I'm hunting wabbits

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin wrote:

> I'm hunting wabbits

It's duck season!

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin wrote:
> 
>> I'm hunting wabbits
> 
> It's duck season!
> 

That sir, is an inmitigated fabrication.  It's wabbit season!

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin <taustin> wrote:

>I'm hunting wabbits

Wa, wa Wabits!



Pohl and Kornbluth's Gladiators-at-law
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:41:55 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm hunting wabbits
>> 
>> It's duck season!
>> 
>> 
> That sir, is an inmitigated fabrication.  It's wabbit season!

It's duck season!

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:41:55 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
> 
>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm hunting wabbits
>>> It's duck season!
>>>
>>>
>> That sir, is an inmitigated fabrication.  It's wabbit season!
> 
> It's duck season!
> 

Wabbit season!

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:06:39 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:41:55 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>> 
>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm hunting wabbits
>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That sir, is an inmitigated fabrication.  It's wabbit season!
>> 
>> It's duck season!
>> 
>> 
> Wabbit season!

Duck season!

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:06:39 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
> 
>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:41:55 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm hunting wabbits
>>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> That sir, is an inmitigated fabrication.  It's wabbit season!
>>> It's duck season!
>>>
>>>
>> Wabbit season!
> 
> Duck season!
> 

Wabbit season!

Post a reply to this message

Last I heard, Elmer FUD (also known as Steve Ballmer) was hunting winux.

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:53:28 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:06:39 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>> 
>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:41:55 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm hunting wabbits
>>>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> That sir, is an inmitigated fabrication.  It's wabbit season!
>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Wabbit season!
>> 
>> Duck season!
>> 
>> 
> Wabbit season!

Wabbit season!

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:53:28 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
> 
>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:06:39 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:41:55 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm hunting wabbits
>>>>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> That sir, is an inmitigated fabrication.  It's wabbit season!
>>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Wabbit season!
>>> Duck season!
>>>
>>>
>> Wabbit season!
> 
> Wabbit season!

Duck season!

Post a reply to this message

Kevin Wampler wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:53:28 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:06:39 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:41:55 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm hunting wabbits
>>>>>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That sir, is an inmitigated fabrication.  It's wabbit season!
>>>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Wabbit season!
>>>> Duck season!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Wabbit season!
>>
>> Wabbit season!
> 
> Duck season!
Dude, is W A B B I T Season, check ur calendar, and let us hunt XD

Post a reply to this message

Tom Austin wrote:
> I'm hunting wabbits

	Why did I initially read that as "wumpus"?

-- 
Bozone (n.): The substance surrounding stupid people that stops bright
ideas from penetrating. The bozone layer, unfortunately, shows little
sign of breaking down in the near future.


                    /\  /\               /\  /
                   /  \/  \ u e e n     /  \/  a w a z
                       >>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
                                   anl

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:06:10 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:53:28 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>> 
>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:06:39 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:41:55 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm hunting wabbits
>>>>>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That sir, is an inmitigated fabrication.  It's wabbit season!
>>>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Wabbit season!
>>>> Duck season!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Wabbit season!
>> 
>> Wabbit season!
> 
> Duck season!

Fire! :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:06:10 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
> 
>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:53:28 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:06:39 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:41:55 -0800, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:13 -0500, Tom Austin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm hunting wabbits
>>>>>>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That sir, is an inmitigated fabrication.  It's wabbit season!
>>>>>>> It's duck season!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wabbit season!
>>>>> Duck season!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Wabbit season!
>>> Wabbit season!
>> Duck season!
> 
> Fire! :-)
> 

You're despicable

Post a reply to this message

Hehehehehehehehehe. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson wrote:
> Hehehehehehehehehe. ;-)

You pair of geniuses, you. :)

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:00:52 +0000, Bill Pragnell wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Hehehehehehehehehe. ;-)
> 
> You pair of geniuses, you. :)

It's a tough job, but someone's gotta do it. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 26 Nov 2008 15:38:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:00:52 +0000, Bill Pragnell wrote:
>
>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Hehehehehehehehehe. ;-)
>> 
>> You pair of geniuses, you. :)
>
>It's a tough job, but someone's gotta do it. ;-)
>
>Jim

I cannot believe the pair of you.

