 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:34:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2009 14:27:08 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>>>>> Russell Square.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Interesting move.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Fulham Broadway.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wimbledon
>>>>
>>>>Great Portland Street.
>>>>
>>> Regents Park, sidestepping the parallel junction rule. :)
>>
>>Nice move there.....
>>
>>Russell Square.
>>
> You can't return to Russell Square when it is still in the list. You
> miss a turn.
You forgot the exception for the first of the month, but your move is
valid either way.....
> Shooters hill
Mansion House.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 2 Mar 2009 12:29:46 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:34:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 1 Mar 2009 14:27:08 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>> Russell Square.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Interesting move.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Fulham Broadway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wimbledon
>>>>>
>>>>>Great Portland Street.
>>>>>
>>>> Regents Park, sidestepping the parallel junction rule. :)
>>>
>>>Nice move there.....
>>>
>>>Russell Square.
>>>
>> You can't return to Russell Square when it is still in the list. You
>> miss a turn.
>
>You forgot the exception for the first of the month, but your move is
>valid either way.....
>
>> Shooters hill
>
>Mansion House.
>
Algate East
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:45:58 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>> Shooters hill
>>
>>Mansion House.
>>
> Algate East
Farringdon, then.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 3 Mar 2009 11:32:24 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:45:58 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> Shooters hill
>>>
>>>Mansion House.
>>>
>> Algate East
>
>Farringdon, then.
>
Hong Kong
No, I was joshing.
Chancery Lane.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:57:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 3 Mar 2009 11:32:24 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:45:58 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> Shooters hill
>>>>
>>>>Mansion House.
>>>>
>>> Algate East
>>
>>Farringdon, then.
>>
> Hong Kong
Tainan.
> No, I was joshing.
So was I. ;-)
> Chancery Lane.
St. Paul's.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 3 Mar 2009 14:51:37 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:57:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 3 Mar 2009 11:32:24 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:45:58 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Shooters hill
>>>>>
>>>>>Mansion House.
>>>>>
>>>> Algate East
>>>
>>>Farringdon, then.
>>>
>> Hong Kong
>
>Tainan.
>
>> No, I was joshing.
>
>So was I. ;-)
>
>> Chancery Lane.
>
>St. Paul's.
>
Again!
Tower Bridge.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:35:51 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>> Chancery Lane.
>>
>>St. Paul's.
>>
> Again!
Yes, again. :-) Farnsworth's third variation.
> Tower Bridge.
Edgware Road.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 3 Mar 2009 18:50:25 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:35:51 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> Chancery Lane.
>>>
>>>St. Paul's.
>>>
>> Again!
>
>Yes, again. :-) Farnsworth's third variation.
>
>> Tower Bridge.
>
>Edgware Road.
>
Using the parallel lines conundrum I move to Gloucester Road.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:13:49 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>St. Paul's.
>>>>
>>> Again!
>>
>>Yes, again. :-) Farnsworth's third variation.
>>
>>> Tower Bridge.
>>
>>Edgware Road.
>>
> Using the parallel lines conundrum I move to Gloucester Road.
Then I think it's time to take a moped around Hyde Park Corner.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 4 Mar 2009 13:15:07 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:13:49 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>>>St. Paul's.
>>>>>
>>>> Again!
>>>
>>>Yes, again. :-) Farnsworth's third variation.
>>>
>>>> Tower Bridge.
>>>
>>>Edgware Road.
>>>
>> Using the parallel lines conundrum I move to Gloucester Road.
>
>Then I think it's time to take a moped around Hyde Park Corner.
>
Are you out of your mind? A moped!
Charring Cross Road.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:08:25 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 4 Mar 2009 13:15:07 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:13:49 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>>>St. Paul's.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Again!
>>>>
>>>>Yes, again. :-) Farnsworth's third variation.
>>>>
>>>>> Tower Bridge.
>>>>
>>>>Edgware Road.
>>>>
>>> Using the parallel lines conundrum I move to Gloucester Road.
>>
>>Then I think it's time to take a moped around Hyde Park Corner.
>>
> Are you out of your mind? A moped!
Been listening to HHG again. Episode 3 tonight if I ever get away from
this computer.
