On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:37:28 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 22 Feb 2009 18:06:46 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>>>Heh, you should see the size of the blocks here in Salt Lake City -
>>>>much larger than in most cities, especially in the central part of the
>>>>city.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> My blocks are bigger than your blocks or even Darren's :)
>>
>>How big are your blocks? ;-)
>>
> No, I was speaking for you. :)
> Our blocks are too irregular to say. Just looking on a local map they
> range from 60 ft to 350 yards

Ah, see, you confused me. :-)

>>> Hampton Court Palace
>>
>>Really?
>>
>>Hounslow Central, then.
> 
> Yes
> 
> Brentford, then.

Putney Bridge.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 23 Feb 2009 11:04:40 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>Ah, see, you confused me. :-)
>

I'm good at that :)

>>>> Hampton Court Palace
>>>
>>>Really?
>>>
>>>Hounslow Central, then.
>> 
>> Yes
>> 
>> Brentford, then.
>
>Putney Bridge.

Oh! We can see if Tom Melly is around :)

Dulwich for the art gallery.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:23:52 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 23 Feb 2009 11:04:40 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>Ah, see, you confused me. :-)
>>
> I'm good at that :)

LOL

>>Putney Bridge.
> 
> Oh! We can see if Tom Melly is around :)
> 
> Dulwich for the art gallery.

Peckham Rye, then - I'm getting hungry again.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 23 Feb 2009 12:12:08 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> Dulwich for the art gallery.
>
>Peckham Rye, then - I'm getting hungry again.

<groan>

Brixton then, for some brown stew chicken.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:12:22 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 23 Feb 2009 12:12:08 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> Dulwich for the art gallery.
>>
>>Peckham Rye, then - I'm getting hungry again.
> 
> <groan>

You're welcome. :-)

> Brixton then, for some brown stew chicken.

Then I should do the traditional move of Albemarle Street next. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 25 Feb 2009 11:00:02 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>Then I should do the traditional move of Albemarle Street next. :-)

There is a chance of falling foul of the "no revisits on high days and holidays"
rule, this being Ash Wednesday. 
So I'll go to the site of the infamous Tyburn Tree, Marble Arch.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:23:39 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 25 Feb 2009 11:00:02 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Then I should do the traditional move of Albemarle Street next. :-)
> 
> There is a chance of falling foul of the "no revisits on high days and
> holidays" rule, this being Ash Wednesday.

You're playing it awfully carefully.....

> So I'll go to the site of the infamous Tyburn Tree, Marble Arch.

And awfully safe. :-)

I would be remiss if I didn't make a stop at Covent Garden - that is the 
first of London we saw, after all.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 25 Feb 2009 13:17:38 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:23:39 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 25 Feb 2009 11:00:02 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Then I should do the traditional move of Albemarle Street next. :-)
>> 
>> There is a chance of falling foul of the "no revisits on high days and
>> holidays" rule, this being Ash Wednesday.
>
>You're playing it awfully carefully.....
>

Am I? ;)

>> So I'll go to the site of the infamous Tyburn Tree, Marble Arch.
>
>And awfully safe. :-)

Only for some. :)

>I would be remiss if I didn't make a stop at Covent Garden - that is the 
>first of London we saw, after all.
>

Ah! Ha!

You fell foul of the "no revisits on high days and holidays" rule, yesterday
being Ash Wednesday, and all. We were there on 20 Jan 2009. You are now in spoon
and must miss your turn.

We move to the Barbican.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:01:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 25 Feb 2009 13:17:38 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:23:39 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 25 Feb 2009 11:00:02 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>Then I should do the traditional move of Albemarle Street next. :-)
>>> 
>>> There is a chance of falling foul of the "no revisits on high days and
>>> holidays" rule, this being Ash Wednesday.
>>
>>You're playing it awfully carefully.....
>>
>>
> Am I? ;)
> 
>>> So I'll go to the site of the infamous Tyburn Tree, Marble Arch.
>>
>>And awfully safe. :-)
> 
> Only for some. :)

LOL

>>I would be remiss if I didn't make a stop at Covent Garden - that is the
>>first of London we saw, after all.
>>
> Ah! Ha!
> 
> You fell foul of the "no revisits on high days and holidays" rule,
> yesterday being Ash Wednesday, and all. We were there on 20 Jan 2009.
> You are now in spoon and must miss your turn.

Damn!

> We move to the Barbican.

And NOW we can move to Covent Garden. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 26 Feb 2009 10:23:39 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:01:19 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> 
>> You fell foul of the "no revisits on high days and holidays" rule,
>> yesterday being Ash Wednesday, and all. We were there on 20 Jan 2009.
>> You are now in spoon and must miss your turn.
>
>Damn!
>
>> We move to the Barbican.
>
>And NOW we can move to Covent Garden. :-)
>

I can't stand those people who paint themselves silver and stand still for aeons
so quickly to Holborn.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message