 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Fun synth-pop music.
Yeah, yeah... I know...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Fun synth-pop music.
>
> Yeah, yeah... I know...
I have 3 albums by 2 Unlimited, if it makes you feel any better.
I was also given one by Scooter for Christmas. But at least I can say I
didn't *ask* for that! ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> I have 3 albums by 2 Unlimited, if it makes you feel any better.
>
> I was also given one by Scooter for Christmas. But at least I can say I
> didn't *ask* for that! ;-)
Hmmmm.. Dance music... heh... seems like I remember something of theirs
in the deep dark recesses of my mind, just can't think of it off the top
of my head.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:42:45 -0000, Mike Raiford
<"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> did spake thusly:
> Fun synth-pop music.
>
> Yeah, yeah... I know...
Hey I'm not saying a word, I mentioned listening to ONE Phil Collins song
on my local newspaper comments page and am being teased about being a fan
since.
Oh okay I like Sometimes, A Little Respect, and Stay with Me... doesn't
make me a fan all right :-P
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook v2 wrote:
>
> Hey I'm not saying a word, I mentioned listening to ONE Phil Collins
> song on my local newspaper comments page and am being teased about being
> a fan since.
lol.. Oh man....
> Oh okay I like Sometimes, A Little Respect, and Stay with Me... doesn't
> make me a fan all right :-P
>
Heh, Oldies :) Well, some of their older stuff (than those) I swear they
used an FM synth. (Yamaha?)
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:10:20 -0000, Mike Raiford
<"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> did spake thusly:
> Phil Cook v2 wrote:
>
>> Oh okay I like Sometimes, A Little Respect, and Stay with Me... doesn't
>> make me a fan all right :-P
>>
>
> Heh, Oldies :)
But of course, everyone knows that the industry stopped producing any
decent music after 1990. Anything 'good' after that is either a cover of a
pre-1990 track, emulating a pre-1990 sound or written by a pre-1990 artist.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Heh, Oldies :)
>
> But of course, everyone knows that the industry stopped producing any
> decent music after 1990. Anything 'good' after that is either a cover of
> a pre-1990 track, emulating a pre-1990 sound or written by a pre-1990
> artist.
Or rather, after that period the amount of "bad" music increased
drastically. The good stuff is still out there, it's just kinda drowned
out by all the dross.
Exhibit A: Smash Mouth.
Exhibit B: Jem.
Exhibit C: I'd say Pendulum, but that's definitely an aqcuired taste.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:23:23 -0000, "Phil Cook v2"
<phi### [at] nospamrocain freeservecouk> wrote:
>But of course, everyone knows that the industry stopped producing any
>decent music after 1990.
Don't you mean 1910? ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook v2 wrote:
>> Heh, Oldies :)
>
> But of course, everyone knows that the industry stopped producing any
> decent music after 1990. Anything 'good' after that is either a cover of
> a pre-1990 track, emulating a pre-1990 sound or written by a pre-1990
> artist.
>
There seemed to be a time when pop music wasn't so horrid. Maybe I'm
idealizing the past a bit.... but it certainly seems that way.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>
> Exhibit A: Smash Mouth.
>
I'm one of the few I think that enjoy Smash Mouth.
> Exhibit B: Jem.
Never heard of ...
> Exhibit C: I'd say Pendulum, but that's definitely an aqcuired taste.
Never heard of...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> There seemed to be a time when pop music wasn't so horrid. Maybe I'm
> idealizing the past a bit.... but it certainly seems that way.
I can remember a time when I used to hear a new tune on the radio, and
actually be excited about it because it sounded neat. [*cough* On the
other hand, that was usually because it was 2 Unlimited...]
These days, I don't even bother listening to the radio.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> These days, I don't even bother listening to the radio.
Yeah, pretty much. There was a station that played a lot of 80's music.
Supposedly they're the same format now, but all they do is play crap all
the time, now. Not worth listening to, now.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> These days, I don't even bother listening to the radio.
>
> Yeah, pretty much. There was a station that played a lot of 80's music.
> Supposedly they're the same format now, but all they do is play crap all
> the time, now. Not worth listening to, now.
I also don't watch TV any more.
I swear there used to be *interesting* programs. Stuff like Rough
Science, Scrapheap Challange, Local Heroes, Discovery, Horizon, Wildlife
on One, etc. Now all there seems to be is "reality" shows. (Uh, 12
people locked in a room for 6 weeks? What's "real" about that??)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>
> I also don't watch TV any more.
>
I still do. Mostly things like How its Made, HowStuffWorks, and the
like. I also watch House (the grumpy doctor is funny), it isn't all
reality shows.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I also don't watch TV any more.
>
> I still do. Mostly things like How its Made, HowStuffWorks, and the
> like. I also watch House (the grumpy doctor is funny), it isn't all
> reality shows.
My dad likes House. Personally, I find him annoying.
QI is sometimes quite interesting. However, it's on ridiculously late at
night for some reason.
I've yet to find anything else really interesting to watch. Hell, even
the great David Attenborough seems to produce films that are more
political activism rather than science now...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:49:29 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake thusly:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>
>> There seemed to be a time when pop music wasn't so horrid. Maybe I'm
>> idealizing the past a bit.... but it certainly seems that way.
>
> I can remember a time when I used to hear a new tune on the radio, and
> actually be excited about it because it sounded neat. [*cough* On the
> other hand, that was usually because it was 2 Unlimited...]