<Shakes head and walks away mumbling>

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Hehehehehehehehehe. ;-)
> 
> You pair of geniuses, you. :)

You're too kind :)

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:04:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 26 Nov 2008 15:38:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:00:52 +0000, Bill Pragnell wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> Hehehehehehehehehe. ;-)
>>> 
>>> You pair of geniuses, you. :)
>>
>>It's a tough job, but someone's gotta do it. ;-)
>>
>>Jim
> 
> I cannot believe the pair of you.

Well, I'd try to sell you a bridge.... ;-)

> <Shakes head and walks away mumbling>

LOL

Post a reply to this message

On 1 Dec 2008 13:11:15 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>Well, I'd try to sell you a bridge.... ;-)
>
No you won't!

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:35:23 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 1 Dec 2008 13:11:15 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Well, I'd try to sell you a bridge.... ;-)
>>
> No you won't!

I said I'd *try*, not that I'd *succeed* at it. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 1 Dec 2008 18:34:13 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:35:23 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 1 Dec 2008 13:11:15 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Well, I'd try to sell you a bridge.... ;-)
>>>
>> No you won't!
>
>I said I'd *try*, not that I'd *succeed* at it. ;-)
>

You didn't bite then :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:34:41 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 1 Dec 2008 18:34:13 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:35:23 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 1 Dec 2008 13:11:15 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>Well, I'd try to sell you a bridge.... ;-)
>>>>
>>> No you won't!
>>
>>I said I'd *try*, not that I'd *succeed* at it. ;-)
>>
>>
> You didn't bite then :)

You're not the first person to say that to me. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 2 Dec 2008 13:09:54 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:34:41 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>> You didn't bite then :)
>
>You're not the first person to say that to me. ;-)

Hmm! You must be trustworthy ;)
I'm not going to go any further down that road :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:22:16 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 2 Dec 2008 13:09:54 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:34:41 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> 
>>> You didn't bite then :)
>>
>>You're not the first person to say that to me. ;-)
> 
> Hmm! You must be trustworthy ;)

LOL, just trying to see if you'd take the bait. :-)

> I'm not going to go any further down that road :)

Probably a wise decision.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 2 Dec 2008 14:05:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> Hmm! You must be trustworthy ;)
>
>LOL, just trying to see if you'd take the bait. :-)
>
>> I'm not going to go any further down that road :)
>
>Probably a wise decision.

Sorry, I can't speak, my mouth is full.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:42:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 2 Dec 2008 14:05:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> Hmm! You must be trustworthy ;)
>>
>>LOL, just trying to see if you'd take the bait. :-)
>>
>>> I'm not going to go any further down that road :)
>>
>>Probably a wise decision.
> 
> Sorry, I can't speak, my mouth is full.

That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 2 Dec 2008 15:01:37 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:42:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 2 Dec 2008 14:05:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>> Hmm! You must be trustworthy ;)
>>>
>>>LOL, just trying to see if you'd take the bait. :-)
>>>
>>>> I'm not going to go any further down that road :)
>>>
>>>Probably a wise decision.
>> 
>> Sorry, I can't speak, my mouth is full.
>
>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>
I have a cold!
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:08:51 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 2 Dec 2008 15:01:37 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:42:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 2 Dec 2008 14:05:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Hmm! You must be trustworthy ;)
>>>>
>>>>LOL, just trying to see if you'd take the bait. :-)
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not going to go any further down that road :)
>>>>
>>>>Probably a wise decision.
>>> 
>>> Sorry, I can't speak, my mouth is full.
>>
>>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>>
> I have a cold!

