 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible schrieb:
> Of course, PDF has the advantage of being a single, compressed file with
> no possibility of broken hyperlinks / missing images / missing fonts /
> etc. But for a help file, I'd suggest that HTML is more appropriate.
> (Who the hell is going to print out 2,000 pages on actual paper?)
Especially with a help file, I might want to do a full text search now
and then.
Screw your 2000+ HTML files.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Especially with a help file, I might want to do a full text search now and
> then.
>
> Screw your 2000+ HTML files.
Isn't that what the MS help file format is for? It is basically HTML AIUI,
but it has those "Index" "Search" and "Contents" panels for
search/navigation. If you are using Visual Studio I think there was even
included a tool to build them automatically alongside your code (I never
used it though).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> (I've yet to find any browser anywhere that can print HTML properly),
>
> What you mean is that you've yet to find any HTML properly marked up for
> printing.
Printing? How many HTML files have you seen that are properly marked up
for normal display?! Usually they're just hacked together until IE
displays them properly.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:41:25 +0000, Invisible wrote:
> Of course, PDF has the advantage of being a single, compressed file with
> no possibility of broken hyperlinks / missing images / missing fonts /
> etc. But for a help file, I'd suggest that HTML is more appropriate.
> (Who the hell is going to print out 2,000 pages on actual paper?)
Broken hyperlinks is a definite possibility, both internal to the doc and
to external websites.
I've worked with Framemaker enough to know that it's possible to build a
PDF with borken internal document references, though you will get
warnings on that. It doesn't validate external links are valid or not.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/4/2009 4:53 PM, stbenge wrote:
> Personally, I think HTML help files are great, as long as everything is
> linked correctly. It's either one extra directory to the index, or one
> extra visible folder to look at. A good trade-off, IMO.
I prefer HTML to PDF too.
Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TC wrote:
> A few years ago I used the official HTML-Help compiler from Microsoft to
> produce help-files.
I know I still have that thing on my computer.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> ...you want a program that works on Windows 98?
>
> Uh, good luck with that then.
Ya! I know I should up grade. But I'm cheap :)
>
> So are you talking about *.hlp or *.chm files? They're different file
> formats.
Any thing would do. I had a nice *.hlp editor once.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> (Who the hell is going to print out 2,000 pages on actual paper?)
When I first discovered POV-Ray, I printed out the entire help file. I
don't think it was 2000 pages, but it was a big stack nevertheless :S
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Leroy Whetstone wrote:
> clipka wrote:
>
>> I personally am more in for (well-indexed) PDF files.
>
> What the BEEP. I hate PDF files with a passion.
> You know what PDF means Pretty Damned F###ed.
My biggest problem with PDFs is that people always seem to bloat the
stupid things. They end up taking forever to download. Also, the pages
skip in an annoying way while paging through them.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> Why is that?
Let's see a long long time ago I was in the middle of a then complex
program and I needed some critical information fast. So I found a PDF
with what I wanted on the net. It took for ever to download. I don't
remember what program I used to read it. But I do remember two things
the size of that PDF was out of proportion to the information on it and
it wasn't what I wanted. I hate it. I could have got to 10 web sites
in the time it took me to read that one PDF.
Later when I have some time on my hand I did a little research into
PDF. It was mainly created for secuity. They didn't what someone
changing a file with premission and passing it off as their own work.
It maght be alright for office work, But Who Cares.
>
> They give a nice, clean, consistent layout on every output device
> (including printers). HTML files, on the other hand, always have this
> subtle "half-finished" feel to them, no matter how much effort you put
> into their design.
>
I rearly print anything. If I find something interesting on the net I
download it or bookmark it.
> And you can easily do a full-text search on a PDF, which is always a
> semi-hassle with HTML help files (as they typically don't come in a
> single file).
That's why I liked a will written *.hlp file's index.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