>
> These days, I don't even bother listening to the radio.
I catch some of the new stuff and admittedly at times it can seem quite
good or catchy; perhaps what I meant to say in a less tongue in cheek
voice was that nothing that's come out after 1990 is memorable for me
(unless cover/produced...) I just don't find myself humming anything
recent. IDK so much seems to have been tailored and tweaked to such a
gleaming 'perfection' it doesn't seem like music to me. Closest I've got
is the catch in Beyonce's Crazy in Love and I swear I've heard that before
a long time ago.
Oh side-track one of the things about getting stuck in stupid queues is
realising that of the 7 minute long Hey Jude the last 4 minutes of it is
just Na na na's :-)
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> on One, etc. Now all there seems to be is "reality" shows. (Uh, 12
I'm told by people in the business it's because you're more likely to watch
those advertisements. You see a sit-com, you're going to TiVo it and skip
the commercials and watch it tomorrow. You see a reality show, you're going
to want to gossip the next day about what happened with co-workers, so
you'll put up with the advertisements. How true or not this is I can only
judge based on my opinions of the people who told me this.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Ouch ouch ouch!"
"What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
"No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Exhibit A: Smash Mouth.
>
> I'm one of the few I think that enjoy Smash Mouth.
My dad introduced me.
Actually, my dad listens to more new stuff than I do. o_O
>> Exhibit B: Jem.
>
> Never heard of ...
Her first album was really quite fun. Arguably a little samey, but
enjoyable to listen to. Her second is... depressing. Every single song
is a sad song. I don't know why she changed direction...
>> Exhibit C: I'd say Pendulum, but that's definitely an aqcuired taste.
>
> Never heard of...
Imagine a high-wattage baseline, thunderous drum loops, and a snarling
synth lead. That's basically the template to every track they've ever
produced.
Their first album was alright, but most of the tunes are fairly "thin".
(As in, there's not much to them.) Their new album is much better. I'm
currently kinda addicted...
http://www.pendulum.com/
You'll get the idea. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> on One, etc. Now all there seems to be is "reality" shows. (Uh, 12
>
> I'm told by people in the business it's because you're more likely to
> watch those advertisements. You see a sit-com, you're going to TiVo it
> and skip the commercials and watch it tomorrow. You see a reality show,
> you're going to want to gossip the next day about what happened with
So, we get crap for the sake of ads. Nice.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> on One, etc. Now all there seems to be is "reality" shows.
>>
>> I'm told by people in the business it's because you're more likely to
>> watch those advertisements. You see a sit-com, you're going to TiVo it
>> and skip the commercials and watch it tomorrow. You see a reality
>> show, you're going to want to gossip the next day about what happened
>> with
>
> So, we get crap for the sake of ads. Nice.
Where I'm from, we get ads *for* crap!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:06:02 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>
> Where I'm from, we get ads *for* crap!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoXVjgktHbc
--
FE
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> So, we get crap for the sake of ads. Nice.
You are not the customer. You are the product.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Ouch ouch ouch!"
"What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
"No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:44:51 -0000, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
did spake thusly:
> Invisible wrote:
>> on One, etc. Now all there seems to be is "reality" shows. (Uh, 12
>
> I'm told by people in the business it's because you're more likely to
> watch those advertisements. You see a sit-com, you're going to TiVo it
> and skip the commercials and watch it tomorrow. You see a reality show,
> you're going to want to gossip the next day about what happened with
> co-workers, so you'll put up with the advertisements. How true or not
> this is I can only judge based on my opinions of the people who told me
> this.
Perhaps it's because compared to "reality" shows the adverts provide
higher production values and greater entertainment ;-)
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
>
> You are not the customer. You are the product.
>
You know, a statement like that will really screw with you.
The real clients of television are not the viewers, but the advertisers.
I'm aware of that. :)
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> You are not the customer. You are the product.
>>
>
> You know, a statement like that will really screw with you.
>
> The real clients of television are not the viewers, but the advertisers.
> I'm aware of that. :)
Not only am I a product, I am in fact faulty goods. o_O
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> QI is sometimes quite interesting.
I can't believe nobody picked up on this one. I thought it was quite
clever sneaking that one in there! ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Imagine a high-wattage baseline, thunderous drum loops, and a snarling
> synth lead. That's basically the template to every track they've ever
> produced.
>
> Their first album was alright, but most of the tunes are fairly "thin".
> (As in, there's not much to them.) Their new album is much better. I'm
> currently kinda addicted...
>
> http://www.pendulum.com/
>
> You'll get the idea. ;-)
>
Oh, nice :) I looked them up on rhapsody, and listened to a few of their
tracks. Good suggestion indeed.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Imagine a high-wattage baseline, thunderous drum loops, and a snarling
>> synth lead. That's basically the template to every track they've ever
>> produced.
>>
>> Their first album was alright, but most of the tunes are fairly
>> "thin". (As in, there's not much to them.) Their new album is much
>> better. I'm currently kinda addicted...
>>
>> http://www.pendulum.com/
>>
>> You'll get the idea. ;-)
>>
>
> Oh, nice :) I looked them up on rhapsody, and listened to a few of their
> tracks. Good suggestion indeed.
Glad to be of service.
(Even if I only found out because of |NERV|McHaggis...)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Fredrik Eriksson wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoXVjgktHbc
Suddenly the thread title takes on a new meaning... :-S
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
