness, I've never actually been there, but I've heard it
>described as good.
>
>Maybe it takes a large crowd to get it sounding right?
It certainly has a great atmosphere. Maybe a concert that is mic'ed sounds
better but I've been to a couple of proms and unless you are in the good seats
or the choir (nice one Andrew) voices can sound drowned out or very faint.
Point of interest (or not) When the RAH was being built some boxes were sold in
perpetuum. So there are some people that have a right to go to any performance
without paying.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> It certainly has a great atmosphere. Maybe a concert that is mic'ed sounds
> better but I've been to a couple of proms and unless you are in the good seats
> or the choir (nice one Andrew) voices can sound drowned out or very faint.
When you have a 25-tonne organ with almost 10,000 pipes in it... you
don't need electronic amplification. ;-)
Heck, half the time I felt like saying to the orchestra "guys, I know
you've practiced this for months, but seriously... GO HOME! We can't
hear anything. The organ is completely drowning you lot." :-P
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 14 May 2009 22:26:19 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>
>> It certainly has a great atmosphere. Maybe a concert that is mic'ed sounds
>> better but I've been to a couple of proms and unless you are in the good seats
>> or the choir (nice one Andrew) voices can sound drowned out or very faint.
>
>When you have a 25-tonne organ with almost 10,000 pipes in it... you
>don't need electronic amplification. ;-)
>
Och! the mass pipes and drums ;)
>Heck, half the time I felt like saying to the orchestra "guys, I know
>you've practiced this for months, but seriously... GO HOME! We can't
>hear anything. The organ is completely drowning you lot." :-P
:-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Have you looked at the rest of the menu? It's pretty mental...
Looks perty good, though I'd skip the snails, they taste earthy.
(Which means they taste like chewey dirt.)
If you could find 3 other couples to split the box with, you
get a date.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 14 May 2009 22:23:39 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 14 May 2009 14:39:07 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>Well, in fairness, I've never actually been there, but I've heard it
>>described as good.
>>
>>Maybe it takes a large crowd to get it sounding right?
>
> It certainly has a great atmosphere. Maybe a concert that is mic'ed
> sounds better but I've been to a couple of proms and unless you are in
> the good seats or the choir (nice one Andrew) voices can sound drowned
> out or very faint.
That makes sense, I could see that - there is a concert hall in
Minneapolis that's kinda like that (acoustically) - you could sit in the
back of the third tier and hear the conductor wrinkle a dollar bill, but
I could see that vocal performances could sound quite muddy from time to
time if you weren't in the right place.
> Point of interest (or not) When the RAH was being built some boxes were
> sold in perpetuum. So there are some people that have a right to go to
> any performance without paying.
That is interesting. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 14 May 2009 18:16:17 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> Point of interest (or not) When the RAH was being built some boxes were
>> sold in perpetuum. So there are some people that have a right to go to
>> any performance without paying.
>
>That is interesting. :-)
I thought so. Anyway this will probably my last post for a while as I am moving
apartment and it will probably take about a fortnight to get a internet
connection set up. :(
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 16 May 2009 12:21:11 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 14 May 2009 18:16:17 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>> Point of interest (or not) When the RAH was being built some boxes
>>> were sold in perpetuum. So there are some people that have a right to
>>> go to any performance without paying.
>>
>>That is interesting. :-)
>
> I thought so. Anyway this will probably my last post for a while as I am
> moving apartment and it will probably take about a fortnight to get a
> internet connection set up. :(
Well, good luck with the move - see you in a couple of weeks.
Tunbridge Wells. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16 May 2009 14:00:17 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>Well, good luck with the move - see you in a couple of weeks.
>
Thanks 95% done :)
>Tunbridge Wells. ;-)
Nah! Uxbridge :(
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 17 May 2009 11:17:56 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 16 May 2009 14:00:17 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>
>>Well, good luck with the move - see you in a couple of weeks.
>>
>>
> Thanks 95% done :)
That was quick. :-)
>>Tunbridge Wells. ;-)
>
> Nah! Uxbridge :(
Pick up a copy of the dictionary, it's good reading. :-)
Embankment. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
