 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel wrote:
> YKYHBRTTL when you try to loose exactly pi kilo's per month.
Most people just try to loose the pie kilos. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> Ever see the movie Daywatch?
Daywatch and nightwatch were fabulous movies. So totally non-Hollywood in
their execution. I never got around to looking up what the russian words
written in chalk were saying - I'll have to watch that again.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
unable to read this, even at arm's length."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
> Hehe, everytime I go to Japan
Nice, I wish I could say the same, lucky you :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Interesting, I'll keep this handy, thx for the info Warp :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> I think the problem is that the route is uphill in both directions.
> (Despite this obviously being physically impossible.) Perhaps it *would*
> in fact be faster to walk it. Cycling uphill is absurdly hard.
Not impossible according to Murphy's Law. Both directions are uphill and
against the wind.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/13/2009 9:23 AM, Darren New wrote:
> Chambers wrote:
>> Ever see the movie Daywatch?
>
> Daywatch and nightwatch were fabulous movies. So totally non-Hollywood
> in their execution. I never got around to looking up what the russian
> words written in chalk were saying - I'll have to watch that again.
I just have to mention a few more things...
First, they included the best use of subtitles I have ever seen,
*anywhere*. The stylization made reading the subtitles *enjoyable*, for
crying out loud!
Second, the movies were made for about $4M US each! In other words,
each one cost less than half the original Star Wars, 30 years later!
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/12/2009 9:10 AM, Invisible wrote:
> I won't bore you with the political details. Suffice it to say that if I
> was living by myself, it would be a total non-issue. I'd buy the food I
> want to eat, and I'd eat it. The problem is my mother... Let's not even
> go into that one.
http://www.citybaseapartments.com/
http://www.metroroommates.com/city_rentals/city_intl_rentals.asp
For the second one, scroll down to the bottom and you'll see the UK
split up by city.
I don't mean to be rude by suggesting you move out, but you've brought
up your mother before, and it seems that you'd be happier living on your
own.
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/13/2009 2:09 AM, Invisible wrote:
>> dude people can WALK 4.6 miles in 1.2 hours!
>
> Er, yeah, right.
I'm a bit(ha!) chunky, and almost every day I walk 0.8 miles in under 15
minutes. That's on pace for 1.4 hours.
When I was in shape, I could have gone faster...
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
One other thing to know is that different types of carbs digest at different
speeds. There's a "glycemic index", where 100 is glucose (aka cane sugar),
<100 digests slower, >100 digests faster. Obviously you want low numbers.
Some surprising thought-to-be-healthy foods actually will screw with your
digestion as much or more than drinking a soda. Rice (at least white rice),
carrots, and a few others are worse than a spoon of sugar. Fructose actually
has a very low glycemic index, altho I don't know if the kind they use in
manufacturing is better than regular sugar. But if you want something
natural to scoop into your tea, fructose is much better for you that regular
sugar and tastes the same, for example.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
unable to read this, even at arm's length."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Hehe, everytime I go to Japan
> Nice, I wish I could say the same, lucky you :-)
Unfortunately I've never been able to spend more than 1 or 2 days actually
doing enjoyable things there, like travelling around for fun or
sight-seeing, the last couple of times I've been there have been various
reasons why I couldn't stay longer or go earlier to try and enjoy the
country. One day though :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
