On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:29:01 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>>>That's why I have mp3s. :-)
>>>>
>>> Woosh!
>>
>>You know, mp3s, audio files so you don't have to catch it on the radio.
>>;-)
>>
> Then why do you have to wait till you're off the computer?

I don't - I can multitask. ;-)

> Newfangled poopah!

LOL.

>>> Upminster.
>>
>>I couldn've sworn that rule 37b said....oh, never mind. ;-)
>>
>>Harlesden
>>
> But rule 37c says you can :)

Yeah, that's why I stopped. :-)

> Royal Oak, I'll nip into the library while I'm waiting.

Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 8 Mar 2009 16:03:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:29:01 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>>>That's why I have mp3s. :-)
>>>>>
>>>> Woosh!
>>>
>>>You know, mp3s, audio files so you don't have to catch it on the radio.
>>>;-)
>>>
>> Then why do you have to wait till you're off the computer?
>
>I don't - I can multitask. ;-)
>

But real men can't do that ;)

>> Newfangled poopah!
>
>LOL.
>
>>>> Upminster.
>>>
>>>I couldn've sworn that rule 37b said....oh, never mind. ;-)
>>>
>>>Harlesden
>>>
>> But rule 37c says you can :)
>
>Yeah, that's why I stopped. :-)
>
>> Royal Oak, I'll nip into the library while I'm waiting.
>
>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.
>

Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:40:32 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>>>You know, mp3s, audio files so you don't have to catch it on the
>>>>radio. ;-)
>>>>
>>> Then why do you have to wait till you're off the computer?
>>
>>I don't - I can multitask. ;-)
>>
> But real men can't do that ;)

What?  Sorry, I was working on something else.  Oh, I see what you 
mean. ;-)

>>> Newfangled poopah!
>>
>>LOL.
>>
>>>>> Upminster.
>>>>
>>>>I couldn've sworn that rule 37b said....oh, never mind. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>Harlesden
>>>>
>>> But rule 37c says you can :)
>>
>>Yeah, that's why I stopped. :-)
>>
>>> Royal Oak, I'll nip into the library while I'm waiting.
>>
>>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.
>>
> Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"

What, Golder's Green?

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 8 Mar 2009 23:55:41 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:


>What?  Sorry, I was working on something else.  Oh, I see what you 
>mean. ;-)

LOL

>
>>>> Newfangled poopah!
>>>
>>>LOL.
>>>
>>>>>> Upminster.
>>>>>
>>>>>I couldn've sworn that rule 37b said....oh, never mind. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>Harlesden
>>>>>
>>>> But rule 37c says you can :)
>>>
>>>Yeah, that's why I stopped. :-)
>>>
>>>> Royal Oak, I'll nip into the library while I'm waiting.
>>>
>>>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.
>>>
>> Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"
>
>What, Golder's Green?
>

Was that a question or a move?

If it was a move then mine is "Archway" if not

BUZZ! :)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:39:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>>>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.
>>>>
>>> Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"
>>
>>What, Golder's Green?
>>
> Was that a question or a move?
> 
> If it was a move then mine is "Archway" if not
> 
> BUZZ! :)

Obviously it was a move, otherwise I got "Buzzed" and missed a turn.  The 
other way around, you missed a turn. :-)

Paddington.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 9 Mar 2009 15:02:20 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:39:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>>>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.
>>>>>
>>>> Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"
>>>
>>>What, Golder's Green?
>>>
>> Was that a question or a move?
>> 
>> If it was a move then mine is "Archway" if not
>> 
>> BUZZ! :)
>
>Obviously it was a move, otherwise I got "Buzzed" and missed a turn.  The 
>other way around, you missed a turn. :-)
>
>Paddington.
>

And?
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:09:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 9 Mar 2009 15:02:20 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:39:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>>>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see
>>>>>>there.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"
>>>>
>>>>What, Golder's Green?
>>>>
>>> Was that a question or a move?
>>> 
>>> If it was a move then mine is "Archway" if not
>>> 
>>> BUZZ! :)
>>
>>Obviously it was a move, otherwise I got "Buzzed" and missed a turn. 
>>The other way around, you missed a turn. :-)
>>
>>Paddington.
>>
>>
> And?

And that was my move. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 9 Mar 2009 18:46:49 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>>>Paddington.
>>>
>>>
>> And?
>
>And that was my move. ;-)

Arggg! I'm loosing it.

(I was there earlier today)

Bayswater.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:06:14 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 9 Mar 2009 18:46:49 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>>>Paddington.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> And?
>>
>>And that was my move. ;-)
> 
> Arggg! I'm loosing it.
> 
> (I was there earlier today)

I guess I have to buzz you then for hesitation. ;-)

BUZZ!

> Bayswater.

Notting Hill Gate.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 9 Mar 2009 19:12:19 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:06:14 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 9 Mar 2009 18:46:49 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>Paddington.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> And?
>>>
>>>And that was my move. ;-)
>> 
>> Arggg! I'm loosing it.
>> 
>> (I was there earlier today)
>
>I guess I have to buzz you then for hesitation. ;-)
>

Twice.

>BUZZ!
>
>> Bayswater.
>
>Notting Hill Gate.
>

Queensway.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:39:38 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>> Arggg! I'm loosing it.
>>> 
>>> (I was there earlier today)
>>
>>I guess I have to buzz you then for hesitation. ;-)
>>
>>
> Twice.

Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)

BUZZ!

>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>
> Queensway.

Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)

Manor House.

Post a reply to this message

On 10 Mar 2009 13:11:06 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:39:38 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> Arggg! I'm loosing it.
>>>> 
>>>> (I was there earlier today)
>>>
>>>I guess I have to buzz you then for hesitation. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> Twice.
>
>Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)
>
>BUZZ!
>

BUZZ! 

Deviation from the game as we know it ;)

>>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>>
>> Queensway.
>
>Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)
>

Is there an innuendo in there? Are we now playing "Round the Horn"?

>Manor House.

Seven Sisters ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:02:42 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>> Twice.
>>
>>Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)
>>
>>BUZZ!
>>
> BUZZ!
> 
> Deviation from the game as we know it ;)

BUZZ!  Excessive buzzing!

>>>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>>>
>>> Queensway.
>>
>>Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)
>>
> Is there an innuendo in there? Are we now playing "Round the Horn"?

If the shoe fits.....<g>

>>Manor House.
> 
> Seven Sisters ;)

Highgate.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 11 Mar 2009 12:28:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:02:42 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> Twice.
>>>
>>>Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)
>>>
>>>BUZZ!
>>>
>> BUZZ!
>> 
>> Deviation from the game as we know it ;)
>
>BUZZ!  Excessive buzzing!
>

You are buzzing yourself?

LOL

>>>>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>>>>
>>>> Queensway.
>>>
>>>Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)
>>>
>> Is there an innuendo in there? Are we now playing "Round the Horn"?
>
>If the shoe fits.....<g>
>

Walk a mile in it <g>

>>>Manor House.
>> 
>> Seven Sisters ;)
>
>Highgate.
>

Kilburn, to be sure, to be sure. :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:51:48 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 11 Mar 2009 12:28:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:02:42 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> Twice.
>>>>
>>>>Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>BUZZ!
>>>>
>>> BUZZ!
>>> 
>>> Deviation from the game as we know it ;)
>>
>>BUZZ!  Excessive buzzing!
>>
> You are buzzing yourself?

Oh, no, that one's for you. ;-)

> LOL

<g>

>>>>>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Queensway.
>>>>
>>>>Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)
>>>>
>>> Is there an innuendo in there? Are we now playing "Round the Horn"?
>>
>>If the shoe fits.....<g>
>>
> Walk a mile in it <g>

Probably have done, where are my soles?

>>>>Manor House.
>>> 
>>> Seven Sisters ;)
>>
>>Highgate.
>>
> Kilburn, to be sure, to be sure. :)

Hmmm.....

Are you certain?

I'll assume you are.

Blackfriars.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 11 Mar 2009 13:11:59 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:51:48 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 11 Mar 2009 12:28:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:02:42 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Twice.
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>BUZZ!
>>>>>
>>>> BUZZ!
>>>> 
>>>> Deviation from the game as we know it ;)
>>>
>>>BUZZ!  Excessive buzzing!
>>>
>> You are buzzing yourself?
>
>Oh, no, that one's for you. ;-)
>

Well here's one for you.

BUZZ! 

>>>>>>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Queensway.
>>>>>
>>>>>Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> Is there an innuendo in there? Are we now playing "Round the Horn"?
>>>
>>>If the shoe fits.....<g>
>>>
>> Walk a mile in it <g>
>
>Probably have done, where are my soles?

Ah yes, you are an American who can walk ;)

>
>>>>>Manor House.
>>>> 
>>>> Seven Sisters ;)
>>>
>>>Highgate.
>>>
>> Kilburn, to be sure, to be sure. :)
>
>Hmmm.....
>
>Are you certain?
>
>I'll assume you are.
>
>Blackfriars.
>

I'm not hanging around a closed station so it's oft to the Oval.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:53:18 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>> You are buzzing yourself?
>>
>>Oh, no, that one's for you. ;-)
>>
>>
> Well here's one for you.
> 
> BUZZ!

Ah, about time.  :-)

>>Probably have done, where are my soles?
> 
> Ah yes, you are an American who can walk ;)

And often does. :-)

>>>>Highgate.
>>>>
>>> Kilburn, to be sure, to be sure. :)
>>
>>Hmmm.....
>>
>>Are you certain?
>>
>>I'll assume you are.
>>
>>Blackfriars.
>>
> I'm not hanging around a closed station so it's oft to the Oval.

Now you're getting serious.

Goldhawk Road

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 11 Mar 2009 16:03:01 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>Now you're getting serious.
>

I always have been but since we're in the endgame. look out.

>Goldhawk Road

Hammersmith.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:55:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 11 Mar 2009 16:03:01 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>Now you're getting serious.
>>
>>
> I always have been but since we're in the endgame. look out.

When did we move to the endgame?  This is still the opening from what I 
can tell. :-)

>>Goldhawk Road
> 
> Hammersmith.

Finchley Road.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 11 Mar 2009 17:47:12 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:55:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 11 Mar 2009 16:03:01 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>Now you're getting serious.
>>>
>>>
>> I always have been but since we're in the endgame. look out.
>
>When did we move to the endgame?  This is still the opening from what I 
>can tell. :-)
>

On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 I declared it to Bill Pragnell (about post 400). So beware!

>>>Goldhawk Road
>> 
>> Hammersmith.
>
>Finchley Road.
>

Park Lane (not passing GO)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:15:48 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 11 Mar 2009 17:47:12 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:55:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 11 Mar 2009 16:03:01 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Now you're getting serious.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I always have been but since we're in the endgame. look out.
>>
>>When did we move to the endgame?  This is still the opening from what I
>>can tell. :-)
>>
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 I declared it to Bill Pragnell (about post 400). So
> beware!

I don't know that the declaration is sufficient in this case - we'd need 
that to be adjudicated, I think.

>>>>Goldhawk Road
>>> 
>>> Hammersmith.
>>
>>Finchley Road.
>>
> Park Lane (not passing GO)

Oh, go on, do pass GO.  :-)

Well, you'll have to now...St. Albans. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 11 Mar 2009 18:28:28 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>I don't know that the declaration is sufficient in this case - we'd need 
>that to be adjudicated, I think.
>

Drop me a mail ;)

>>>>>Goldhawk Road
>>>> 
>>>> Hammersmith.
>>>
>>>Finchley Road.
>>>
>> Park Lane (not passing GO)
>
>Oh, go on, do pass GO.  :-)
>
>Well, you'll have to now...St. Albans. ;-)

Well I will then collect my 200 monetary units.

Cockfosters
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:57:59 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 11 Mar 2009 18:28:28 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>I don't know that the declaration is sufficient in this case - we'd need
>>that to be adjudicated, I think.
>>
>>
> Drop me a mail ;)

Are you tempting me? ;-)

>>>>>>Goldhawk Road
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hammersmith.
>>>>
>>>>Finchley Road.
>>>>
>>> Park Lane (not passing GO)
>>
>>Oh, go on, do pass GO.  :-)
>>
>>Well, you'll have to now...St. Albans. ;-)
> 
> Well I will then collect my 200 monetary units.

I'm glad the bank had to pay that rather than me. :-)

> Cockfosters

Oakleigh Park

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 12 Mar 2009 14:37:29 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>Oakleigh Park

Dollis Hill
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:36:33 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 12 Mar 2009 14:37:29 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>Oakleigh Park
> 
> Dollis Hill

Egads.

(No, that's not my move)

Hendon Central

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 12 Mar 2009 16:02:54 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:36:33 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 12 Mar 2009 14:37:29 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>Oakleigh Park
>> 
>> Dollis Hill
>
>Egads.
>
>(No, that's not my move)
>
>Hendon Central
>

Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:19:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>> Dollis Hill
>>
>>Egads.
>>
>>(No, that's not my move)
>>
>>Hendon Central
>>
> Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.

Brave man.

Gloucester Road

Post a reply to this message

On 12 Mar 2009 18:51:39 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:19:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> Dollis Hill
>>>
>>>Egads.
>>>
>>>(No, that's not my move)
>>>
>>>Hendon Central
>>>
>> Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.
>
>Brave man.
>

Indeed :)

>Gloucester Road

Clink St.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:37:23 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 12 Mar 2009 18:51:39 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:19:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> Dollis Hill
>>>>
>>>>Egads.
>>>>
>>>>(No, that's not my move)
>>>>
>>>>Hendon Central
>>>>
>>> Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.
>>
>>Brave man.
>>
>>
> Indeed :)
> 
>>Gloucester Road
> 
> Clink St.

Grenwich.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 13 Mar 2009 11:58:19 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:37:23 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 12 Mar 2009 18:51:39 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:19:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Dollis Hill
>>>>>
>>>>>Egads.
>>>>>
>>>>>(No, that's not my move)
>>>>>
>>>>>Hendon Central
>>>>>
>>>> Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.
>>>
>>>Brave man.
>>>
>>>
>> Indeed :)
>> 
>>>Gloucester Road
>> 
>> Clink St.
>
>Grenwich.
>
Euston Square
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:46:14 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 13 Mar 2009 11:58:19 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:37:23 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 12 Mar 2009 18:51:39 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:19:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Dollis Hill
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Egads.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>(No, that's not my move)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hendon Central
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.
>>>>
>>>>Brave man.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Indeed :)
>>> 
>>>>Gloucester Road
>>> 
>>> Clink St.
>>
>>Grenwich.
>>
> Euston Square

Mornington Crescent!

I can't believe you did that.  Euston *always* leads to MC!

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 13 Mar 2009 13:50:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>>>>>Gloucester Road
>>>> 
>>>> Clink St.
>>>
>>>Grenwich.
>>>
>> Euston Square
>
>Mornington Crescent!
>
>I can't believe you did that.  Euston *always* leads to MC!
>
>Jim

So, while Samantha nips out to enjoy a portion of winkles in cider and as the
squirrel of time nibbles on the nuts of eternity, while the irritated bulldog of
destiny tries to shake him off...

It's Wabbit season!
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:56:28 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> So, while Samantha nips out to enjoy a portion of winkles in cider and
> as the squirrel of time nibbles on the nuts of eternity, while the
> irritated bulldog of destiny tries to shake him off...
> 
> It's Wabbit season!

Duck season! :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 13 Mar 2009 15:59:38 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:56:28 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> So, while Samantha nips out to enjoy a portion of winkles in cider and
>> as the squirrel of time nibbles on the nuts of eternity, while the
>> irritated bulldog of destiny tries to shake him off...
>> 
>> It's Wabbit season!
>
>Duck season! :-)
>
>Jim

Wabbit season Jim but not as we know it.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:01:24 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>Duck season!
>>
>>Jim
> 
> Wabbit season Jim but not as we know it.

It's the end of the world as we know it......

Duck season!

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 13 Mar 2009 16:03:44 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:01:24 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>Duck season!
>>>
>>>Jim
>> 
>> Wabbit season Jim but not as we know it.
>
>It's the end of the world as we know it......
>
>Duck season!
>

Wa Wa Wa Wabbits!
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:16:23 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 13 Mar 2009 16:03:44 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:01:24 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>Duck season!
>>>>
>>>>Jim
>>> 
>>> Wabbit season Jim but not as we know it.
>>
>>It's the end of the world as we know it......
>>
>>Duck season!
>>
>>
> Wa Wa Wa Wabbits!

Du du du du DUCKS! :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 13 Mar 2009 18:20:31 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>>>> Wabbit season Jim but not as we know it.
>>>
>>>It's the end of the world as we know it......
>>>
>>>Duck season!
>>>
>>>
>> Wa Wa Wa Wabbits!
>
>Du du du du DUCKS! :-)

You win, it's Duck season. What would I know about it anyway? 
I think killing things for fun is immoral even if they are only 2D :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:08:05 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 13 Mar 2009 18:20:31 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>>>> Wabbit season Jim but not as we know it.
>>>>
>>>>It's the end of the world as we know it......
>>>>
>>>>Duck season!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Wa Wa Wa Wabbits!
>>
>>Du du du du DUCKS! :-)
> 
> You win, it's Duck season. What would I know about it anyway? I think
> killing things for fun is immoral even if they are only 2D :)

But it's Wabbit season! :-)

(And I don't disagree with you on your final comment)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 15 Mar 2009 13:15:22 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:08:05 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 13 Mar 2009 18:20:31 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> Wabbit season Jim but not as we know it.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's the end of the world as we know it......
>>>>>
>>>>>Duck season!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Wa Wa Wa Wabbits!
>>>
>>>Du du du du DUCKS! :-)
>> 
>> You win, it's Duck season. What would I know about it anyway? I think
>> killing things for fun is immoral even if they are only 2D :)
>
>But it's Wabbit season! :-)
>

Ah! you were just bending your knees sharply :)

>(And I don't disagree with you on your final comment)
>

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jzy5

Just for you :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:28:18 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 15 Mar 2009 13:15:22 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:08:05 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 13 Mar 2009 18:20:31 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>>>> Wabbit season Jim but not as we know it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's the end of the world as we know it......
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Duck season!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Wa Wa Wa Wabbits!
>>>>
>>>>Du du du du DUCKS! :-)
>>> 
>>> You win, it's Duck season. What would I know about it anyway? I think
>>> killing things for fun is immoral even if they are only 2D :)
>>
>>But it's Wabbit season! :-)
>>
>>
> Ah! you were just bending your knees sharply :)

Well, I do occasionally have muscle spasms that cause that - seems that 
my muscles have gotten used to exercise, and when I don't, they remind me.

>>(And I don't disagree with you on your final comment)
>>
>>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jzy5
> 
> Just for you :)

And every other reader of that page. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 15 Mar 2009 16:25:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jzy5
>> 
>> Just for you :)
>
>And every other reader of that page. :-)

Note the date. I'm lost for words. :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:17:39 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 15 Mar 2009 16:25:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jzy5
>>> 
>>> Just for you :)
>>
>>And every other reader of that page. :-)
> 
> Note the date. I'm lost for words. :)

Lost for words?  :-)

Did note the date - are they doing new ones?

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 16 Mar 2009 17:26:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:17:39 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 15 Mar 2009 16:25:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jzy5
>>>> 
>>>> Just for you :)
>>>
>>>And every other reader of that page. :-)
>> 
>> Note the date. I'm lost for words. :)
>
>Lost for words?  :-)
>
>Did note the date - are they doing new ones?
>

No, no, no. Note today's date because I'm lost for words and it doesn't happen
very often.

I don't know, they did series in 2002, 2006 and 2007.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamish_and_Dougal

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:24:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 16 Mar 2009 17:26:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:17:39 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 Mar 2009 16:25:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jzy5
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just for you :)
>>>>
>>>>And every other reader of that page. :-)
>>> 
>>> Note the date. I'm lost for words. :)
>>
>>Lost for words?  :-)
>>
>>Did note the date - are they doing new ones?
>>
>>
> No, no, no. Note today's date because I'm lost for words and it doesn't
> happen very often.

Ah, well, that at least in my experience is certainly true.


> I don't know, they did series in 2002, 2006 and 2007.
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamish_and_Dougal

Yeah, that's what I knew about.  But I haven't heard any of those series 
either so even if it was a repeat, it's still new to us. :-)

Marble Arch.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 16 Mar 2009 18:37:34 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>Yeah, that's what I knew about.  But I haven't heard any of those series 
>either so even if it was a repeat, it's still new to us. :-)
>

I've only heard a couple, myself

>Marble Arch.

Oh! No you don't!
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:00:03 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 16 Mar 2009 18:37:34 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>Yeah, that's what I knew about.  But I haven't heard any of those series
>>either so even if it was a repeat, it's still new to us. :-)
>>
>>
> I've only heard a couple, myself

Time to start searching, methinks. :-)

>>Marble Arch.
> 
> Oh! No you don't!

I think rule 47(a) says that the winner is permitted to start the next 
round - and I'm already in hoc to you for a bought round, so I figured 
let's give it another go and see if I can earn that bought round back. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 16 Mar 2009 22:11:11 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:00:03 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 16 Mar 2009 18:37:34 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>Yeah, that's what I knew about.  But I haven't heard any of those series
>>>either so even if it was a repeat, it's still new to us. :-)
>>>
>>>
>> I've only heard a couple, myself
>
>Time to start searching, methinks. :-)
>
A starting point, maybe

http://tinyurl.com/d75bx6

>>>Marble Arch.
>> 
>> Oh! No you don't!
>
>I think rule 47(a) says that the winner is permitted to start the next 
>round - and I'm already in hoc to you for a bought round, so I figured 
>let's give it another go and see if I can earn that bought round back. :-)
>
I think that the teams are too small and we need an adjudicator.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:49:09 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>Time to start searching, methinks. :-)
>>
> A starting point, maybe
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/d75bx6

:-)

>>>>Marble Arch.
>>> 
>>> Oh! No you don't!
>>
>>I think rule 47(a) says that the winner is permitted to start the next
>>round - and I'm already in hoc to you for a bought round, so I figured
>>let's give it another go and see if I can earn that bought round back.
>>:-)
>>
> I think that the teams are too small and we need an adjudicator.

Well, the teams aren't too small, because we had 2+ months of a game with 
teams the way we are now....But I'll call in an adjudicator, one 
moment. :-)

OK, adjudication is in......

I am permitted to start this round, but my next move has to be to 
Bayswater.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 17 Mar 2009 15:42:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>Well, the teams aren't too small, because we had 2+ months of a game with 
>teams the way we are now....But I'll call in an adjudicator, one 
>moment. :-)
>
>OK, adjudication is in......
>
>I am permitted to start this round, but my next move has to be to 
>Bayswater.

You can't fool me, your lips moved. We need an independent adjudicator.

If you are at Bayswater then I will meet you in the Redan at the top of
Queensway.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message