But you didn't say "miss"! ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 2 Dec 2008 18:17:02 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:08:51 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 2 Dec 2008 15:01:37 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:42:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2 Dec 2008 14:05:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> Hmm! You must be trustworthy ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>LOL, just trying to see if you'd take the bait. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not going to go any further down that road :)
>>>>>
>>>>>Probably a wise decision.
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry, I can't speak, my mouth is full.
>>>
>>>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>>>
>> I have a cold!
>
>But you didn't say "miss"! ;-)
>

OK then, I miss you ;)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:24:05 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>>>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>>>>
>>> I have a cold!
>>
>>But you didn't say "miss"! ;-)
>>
> OK then, I miss you ;)

Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)

(Now tell me, honestly, how could I *not* reply in that manner?)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 3 Dec 2008 12:23:21 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:24:05 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>>>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> I have a cold!
>>>
>>>But you didn't say "miss"! ;-)
>>>
>> OK then, I miss you ;)
>
>Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)
>

What ever turns you on, Jim ;)

>(Now tell me, honestly, how could I *not* reply in that manner?)
>

No need to be shy, just unburden yourself, in all confidence.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:02:08 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 3 Dec 2008 12:23:21 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:24:05 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>>>That doesn't seem to have stopped you from typing. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> I have a cold!
>>>>
>>>>But you didn't say "miss"! ;-)
>>>>
>>> OK then, I miss you ;)
>>
>>Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)
>>
> What ever turns you on, Jim ;)

Well, the other way to respond would've been to ask how well adjusted the 
scope is on that rifle.... ;-)

>>(Now tell me, honestly, how could I *not* reply in that manner?)
>>
> No need to be shy, just unburden yourself, in all confidence.

LOL

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 3 Dec 2008 19:48:32 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>>>Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)
>>>
>> What ever turns you on, Jim ;)
>
>Well, the other way to respond would've been to ask how well adjusted the 
>scope is on that rifle.... ;-)

Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:53:45 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 3 Dec 2008 19:48:32 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>>>Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)
>>>>
>>> What ever turns you on, Jim ;)
>>
>>Well, the other way to respond would've been to ask how well adjusted
>>the scope is on that rifle.... ;-)
> 
> Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL

I don't think I need to. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 5 Dec 2008 12:04:55 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:53:45 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 3 Dec 2008 19:48:32 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>Awww, isn't that sweet? ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> What ever turns you on, Jim ;)
>>>
>>>Well, the other way to respond would've been to ask how well adjusted
>>>the scope is on that rifle.... ;-)
>> 
>> Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL
>
>I don't think I need to. ;-)

It's OK, we have a special relationship ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:21:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>> Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL
>>
>>I don't think I need to. ;-)
> 
> It's OK, we have a special relationship ;)

Apparently. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 5 Dec 2008 15:18:38 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:21:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL
>>>
>>>I don't think I need to. ;-)
>> 
>> It's OK, we have a special relationship ;)
>
>Apparently. ;-)
>

Who's going to have the last word?
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:17:55 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 5 Dec 2008 15:18:38 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:21:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> Remind me again what part of the world you live in? LOL
>>>>
>>>>I don't think I need to. ;-)
>>> 
>>> It's OK, we have a special relationship ;)
>>
>>Apparently. ;-)
>>
>>
> Who's going to have the last word?

Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> Who's going to have the last word?
>
>Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>

It does at the moment :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>
> 
> It does at the moment :)

No it doesn't ;P

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:13:38 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>
>> 
>> It does at the moment :)
>
>No it doesn't ;P

Yes, it does :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:13:38 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>
>>> It does at the moment :)
>> No it doesn't ;P
> 
> Yes, it does :)

Nuh uh ...

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:40:48 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:13:38 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>>
>>>> It does at the moment :)
>>> No it doesn't ;P
>> 
>> Yes, it does :)
>
>Nuh uh ...

Oh! Yes it does!

(The Panto season is upon us :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:40:48 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:13:38 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>>>
>>>>> It does at the moment :)
>>>> No it doesn't ;P
>>> Yes, it does :)
>> Nuh uh ...
> 
> Oh! Yes it does!
> 

Does not!


-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:29:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>
>>Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>
>>
> It does at the moment :)

But which moment?  You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 12:22:08 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:40:48 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:13:38 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It does at the moment :)
>>>>> No it doesn't ;P
>>>> Yes, it does :)
>>> Nuh uh ...
>> 
>> Oh! Yes it does!
>> 
>
>Does not!

Oh! No it doesn't!
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 8 Dec 2008 13:53:50 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:29:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>
>>>Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>
>>>
>> It does at the moment :)
>
>But which moment?  You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)
>

The moment furthest from the fulcrum ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message