> Charring Cross Road.
Ah, another repeat. :-)
Lancaster Gate.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 5 Mar 2009 02:26:24 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>>>>Edgware Road.
>>>>>
>>>> Using the parallel lines conundrum I move to Gloucester Road.
>>>
>>>Then I think it's time to take a moped around Hyde Park Corner.
>>>
>> Are you out of your mind? A moped!
>
>Been listening to HHG again. Episode 3 tonight if I ever get away from
>this computer.
>
No, I've only read the books.
>> Charring Cross Road.
>
>Ah, another repeat. :-)
>
>Lancaster Gate.
>
Camden Town.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:44:16 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 5 Mar 2009 02:26:24 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>Edgware Road.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Using the parallel lines conundrum I move to Gloucester Road.
>>>>
>>>>Then I think it's time to take a moped around Hyde Park Corner.
>>>>
>>> Are you out of your mind? A moped!
>>
>>Been listening to HHG again. Episode 3 tonight if I ever get away from
>>this computer.
>>
>>
> No, I've only read the books.
Then you've missed out. The radio series is outstanding. :-)
>>> Charring Cross Road.
>>
>>Ah, another repeat. :-)
>>
>>Lancaster Gate.
>>
> Camden Town.
And another repeat. :-)
So since we're into repeats now, Edgware Road.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 5 Mar 2009 13:48:28 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>>Been listening to HHG again. Episode 3 tonight if I ever get away from
>>>this computer.
>>>
>>>
>> No, I've only read the books.
>
>Then you've missed out. The radio series is outstanding. :-)
>
I'm never able to remember to listen or watch series. Seldom in the same place
at the same time.
>>>> Charring Cross Road.
>>>
>>>Ah, another repeat. :-)
>>>
>>>Lancaster Gate.
>>>
>> Camden Town.
>
>And another repeat. :-)
>
>So since we're into repeats now, Edgware Road.
>
Sounds like BBC Radio 7 ;-)
Watford Junction (The end of the known universe :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:08:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>Then you've missed out. The radio series is outstanding. :-)
>>
> I'm never able to remember to listen or watch series. Seldom in the same
> place at the same time.
That's why I have mp3s. :-)
>>> Camden Town.
>>
>>And another repeat. :-)
>>
>>So since we're into repeats now, Edgware Road.
>>
> Sounds like BBC Radio 7 ;-)
Ah, yes. :-)
> Watford Junction (The end of the known universe :)
The view is nice from here. :-)
How about Tower Hill this time.....
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 6 Mar 2009 16:49:40 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:08:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>Then you've missed out. The radio series is outstanding. :-)
>>>
>> I'm never able to remember to listen or watch series. Seldom in the same
>> place at the same time.
>
>That's why I have mp3s. :-)
>
Woosh!
>>>> Camden Town.
>>>
>>>And another repeat. :-)
>>>
>>>So since we're into repeats now, Edgware Road.
>>>
>> Sounds like BBC Radio 7 ;-)
>
>Ah, yes. :-)
>
>> Watford Junction (The end of the known universe :)
>
>The view is nice from here. :-)
>
>How about Tower Hill this time.....
>
It is almost the end of the line so...
Upminster.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:13:04 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2009 16:49:40 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:08:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>Then you've missed out. The radio series is outstanding. :-)
>>>>
>>> I'm never able to remember to listen or watch series. Seldom in the
>>> same place at the same time.
>>
>>That's why I have mp3s. :-)
>>
> Woosh!
You know, mp3s, audio files so you don't have to catch it on the
radio. ;-)
>>>>> Camden Town.
>>>>
>>>>And another repeat. :-)
>>>>
>>>>So since we're into repeats now, Edgware Road.
>>>>
>>> Sounds like BBC Radio 7 ;-)
>>
>>Ah, yes. :-)
>>
>>> Watford Junction (The end of the known universe :)
>>
>>The view is nice from here. :-)
>>
>>How about Tower Hill this time.....
>>
> It is almost the end of the line so...
>
> Upminster.
I couldn've sworn that rule 37b said....oh, never mind. ;-)
Harlesden
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 7 Mar 2009 13:33:29 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:13:04 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 6 Mar 2009 16:49:40 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:08:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Then you've missed out. The radio series is outstanding. :-)
>>>>>
>>>> I'm never able to remember to listen or watch series. Seldom in the
>>>> same place at the same time.
>>>
>>>That's why I have mp3s. :-)
>>>
>> Woosh!
>
>You know, mp3s, audio files so you don't have to catch it on the
>radio. ;-)
>
Then why do you have to wait till you're off the computer?
Newfangled poopah!
>>>>>> Camden Town.
>>>>>
>>>>>And another repeat. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>So since we're into repeats now, Edgware Road.
>>>>>
>>>> Sounds like BBC Radio 7 ;-)
>>>
>>>Ah, yes. :-)
>>>
>>>> Watford Junction (The end of the known universe :)
>>>
>>>The view is nice from here. :-)
>>>
>>>How about Tower Hill this time.....
>>>
>> It is almost the end of the line so...
>>
>> Upminster.
>
>I couldn've sworn that rule 37b said....oh, never mind. ;-)
>
>Harlesden
>
But rule 37c says you can :)
Royal Oak, I'll nip into the library while I'm waiting.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:29:01 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>That's why I have mp3s. :-)
>>>>
>>> Woosh!
>>
>>You know, mp3s, audio files so you don't have to catch it on the radio.
>>;-)
>>
> Then why do you have to wait till you're off the computer?
I don't - I can multitask. ;-)
> Newfangled poopah!
LOL.
>>> Upminster.
>>
>>I couldn've sworn that rule 37b said....oh, never mind. ;-)
>>
>>Harlesden
>>
> But rule 37c says you can :)
Yeah, that's why I stopped. :-)
> Royal Oak, I'll nip into the library while I'm waiting.
Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 8 Mar 2009 16:03:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:29:01 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>>>That's why I have mp3s. :-)
>>>>>
>>>> Woosh!
>>>
>>>You know, mp3s, audio files so you don't have to catch it on the radio.
>>>;-)
>>>
>> Then why do you have to wait till you're off the computer?
>
>I don't - I can multitask. ;-)
>
But real men can't do that ;)
>> Newfangled poopah!
>
>LOL.
>
>>>> Upminster.
>>>
>>>I couldn've sworn that rule 37b said....oh, never mind. ;-)
>>>
>>>Harlesden
>>>
>> But rule 37c says you can :)
>
>Yeah, that's why I stopped. :-)
>
>> Royal Oak, I'll nip into the library while I'm waiting.
>
>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.
>
Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:40:32 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>You know, mp3s, audio files so you don't have to catch it on the
>>>>radio. ;-)
>>>>
>>> Then why do you have to wait till you're off the computer?
>>
>>I don't - I can multitask. ;-)
>>
> But real men can't do that ;)
What? Sorry, I was working on something else. Oh, I see what you
mean. ;-)
>>> Newfangled poopah!
>>
>>LOL.
>>
>>>>> Upminster.
>>>>
>>>>I couldn've sworn that rule 37b said....oh, never mind. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>Harlesden
>>>>
>>> But rule 37c says you can :)
>>
>>Yeah, that's why I stopped. :-)
>>
>>> Royal Oak, I'll nip into the library while I'm waiting.
>>
>>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.
>>
> Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"
What, Golder's Green?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 8 Mar 2009 23:55:41 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>What? Sorry, I was working on something else. Oh, I see what you
>mean. ;-)
LOL
>
>>>> Newfangled poopah!
>>>
>>>LOL.
>>>
>>>>>> Upminster.
>>>>>
>>>>>I couldn've sworn that rule 37b said....oh, never mind. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>Harlesden
>>>>>
>>>> But rule 37c says you can :)
>>>
>>>Yeah, that's why I stopped. :-)
>>>
>>>> Royal Oak, I'll nip into the library while I'm waiting.
>>>
>>>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.
>>>
>> Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"
>
>What, Golder's Green?
>
Was that a question or a move?
If it was a move then mine is "Archway" if not
BUZZ! :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:39:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.
>>>>
>>> Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"
>>
>>What, Golder's Green?
>>
> Was that a question or a move?
>
> If it was a move then mine is "Archway" if not
>
> BUZZ! :)
Obviously it was a move, otherwise I got "Buzzed" and missed a turn. The
other way around, you missed a turn. :-)
Paddington.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 9 Mar 2009 15:02:20 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:39:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>>>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see there.
>>>>>
>>>> Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"
>>>
>>>What, Golder's Green?
>>>
>> Was that a question or a move?
>>
>> If it was a move then mine is "Archway" if not
>>
>> BUZZ! :)
>
>Obviously it was a move, otherwise I got "Buzzed" and missed a turn. The
>other way around, you missed a turn. :-)
>
>Paddington.
>
And?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:09:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 9 Mar 2009 15:02:20 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:39:20 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>>>Fairlop Station, though it looks like there's not a lot to see
>>>>>>there.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Not a regular stop for me so find "Bull & Bush"
>>>>
>>>>What, Golder's Green?
>>>>
>>> Was that a question or a move?
>>>
>>> If it was a move then mine is "Archway" if not
>>>
>>> BUZZ! :)
>>
>>Obviously it was a move, otherwise I got "Buzzed" and missed a turn.
>>The other way around, you missed a turn. :-)
>>
>>Paddington.
>>
>>
> And?
And that was my move. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 9 Mar 2009 18:46:49 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>>Paddington.
>>>
>>>
>> And?
>
>And that was my move. ;-)
Arggg! I'm loosing it.
(I was there earlier today)
Bayswater.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:06:14 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 9 Mar 2009 18:46:49 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>>>Paddington.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> And?
>>
>>And that was my move. ;-)
>
> Arggg! I'm loosing it.
>
> (I was there earlier today)
I guess I have to buzz you then for hesitation. ;-)
BUZZ!
> Bayswater.
Notting Hill Gate.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 9 Mar 2009 19:12:19 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:06:14 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 9 Mar 2009 18:46:49 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>Paddington.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> And?
>>>
>>>And that was my move. ;-)
>>
>> Arggg! I'm loosing it.
>>
>> (I was there earlier today)
>
>I guess I have to buzz you then for hesitation. ;-)
>
Twice.
>BUZZ!
>
>> Bayswater.
>
>Notting Hill Gate.
>
Queensway.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:39:38 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>> Arggg! I'm loosing it.
>>>
>>> (I was there earlier today)
>>
>>I guess I have to buzz you then for hesitation. ;-)
>>
>>
> Twice.
Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)
BUZZ!
>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>
> Queensway.
Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)
Manor House.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 10 Mar 2009 13:11:06 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:39:38 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> Arggg! I'm loosing it.
>>>>
>>>> (I was there earlier today)
>>>
>>>I guess I have to buzz you then for hesitation. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> Twice.
>
>Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)
>
>BUZZ!
>
BUZZ!
Deviation from the game as we know it ;)
>>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>>
>> Queensway.
>
>Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)
>
Is there an innuendo in there? Are we now playing "Round the Horn"?
>Manor House.
Seven Sisters ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:02:42 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>> Twice.
>>
>>Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)
>>
>>BUZZ!
>>
> BUZZ!
>
> Deviation from the game as we know it ;)
BUZZ! Excessive buzzing!
>>>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>>>
>>> Queensway.
>>
>>Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)
>>
> Is there an innuendo in there? Are we now playing "Round the Horn"?
If the shoe fits.....<g>
>>Manor House.
>
> Seven Sisters ;)
Highgate.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 11 Mar 2009 12:28:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:02:42 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> Twice.
>>>
>>>Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)
>>>
>>>BUZZ!
>>>
>> BUZZ!
>>
>> Deviation from the game as we know it ;)
>
>BUZZ! Excessive buzzing!
>
You are buzzing yourself?
LOL
>>>>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>>>>
>>>> Queensway.
>>>
>>>Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)
>>>
>> Is there an innuendo in there? Are we now playing "Round the Horn"?
>
>If the shoe fits.....<g>
>
Walk a mile in it <g>
>>>Manor House.
>>
>> Seven Sisters ;)
>
>Highgate.
