 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
news:rtncm41foeamnnu001f15vmg59btr4sspn@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:38:33 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dot com> wrote:
>
>> It's not on the left like in the attached?
>
> Yes, it's not on the left like in the attached.
How strange! You don't have anything there apart from those two temps and
CPU usage. Have you tried reinstalling it?
~Steve~
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
news:496638d2$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>> No, it's what suits me and what i'm used to, it hasn't changed for
>> nearly 10 years now.
>
> One of my bosses once was color blind. He used navy blue on neon pink, and
> forest green with a bright orange background. You could blind yourself
> just walking past his office.
Yes, I've seen some websites like that. Why mention colour blindness
though? I'm colour blind, but I see blue just fine, and I see teal fine too,
(which is what my colour scheme is).
Dark blue:
http://images.google.com/images?sourceid=navclient&rls=GEUA,GEUA:2006-18,GEUA:en&q=dark%20blue&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
Teal:
http://images.google.com/images?sourceid=navclient&rls=GEUA,GEUA:2006-18,GEUA:en&q=teal%20colour&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
~Steve~
>
> It didn't help that one of the color guns was misaligned, so everything
> had a 2-pixel fringe around it he couldn't see.
>
> --
> Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
> Why is there a chainsaw in DOOM?
> There aren't any trees on Mars.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Yes, it's not on the left like in the attached.
>
> How strange! You don't have anything there apart from those two temps
> and CPU usage. Have you tried reinstalling it?
AIUI those apps have to work out from the specific motherboard and other
hardware where to read those temperatures and fan speeds from. As all
motherboards can be different and there is no standard, it is possible the
application doesn't support all hardware.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:27:43 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
>news:rtncm41foeamnnu001f15vmg59btr4sspn@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:38:33 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>>
>>> It's not on the left like in the attached?
>>
>> Yes, it's not on the left like in the attached.
>
> How strange! You don't have anything there apart from those two temps and
>CPU usage. Have you tried reinstalling it?
>
I did upgrade last week. It is a Toshiba laptop I have it installed on and I
only really care about the core temperature. Although out of curiosity I'll find
another monitoring programme and see what it shows.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"scott" <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote in message
news:49673203$1@news.povray.org...
>>> Yes, it's not on the left like in the attached.
>>
>> How strange! You don't have anything there apart from those two temps
>> and CPU usage. Have you tried reinstalling it?
>
> AIUI those apps have to work out from the specific motherboard and other
> hardware where to read those temperatures and fan speeds from. As all
> motherboards can be different and there is no standard, it is possible the
> application doesn't support all hardware.
>
>
Hmm, I just assumed that 'all' motherboards had these features (that can
be read) anyway.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
news:5sdem49em5plgtdjsi87uc977ru218tj1r@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:27:43 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
>>news:rtncm41foeamnnu001f15vmg59btr4sspn@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:38:33 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's not on the left like in the attached?
>>>
>>> Yes, it's not on the left like in the attached.
>>
>> How strange! You don't have anything there apart from those two temps
>> and
>>CPU usage. Have you tried reinstalling it?
>>
>
> I did upgrade last week. It is a Toshiba laptop I have it installed on and
> I
> only really care about the core temperature. Although out of curiosity
> I'll find
> another monitoring programme and see what it shows.
Yes, that would be interesting to see.
~Steve~
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:27:26 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>> I did upgrade last week. It is a Toshiba laptop I have it installed on and
>> I
>> only really care about the core temperature. Although out of curiosity
>> I'll find
>> another monitoring programme and see what it shows.
>
> Yes, that would be interesting to see.
Core Temp http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/ showed values for both cores but I
could not find an application that would show me the fan speeds.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
news:p3nem4l282o75tlgva0pikruatbfpdsaev@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:27:26 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>> Yes, that would be interesting to see.
>
> Core Temp http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/ showed values for both cores but
> I
> could not find an application that would show me the fan speeds.
Hmm, you're not kidding, I drew a blank too.
~Steve~
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> Yes, I've seen some websites like that. Why mention colour blindness
> though?
Because that's the reason he did it. :-)
If the blue border around the solid color at
http://images.google.com/images?um=1&hl=en&rls=GEUA%2CGEUA%3A2006-18%2CGEUA%3Aen&q=neon+pink+color&btnG=Search+Images
doesn't make your eyes ache, you *are* color blind.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Why is there a chainsaw in DOOM?
There aren't any trees on Mars.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Orchid XP v8" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:49627f38$1@news.povray.org...
> http://tinyurl.com/7jmauo
>
> Ah, I love benchmarks. You can argue about memory bandwidth or cache sizes
> or price points all day, but a benchmark shows you what's happening in the
> real world.
>
> Right, so let's look at this benchmark. The GeForce 7900 GT is *clearly*
> the loser. It has been thoroughly PWN3D in every single test. Some show
> the other cards as up to 8x faster.
>
> Now, the GeForce 280 is roughly 5x the price of the GeForce 260. And thus
> you would expect a corresponding difference in performance. I don't see
> one. Actually, in almost all cases, the two cards look remarkably similar
> in performance. The 280 is maybe 3% or even as much as 10% faster. Big
> deal. For 5x the price? I don't think I'll bother.
>
> See, that's why I love benchmarks! :-D
>
> Also... I'm loving the way even the big meat just can't handle Crysis.
> That game came out, what, 7 years ago? And *still* today no graphics card
> can run it properly. WTF? It's like the Vista of the gaming world...
>
> --
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
> http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Ummm, Crysis came out in '07 I think and my GTX280 can play it in 1080p on
my LCD TV with every graphics option switched on full and it plays fine.
There are a lot of cards that can take Crysis these days, its certainly no
where near the power hog it used to be with respect to the current crop of
hardware.
Cheers Dre
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
