Stephen wrote:
> Oh! No it doesn't!

Oh, this is arguments. Abuse is down the hall.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
   see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On 8 Dec 2008 13:53:50 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:29:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It does at the moment :)
>> But which moment?  You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)
>>
> 
> The moment furthest from the fulcrum ;)

Keep it up guys, see if you can get Thunderbird's indentation to stretch 
to the moon.

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:28:11 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> Oh! No it doesn't!
>
>Oh, this is arguments. Abuse is down the hall.

Oh! Not it's not ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On 8 Dec 2008 13:53:50 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:29:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It does at the moment :)
>> But which moment?  You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)
>>
> 
> The moment furthest from the fulcrum ;)

My evil twin will have the last word.

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> On 8 Dec 2008 13:53:50 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:29:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> It does at the moment :)
>>> But which moment?  You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)
>>>
>>
>> The moment furthest from the fulcrum ;)
> 
> Keep it up guys, see if you can get Thunderbird's indentation to stretch 
> to the moon.


sorry - I just thought that without our mascot around it was quiet and I 
would try to hunt wabbits.

I didn't realize that they were on the moon.

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:18:58 +0000, Bill Pragnell <bil### [at] hotmailcom>
wrote:


>Keep it up guys, see if you can get Thunderbird's indentation to stretch 
>to the moon.

Oh! No we won't!
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:01:32 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:

>My evil twin will have the last word.

Oh! No he won't!
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:01:32 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> My evil twin will have the last word.
> 
> Oh! No he won't!

Yes he will. Just watch. :)

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:34:07 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Yes he will. Just watch. :)

Do you do "Panto" in the states?
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:06:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>But which moment?  You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)
>>
>>
> The moment furthest from the fulcrum ;)

Was that supposed to not make sense?

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:01:32 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:

> Stephen wrote:
>> On 8 Dec 2008 13:53:50 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:29:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> It does at the moment :)
>>> But which moment?  You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)
>>>
>>>
>> The moment furthest from the fulcrum ;)
> 
> My evil twin will have the last word.

No, I will. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:49:07 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:34:07 -0600, Mike Raiford
> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>Yes he will. Just watch. :)
> 
> Do you do "Panto" in the states?

We don't, but some of us know what it is. :-)

I particularly like last years' with Brian Blessed and David Tennant.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 8 Dec 2008 18:11:58 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:06:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>But which moment?  You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)
>>>
>>>
>> The moment furthest from the fulcrum ;)
>
>Was that supposed to not make sense?
>

Time for bed as it makes perfect sense to this tired mechanic ;)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 8 Dec 2008 18:15:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:49:07 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:34:07 -0600, Mike Raiford
>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>Yes he will. Just watch. :)
>> 
>> Do you do "Panto" in the states?
>
>We don't, but some of us know what it is. :-)
>

Ah!

>I particularly like last years' with Brian Blessed and David Tennant.
>

Whivh one were they in?

Brian Blessed is so OTT :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:16:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 8 Dec 2008 18:11:58 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:06:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>But which moment?  You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The moment furthest from the fulcrum ;)
>>
>>Was that supposed to not make sense?
>>
>>
> Time for bed as it makes perfect sense to this tired mechanic ;)

Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:18:30 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 8 Dec 2008 18:15:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:49:07 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:34:07 -0600, Mike Raiford
>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Yes he will. Just watch. :)
>>> 
>>> Do you do "Panto" in the states?
>>
>>We don't, but some of us know what it is. :-)
>>
> Ah!

But then again, some of us are Americans who could pass for British if it 
weren't for the American accents. ;-)

>>I particularly like last years' with Brian Blessed and David Tennant.
>>
>>
> Whivh one were they in?

Cinderella on Virgin Radio.

> Brian Blessed is so OTT :)

Well, *yeah*, one of my favourite reasons for watching the first 
Blackadder series.  Didn't really care for Edmund in that one, but King 
Richard was a blast to watch.

"Whaaaat?"

You heard me. :-)

And of course in Blackadder's Christmas Carol.  I'd love to see him in 
something more serious, but at the same time, it'd be hard to picture him 
as anyone other than King Richard. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 8 Dec 2008 23:43:30 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:16:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 8 Dec 2008 18:11:58 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:06:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>But which moment?  You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The moment furthest from the fulcrum ;)
>>>
>>>Was that supposed to not make sense?
>>>
>>>
>> Time for bed as it makes perfect sense to this tired mechanic ;)
>
>Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>

No?

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 8 Dec 2008 23:46:21 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>> Brian Blessed is so OTT :)
>
>Well, *yeah*, one of my favourite reasons for watching the first 
>Blackadder series.  Didn't really care for Edmund in that one, but King 
>Richard was a blast to watch.

I remember from way back as PC "Fancy" Smith in Z cars. I never watched
Blackadder partly because I was working offshore and partly because I don't like
Rowan Atkinson. If you can find a copy of the BBC series "I, Claudius" he played
Caesar Augustus. Also he played Mr. Western in the TV series "The History of Tom
Jones, a Foundling" 1997.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:01:32 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
> 
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On 8 Dec 2008 13:53:50 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:29:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5 Dec 2008 17:31:42 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who's going to have the last word?
>>>>>> Well, you said "last word", so does that mean you had it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> It does at the moment :)
>>>> But which moment?  You don't at this particular moment, I do. :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The moment furthest from the fulcrum ;)
>> My evil twin will have the last word.
> 
> No, I will. ;-)
> 

You sure about that?


-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>
>>
> No?

No. :-)

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:36:29 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:

>> No, I will. ;-)
>> 
>> 
> You sure about that?

Fairly sure. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:28:45 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 8 Dec 2008 23:46:21 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>> Brian Blessed is so OTT :)
>>
>>Well, *yeah*, one of my favourite reasons for watching the first
>>Blackadder series.  Didn't really care for Edmund in that one, but King
>>Richard was a blast to watch.
> 
> I remember from way back as PC "Fancy" Smith in Z cars. I never watched
> Blackadder partly because I was working offshore and partly because I
> don't like Rowan Atkinson. If you can find a copy of the BBC series "I,
> Claudius" he played Caesar Augustus. Also he played Mr. Western in the
> TV series "The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling" 1997.

Interesting, I'll have to check those out.  But you don't like Atkinson?  
Why?

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 9 Dec 2008 12:01:45 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>Interesting, I'll have to check those out.  But you don't like Atkinson?  
>Why?

You should especially "I, Claudius"
I find him more embarrassing than funny and there is another reason that I won't
go into ^_^
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> No?
>
>No. :-)

No!
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No?
>> No. :-)
> 
> No!

Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

Mike Raiford wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> No?
>>> No. :-)
>>
>> No!
> 
> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
> 
Sure.

-- Arttu Voutilainen

Post a reply to this message

Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> No?
>>>> No. :-)
>>> No!
>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>
> Sure.
> 

Thanks.


-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

Mike Raiford wrote:
> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No?
>>>>> No. :-)
>>>> No!
>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>
>> Sure.
>>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 

I can has that as your last word?

Post a reply to this message

Mike Raiford wrote:
> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No?
>>>>> No. :-)
>>>> No!
>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>
>> Sure.
>>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 

You're welcome.

-- Arttu Voutilainen

Post a reply to this message

Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>> No!
>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>>
>>> Sure.
>>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
> 
> You're welcome.

You do realize that if he understands that in wrong way, you do live
nearer to the airport than I.

> -- Arttu Voutilainen

-Aero

Post a reply to this message

Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>>>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>>> No!
>>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>>>
>>>> Sure.
>>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>> You're welcome.
> 
> You do realize that if he understands that in wrong way, you do live
> nearer to the airport than I.
> 

Haha What?
-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

Mike Raiford wrote:
> Eero Ahonen wrote:
>> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>>>>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>>>> No!
>>>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You're welcome.
>>
>> You do realize that if he understands that in wrong way, you do live
>> nearer to the airport than I.
>>
> 
> Haha What?

There's two meaning for the word-pair "You're welcome" ;).

-Aero

Post a reply to this message

Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>> Eero Ahonen wrote:
>>> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>>>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>>> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>>>>>> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>>>>> No!
>>>>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You're welcome.
>>> You do realize that if he understands that in wrong way, you do live
>>> nearer to the airport than I.
>>>
>> Haha What?
> 
> There's two meaning for the word-pair "You're welcome" ;).
> 
> -Aero

But, he doesn't know where I live, but he can find out where zbxt.net is
located, right? :P

-- Arttu Voutilainen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> No?
>>> No. :-)
>> 
>> No!
>
>Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?

All right then, since you ask so prettily 
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
> 
> But, he doesn't know where I live, but he can find out where zbxt.net is
> located, right? :P

Well, that is pretty much true :p.

> -- Arttu Voutilainen

-Aero

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> No?
>>>> No. :-)
>>> No!
>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
> 
> All right then, since you ask so prettily 

Awwe, thanks!

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Arttu Voutilainen wrote:
>> But, he doesn't know where I live, but he can find out where zbxt.net is
>> located, right? :P
> 
> Well, that is pretty much true :p.
> 

I may be crazy, but not that crazy. :)And it looks like you're somewhere 
in Finland, btw ;)

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

Mike Raiford wrote:
> 
> I may be crazy, but not that crazy. :)

You never know, when someone's from the Internet ;).

> And it looks like you're somewhere
> in Finland, btw ;)

True. Luckily no-one knows that gxblt.zbxt.net is lying on my living
room at the moment... Oops, well, at least I can also tell that it's
retired and the machine now seen as zbxt.net/gxblt.zbxt.net is named
groamba - and the machine that answers to all of your possible network
calls is actually grunka (which, via SMTP, introduces itself as
brandher) ;).

-Aero

Post a reply to this message

Eero Ahonen wrote:
> True. Luckily no-one knows that gxblt.zbxt.net is lying on my living
> room at the moment... Oops, well, at least I can also tell that it's
> retired and the machine now seen as zbxt.net/gxblt.zbxt.net is named
> groamba - and the machine that answers to all of your possible network
> calls is actually grunka (which, via SMTP, introduces itself as
> brandher) ;).

I'm really hoping you're not a native speaker of English right now. ;-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
   see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.

Post a reply to this message

Darren New wrote:
> 
> I'm really hoping you're not a native speaker of English right now. ;-)
> 

I'm not. Happy now?

-Aero

Post a reply to this message

Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> I'm really hoping you're not a native speaker of English right now. ;-)
> I'm not. Happy now?

Much better, much better. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
   see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:06:04 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 9 Dec 2008 12:01:45 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Interesting, I'll have to check those out.  But you don't like Atkinson?
>>Why?
> 
> You should especially "I, Claudius"

I'll add that to my list. :-)  My wife will be happy, I don't doubt.

> I find him more embarrassing than funny and there is another reason that
> I won't go into ^_^

Oh?  Now why won't you go into it? ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:

> Stephen wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No?
>>>>> No. :-)
>>>> No!
>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>> 
>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
> 
> Awwe, thanks!

No!  I forbid it! :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message 
news:49400689$1@news.povray.org...
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>> No!
>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>
>>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
>>
>> Awwe, thanks!
>
> No!  I forbid it! :-)

   Could you please stop shouting, I'm hunting wabbits too.  >:o(


    ~Steve~  :op


>
> Jim

Post a reply to this message

St. wrote:
> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message 
> news:49400689$1@news.povray.org...
>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>>> No!
>>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
>>> Awwe, thanks!
>> No!  I forbid it! :-)
> 
>    Could you please stop shouting, I'm hunting wabbits too.  >:o(
> 

Yeah.. so it ends ... HERE.

Hah! See that? That's me getting the last word! Hah! haha!
-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

"Mike Raiford" <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:49401a44$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message 
>> news:49400689$1@news.povray.org...
>>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>>>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>>>> No!
>>>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
>>>> Awwe, thanks!
>>> No!  I forbid it! :-)
>>
>>    Could you please stop shouting, I'm hunting wabbits too.  >:o(
>>
>
> Yeah.. so it ends ... HERE.
>
> Hah! See that? That's me getting the last word! Hah! haha!

   Lol, you gotta be kiddin' mate... I have the patience of a....


    ...St.  ;)

    ~Steve~

> -- 
> ~Mike

Post a reply to this message

St. wrote:
> "Mike Raiford" <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:49401a44$1@news.povray.org...
>> St. wrote:
>>> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message 
>>> news:49400689$1@news.povray.org...
>>>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>>>>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>>>>> No!
>>>>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>>>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
>>>>> Awwe, thanks!
>>>> No!  I forbid it! :-)
>>>    Could you please stop shouting, I'm hunting wabbits too.  >:o(
>>>
>> Yeah.. so it ends ... HERE.
>>
>> Hah! See that? That's me getting the last word! Hah! haha!
> 
>    Lol, you gotta be kiddin' mate... I have the patience of a....
> 

No, no kidding. See? I did it again!

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

On 10-Dec-08 22:04, Mike Raiford wrote:
> St. wrote:
>> "Mike Raiford" <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>> news:49401a44$1@news.povray.org...
>>> St. wrote:
>>>> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message 
>>>> news:49400689$1@news.povray.org...
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:22:43 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:53:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
>>>>>>> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9 Dec 2008 12:00:43 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:34:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who still hasn't gotten in the last word. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No?
>>>>>>>>>> No. :-)
>>>>>>>>> No!
>>>>>>>> Umm.. Yes? I can has last word?
>>>>>>> All right then, since you ask so prettily
>>>>>> Awwe, thanks!
>>>>> No!  I forbid it! :-)
>>>>    Could you please stop shouting, I'm hunting wabbits too.  >:o(
>>>>
>>> Yeah.. so it ends ... HERE.
>>>
>>> Hah! See that? That's me getting the last word! Hah! haha!
>>
>>    Lol, you gotta be kiddin' mate... I have the patience of a....
>>
> 
> No, no kidding. See? I did it again!
> 
Brilliant, congratulations to a job well done.

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:18:32 +0000, St. wrote:

>    Could you please stop shouting, I'm hunting wabbits too.  >:o(

But it's duck season! :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:34:49 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:

> Yeah.. so it ends ... HERE.
> 
> Hah! See that? That's me getting the last word! Hah! haha!

No it isn't.  This ----> is.

Post a reply to this message