>
Kilburn, to be sure, to be sure. :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:51:48 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2009 12:28:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:02:42 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> Twice.
>>>>
>>>>Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>BUZZ!
>>>>
>>> BUZZ!
>>>
>>> Deviation from the game as we know it ;)
>>
>>BUZZ! Excessive buzzing!
>>
> You are buzzing yourself?
Oh, no, that one's for you. ;-)
> LOL
<g>
>>>>>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Queensway.
>>>>
>>>>Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)
>>>>
>>> Is there an innuendo in there? Are we now playing "Round the Horn"?
>>
>>If the shoe fits.....<g>
>>
> Walk a mile in it <g>
Probably have done, where are my soles?
>>>>Manor House.
>>>
>>> Seven Sisters ;)
>>
>>Highgate.
>>
> Kilburn, to be sure, to be sure. :)
Hmmm.....
Are you certain?
I'll assume you are.
Blackfriars.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 11 Mar 2009 13:11:59 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:51:48 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 11 Mar 2009 12:28:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:02:42 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Twice.
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, OK, if you insist. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>BUZZ!
>>>>>
>>>> BUZZ!
>>>>
>>>> Deviation from the game as we know it ;)
>>>
>>>BUZZ! Excessive buzzing!
>>>
>> You are buzzing yourself?
>
>Oh, no, that one's for you. ;-)
>
Well here's one for you.
BUZZ!
>>>>>>>Notting Hill Gate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Queensway.
>>>>>
>>>>>Now you're getting out of hand.... ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> Is there an innuendo in there? Are we now playing "Round the Horn"?
>>>
>>>If the shoe fits.....<g>
>>>
>> Walk a mile in it <g>
>
>Probably have done, where are my soles?
Ah yes, you are an American who can walk ;)
>
>>>>>Manor House.
>>>>
>>>> Seven Sisters ;)
>>>
>>>Highgate.
>>>
>> Kilburn, to be sure, to be sure. :)
>
>Hmmm.....
>
>Are you certain?
>
>I'll assume you are.
>
>Blackfriars.
>
I'm not hanging around a closed station so it's oft to the Oval.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:53:18 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>> You are buzzing yourself?
>>
>>Oh, no, that one's for you. ;-)
>>
>>
> Well here's one for you.
>
> BUZZ!
Ah, about time. :-)
>>Probably have done, where are my soles?
>
> Ah yes, you are an American who can walk ;)
And often does. :-)
>>>>Highgate.
>>>>
>>> Kilburn, to be sure, to be sure. :)
>>
>>Hmmm.....
>>
>>Are you certain?
>>
>>I'll assume you are.
>>
>>Blackfriars.
>>
> I'm not hanging around a closed station so it's oft to the Oval.
Now you're getting serious.
Goldhawk Road
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 11 Mar 2009 16:03:01 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>Now you're getting serious.
>
I always have been but since we're in the endgame. look out.
>Goldhawk Road
Hammersmith.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:55:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2009 16:03:01 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>Now you're getting serious.
>>
>>
> I always have been but since we're in the endgame. look out.
When did we move to the endgame? This is still the opening from what I
can tell. :-)
>>Goldhawk Road
>
> Hammersmith.
Finchley Road.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 11 Mar 2009 17:47:12 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:55:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 11 Mar 2009 16:03:01 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>>Now you're getting serious.
>>>
>>>
>> I always have been but since we're in the endgame. look out.
>
>When did we move to the endgame? This is still the opening from what I
>can tell. :-)
>
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 I declared it to Bill Pragnell (about post 400). So beware!
>>>Goldhawk Road
>>
>> Hammersmith.
>
>Finchley Road.
>
Park Lane (not passing GO)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:15:48 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2009 17:47:12 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:55:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 11 Mar 2009 16:03:01 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Now you're getting serious.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I always have been but since we're in the endgame. look out.
>>
>>When did we move to the endgame? This is still the opening from what I
>>can tell. :-)
>>
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 I declared it to Bill Pragnell (about post 400). So
> beware!
I don't know that the declaration is sufficient in this case - we'd need
that to be adjudicated, I think.
>>>>Goldhawk Road
>>>
>>> Hammersmith.
>>
>>Finchley Road.
>>
> Park Lane (not passing GO)
Oh, go on, do pass GO. :-)
Well, you'll have to now...St. Albans. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 11 Mar 2009 18:28:28 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>I don't know that the declaration is sufficient in this case - we'd need
>that to be adjudicated, I think.
>
Drop me a mail ;)
>>>>>Goldhawk Road
>>>>
>>>> Hammersmith.
>>>
>>>Finchley Road.
>>>
>> Park Lane (not passing GO)
>
>Oh, go on, do pass GO. :-)
>
>Well, you'll have to now...St. Albans. ;-)
Well I will then collect my 200 monetary units.
Cockfosters
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:57:59 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2009 18:28:28 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>
>>I don't know that the declaration is sufficient in this case - we'd need
>>that to be adjudicated, I think.
>>
>>
> Drop me a mail ;)
Are you tempting me? ;-)
>>>>>>Goldhawk Road
>>>>>
>>>>> Hammersmith.
>>>>
>>>>Finchley Road.
>>>>
>>> Park Lane (not passing GO)
>>
>>Oh, go on, do pass GO. :-)
>>
>>Well, you'll have to now...St. Albans. ;-)
>
> Well I will then collect my 200 monetary units.
I'm glad the bank had to pay that rather than me. :-)
> Cockfosters
Oakleigh Park
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 12 Mar 2009 14:37:29 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>Oakleigh Park
Dollis Hill
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:36:33 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2009 14:37:29 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>Oakleigh Park
>
> Dollis Hill
Egads.
(No, that's not my move)
Hendon Central
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 12 Mar 2009 16:02:54 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:36:33 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 12 Mar 2009 14:37:29 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>>Oakleigh Park
>>
>> Dollis Hill
>
>Egads.
>
>(No, that's not my move)
>
>Hendon Central
>
Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:19:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>> Dollis Hill
>>
>>Egads.
>>
>>(No, that's not my move)
>>
>>Hendon Central
>>
> Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.
Brave man.
Gloucester Road
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 12 Mar 2009 18:51:39 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:19:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> Dollis Hill
>>>
>>>Egads.
>>>
>>>(No, that's not my move)
>>>
>>>Hendon Central
>>>
>> Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.
>
>Brave man.
>
Indeed :)
>Gloucester Road
Clink St.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:37:23 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2009 18:51:39 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:19:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> Dollis Hill
>>>>
>>>>Egads.
>>>>
>>>>(No, that's not my move)
>>>>
>>>>Hendon Central
>>>>
>>> Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.
>>
>>Brave man.
>>
>>
> Indeed :)
>
>>Gloucester Road
>
> Clink St.
Grenwich.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 13 Mar 2009 11:58:19 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:37:23 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 12 Mar 2009 18:51:39 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:19:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Dollis Hill
>>>>>
>>>>>Egads.
>>>>>
>>>>>(No, that's not my move)
>>>>>
>>>>>Hendon Central
>>>>>
>>>> Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.
>>>
>>>Brave man.
>>>
>>>
>> Indeed :)
>>
>>>Gloucester Road
>>
>> Clink St.
>
>Grenwich.
>
Euston Square
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:46:14 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 13 Mar 2009 11:58:19 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:37:23 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 12 Mar 2009 18:51:39 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:19:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Dollis Hill
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Egads.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>(No, that's not my move)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hendon Central
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sloane Square in a Chelsea tractor.
>>>>
>>>>Brave man.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Indeed :)
>>>
>>>>Gloucester Road
>>>
>>> Clink St.
>>
>>Grenwich.
>>
> Euston Square
Mornington Crescent!
I can't believe you did that. Euston *always* leads to MC!
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 13 Mar 2009 13:50:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>>>>Gloucester Road
>>>>
>>>> Clink St.
>>>
>>>Grenwich.
>>>
>> Euston Square
>
>Mornington Crescent!
>
>I can't believe you did that. Euston *always* leads to MC!
>
>Jim
So, while Samantha nips out to enjoy a portion of winkles in cider and as the
squirrel of time nibbles on the nuts of eternity, while the irritated bulldog of
destiny tries to shake him off...
It's Wabbit season!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |