 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:40:38 +0200, andrel wrote:
> On 30-3-2009 19:42, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:20:19 -0700, Darren New wrote:
>>
>>> Get a room, you two!
>>
>> Score one monitor!
>
> What has that lizard got to do with this?
Salvador Dali.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:25:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2009 13:42:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 Mar 2009 11:17:35 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:38:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mumble, mumble, mumble :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Huh? ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Uh! :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Ah. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm ;)
>>>>
>>>>MMM? ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Aaaah!
>>
>>Oh?
>
> Hmm.
Erm?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:51:45 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:38:17 -0500, Mike Raiford
> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Stephen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:09:03 -0500, Mike Raiford
>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> pfffff....
>>>
>>> Wheesht! :)
>>
>>Graaaaaak
>
> Grok ;-)
Bzzzt!
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:19:56 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> As an aside.
>
> http://literalbarrage.org/blog/archives/2005/01/19/your-scottish-slang-
word-o-the-day-wabbit/
Interesting. So I guess that means it's time to hibernate?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 30 Mar 2009 19:06:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:25:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 30 Mar 2009 13:42:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 11:17:35 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:38:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mumble, mumble, mumble :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Huh? ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Uh! :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Ah. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>MMM? ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Aaaah!
>>>
>>>Oh?
>>
>> Hmm.
>
>Erm?
Oh! Bugrit. Mouchie!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 30 Mar 2009 19:08:27 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:19:56 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> As an aside.
>>
>> http://literalbarrage.org/blog/archives/2005/01/19/your-scottish-slang-
>word-o-the-day-wabbit/
>
>Interesting. So I guess that means it's time to hibernate?
>
Or fly north for the summer.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:09:31 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2009 19:08:27 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:19:56 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> As an aside.
>>>
>>> http://literalbarrage.org/blog/archives/2005/01/19/your-scottish-
slang-
>>word-o-the-day-wabbit/
>>
>>Interesting. So I guess that means it's time to hibernate?
>>
>>
> Or fly north for the summer.
I'd go for that, too. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:08:38 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2009 19:06:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:25:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 Mar 2009 13:42:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 11:17:35 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:38:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Mumble, mumble, mumble :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Huh? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Uh! :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Ah. ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmm ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>MMM? ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Aaaah!
>>>>
>>>>Oh?
>>>
>>> Hmm.
>>
>>Erm?
>
> Oh! Bugrit. Mouchie!
Achoo!
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:08:38 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 30 Mar 2009 19:06:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:25:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 13:42:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 11:17:35 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:38:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mumble, mumble, mumble :)
>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>> Uh! :)
>>>>>>>>> Ah. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmm ;)
>>>>>>> MMM? ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aaaah!
>>>>> Oh?
>>>> Hmm.
>>> Erm?
>> Oh! Bugrit. Mouchie!
>
> Achoo!
Snort!
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 31 Mar 2009 14:43:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:08:38 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 30 Mar 2009 19:06:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:25:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 13:42:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 11:17:35 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:38:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mumble, mumble, mumble :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Huh? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Uh! :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Ah. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmm ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>MMM? ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aaaah!
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh?
>>>>
>>>> Hmm.
>>>
>>>Erm?
>>
>> Oh! Bugrit. Mouchie!
>
>Achoo!
Gesundheit.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:42:28 -0500, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Snort!
No worries :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:42:28 -0500, Mike Raiford wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:08:38 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 Mar 2009 19:06:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:25:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 13:42:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 11:17:35 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:38:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mumble, mumble, mumble :)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>> Uh! :)
>>>>>>>>>> Ah. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmm ;)
>>>>>>>> MMM? ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aaaah!
>>>>>> Oh?
>>>>> Hmm.
>>>> Erm?
>>> Oh! Bugrit. Mouchie!
>>
>> Achoo!
>
> Snort!
Pffft
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:50:48 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2009 14:43:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:08:38 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 Mar 2009 19:06:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:25:27 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 13:42:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:26 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2009 11:17:35 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:38:01 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mumble, mumble, mumble :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Huh? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Uh! :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Ah. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmm ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>MMM? ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aaaah!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm.
>>>>
>>>>Erm?
>>>
>>> Oh! Bugrit. Mouchie!
>>
>>Achoo!
>
> Gesundheit.
Mumble
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
> Mumble
Can I interject something?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:53:41 -0400, Charles C wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> Mumble
>
> Can I interject something?
Uh huh. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Tom Austin wrote:
> Tom Austin wrote:
>> I'm hunting wabbits
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5szayh
http://www.ilovewavs.com/comedy/PrankPhone/
check the Arnold Schwarzenegger Impersonator pranks some make me LOL :-D
all except one are peaces of sound tracks of movies of Arnold
Schwarzenegger.
Have a laugh.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
This isn't quite at all cartoon physics but I'm sure there's got to be a name
for the forces involved:
http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/12/ski-jump-toilet/
Charles
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:00:36 -0400, Charles C wrote:
> This isn't quite at all cartoon physics but I'm sure there's got to be a
> name for the forces involved:
> http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/12/ski-jump-toilet/
>
> Charles
LOL, I'd have to admit, that the first reaction I had was that your
question was "there's gotta be a name for this", to which the answer is
"incredibly silly". "Cold" also comes to mind, as does "potentially very
messy". But then I reread and saw that that wasn't the question you were
suggesting. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |