On 19 Dec 2008 13:09:35 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:30:28 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>Which reminds me, there's a really good video exploration of extra-
>>>dimensional mathematics, can't remember if it was posted here or not.
>>>I'll have to see if I can find it again, it was fascinating stuff.
>>>
>>>
>> Please do/
>
>Found it:
>
>http://www.dimensions-math.org/
>

Two hours, it looks good and I'm downloading it. Thanks

I may have posted these links before.
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/5numbers.shtml

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/another5.shtml

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson wrote:
> I think Darren probably stopped following this thread long ago. :-)

Not so much following it as trying to skip over it. ;-)

I have no opinion on the subject at hand.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
   see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:

> I flunked Chemistry :(

Oh, shame. It was my best class. Biology on the other hand ..
-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:

> 
> What's stopping you then? ;)
> 

Not enough spare time.

>>> BTW what is the record for the longest thread of trivia?
>> One of Andy's "Wondering" series?
> 
> I'm out of here.

Awwe, I quite enjoyed his posts wondering about things. It brought out 
some very interesting discussions and topics at times.
-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:27:33 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:

>
>I have no opinion on the subject at hand.

Note the date :-)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:40:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>> BTW what is the record for the longest thread of trivia?
>>
>>3,192,793 messages.  Why do you ask? ;-)
>>
>>
> To see if it was worth carrying on :)

And your conclusion?

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:55:21 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 13:09:35 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:30:28 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>Which reminds me, there's a really good video exploration of extra-
>>>>dimensional mathematics, can't remember if it was posted here or not.
>>>>I'll have to see if I can find it again, it was fascinating stuff.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Please do/
>>
>>Found it:
>>
>>http://www.dimensions-math.org/
>>
>>
> Two hours, it looks good and I'm downloading it. Thanks

Yeah, I ended up downloading them myself, which I had forgotten.  They 
might've been on my crashed hard drive.

The problem with having large hard drives is remembering what's actually 
on them and where it is.

> I may have posted these links before.
>  
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/5numbers.shtml
> 
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/another5.shtml

Cool.... :)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:58:02 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:

> Stephen wrote:
> 
>> I flunked Chemistry :(
> 
> Oh, shame. It was my best class. Biology on the other hand ..

Heh, I didn't even take Biology in high school - I did well in chem 
there, but when it came time to play at college, I bombed miserably.  10 
credit hours (had to take it twice) and couldn't wrap my head around 
chemical balancing equations and organic chem.  The first, I think, was 
the prof's fault - stupid me, I took the class twice with him.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:35:47 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 14:29:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:34:10 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>Had to be dragged off?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Not literally but you know when he gets started, he can't stop.
>>> Outside of his act (it was a chat show) he is a nice polite man. (If a
>>> bit loud)
>>
>>It depends I think on whether he's "people watching" - from the
>>interview, he indicated that he does that often and people don't even
>>recognise him.
>>
>>
> You would know better than me.

Well, just from having seen the interview.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:36:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 14:28:30 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:35:49 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>One of my favorite comedians, btw..
>>> 
>>> Yes but (IMO) needs a good director, to keep him in check.
>>
>>Oh, no, when he goes off on his own doing stand-up, it's very funny.
>>Have a look for the interview on Inside the Actors Studio - the extended
>>version.  His energy levels are just crazy and it's all improv.
>>
>>As Lipton says at one point in the interview, "What the hell is going on
>>in there?"
>>
>>
> I meant as an actor not a stand up.

Oh, yeah, there is that.  Though the way he went and went and went in 
Aladdin was apparently very entertaining.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:34:45 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 12:55:45 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> I don't know, lets ask Darren?
>>> IIRC he was hot on apostrophes and commas are just fallen apostrophes.
>>
>>I'm pretty sure it is what I wrote.  :-)
>>
>>I think Darren probably stopped following this thread long ago. :-)
> 
> More sense than us, then :)

LOL, well, there is that.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:27:33 -0800, Darren New wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> I think Darren probably stopped following this thread long ago. :-)
> 
> Not so much following it as trying to skip over it. ;-)
> 
> I have no opinion on the subject at hand.

Trying to skip over it?  Not trying very hard, it seems. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 19 Dec 2008 17:01:56 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> You would know better than me.
>
>Well, just from having seen the interview.

As I said :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 19 Dec 2008 17:02:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> I meant as an actor not a stand up.
>
>Oh, yeah, there is that.  Though the way he went and went and went in 
>Aladdin was apparently very entertaining.

Not seen it 
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 19 Dec 2008 16:59:00 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:40:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> BTW what is the record for the longest thread of trivia?
>>>
>>>3,192,793 messages.  Why do you ask? ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> To see if it was worth carrying on :)
>
>And your conclusion?
>

I'll go for it ;)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:59:29 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>
>> 
>> What's stopping you then? ;)
>> 
>
>Not enough spare time.
>

I'm a fairy and my name is Nuff

Fairy Nuff :)

>>>> BTW what is the record for the longest thread of trivia?
>>> One of Andy's "Wondering" series?
>> 
>> I'm out of here.
>
>Awwe, I quite enjoyed his posts wondering about things. It brought out 
>some very interesting discussions and topics at times.

True and truer.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:58:02 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>
>> I flunked Chemistry :(
>
>Oh, shame. It was my best class. Biology on the other hand ..

I couldn't pronounce the long words never mind spell them. As for biology it was
not taught at my school In case it gave us ideas ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 19 Dec 2008 17:00:01 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>The problem with having large hard drives is remembering what's actually 
>on them and where it is.

And having several copies 
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:36:06 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 17:00:01 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>The problem with having large hard drives is remembering what's actually
>>on them and where it is.
> 
> And having several copies

There is that as well....

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:34:10 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:58:02 -0600, Mike Raiford
> <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> I flunked Chemistry :(
>>
>>Oh, shame. It was my best class. Biology on the other hand ..
> 
> I couldn't pronounce the long words never mind spell them. As for
> biology it was not taught at my school In case it gave us ideas ;)

LOL! I had trouble with the long words as well, though ultimately I could 
learn to say them.  Oddly enough, my first time through, I got a B on the 
labwork and failed the course.  Second time through, I got an A on the 
labwork adn a D on the classroom work.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:30:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:


>>And your conclusion?
>>
>>
> I'll go for it ;)

We have to be getting close. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:29:06 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 17:01:56 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> You would know better than me.
>>
>>Well, just from having seen the interview.
> 
> As I said :)

Indeed you did. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:29:48 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 17:02:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> I meant as an actor not a stand up.
>>
>>Oh, yeah, there is that.  Though the way he went and went and went in
>>Aladdin was apparently very entertaining.
> 
> Not seen it

In the interview I referred to before, he talks about it - I have only 
seen pieces of the final film myself.  What he said, though, was they had 
about 16 hours of material to choose from - he just started and kept on 
going.  The animators were there watching and getting ideas so they could 
animate the genie after the final lines were chosen.

A very nontraditional way for doing animation, at least for Disney. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 19 Dec 2008 17:59:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:30:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>
>>>And your conclusion?
>>>
>>>
>> I'll go for it ;)
>
>We have to be getting close. :-)
>

A bit to go yet.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 19 Dec 2008 13:09:35 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:30:28 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>Which reminds me, there's a really good video exploration of extra-
>>>dimensional mathematics, can't remember if it was posted here or not.
>>>I'll have to see if I can find it again, it was fascinating stuff.
>>>
>>>
>> Please do/
>
>Found it:
>
>http://www.dimensions-math.org/
>

OMG! 
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 19-Dec-08 19:09, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:30:28 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> 
>>> Which reminds me, there's a really good video exploration of extra-
>>> dimensional mathematics, can't remember if it was posted here or not.
>>> I'll have to see if I can find it again, it was fascinating stuff.
>>>
>>>
>> Please do/
> 
> Found it:
> 
> http://www.dimensions-math.org/
> 

I don't remember having seen this before. It was apparently created 
(mostly?) in POV and they say that it is even hosted on the povray site. 
So I'd expect there was an announcement on p.g or p.b.a. Can't find that 
however.

Post a reply to this message

On 19 Dec 2008 18:01:07 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:29:48 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 19 Dec 2008 17:02:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>> I meant as an actor not a stand up.
>>>
>>>Oh, yeah, there is that.  Though the way he went and went and went in
>>>Aladdin was apparently very entertaining.
>> 
>> Not seen it
>
>In the interview I referred to before, he talks about it - I have only 
>seen pieces of the final film myself.  What he said, though, was they had 
>about 16 hours of material to choose from - he just started and kept on 
>going.  The animators were there watching and getting ideas so they could 
>animate the genie after the final lines were chosen.
>
>A very nontraditional way for doing animation, at least for Disney. :-)
>

He said something similar in the interview I saw.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 19 Dec 2008 17:58:52 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>LOL! I had trouble with the long words as well, though ultimately I could 
>learn to say them.  Oddly enough, my first time through, I got a B on the 
>labwork and failed the course.  Second time through, I got an A on the 
>labwork adn a D on the classroom work.

I was just duff :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:51:07 +0000, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:

>On 19 Dec 2008 13:09:35 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:30:28 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>Which reminds me, there's a really good video exploration of extra-
>>>>dimensional mathematics, can't remember if it was posted here or not.
>>>>I'll have to see if I can find it again, it was fascinating stuff.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Please do/
>>
>>Found it:
>>
>>http://www.dimensions-math.org/
>>
>
>OMG! 

Thanks again, that was worth watching.

I think it should be hosted on the PovRay site (again)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:23:48 +0000, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:

>
>Thanks again, that was worth watching.
>
>I think it should be hosted on the PovRay site (again)

Another link

http://www.josleys.com/
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:49:11 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:23:48 +0000, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Thanks again, that was worth watching.
>>
>>I think it should be hosted on the PovRay site (again)
> 
> Another link
> 
> http://www.josleys.com/

Oooh, I'll have to check that one out, too. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:14:51 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 17:58:52 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>LOL! I had trouble with the long words as well, though ultimately I
>>could learn to say them.  Oddly enough, my first time through, I got a B
>>on the labwork and failed the course.  Second time through, I got an A
>>on the labwork adn a D on the classroom work.
> 
> I was just duff :)

I always learn better with hands-on classroom elements.  Straight 
memorisation is not my forte.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:35:01 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 17:59:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:30:29 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>And your conclusion?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'll go for it ;)
>>
>>We have to be getting close. :-)
>>
>>
> A bit to go yet.

A bit, or a byte? ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:14:15 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2008 18:01:07 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:29:48 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 Dec 2008 17:02:31 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> I meant as an actor not a stand up.
>>>>
>>>>Oh, yeah, there is that.  Though the way he went and went and went in
>>>>Aladdin was apparently very entertaining.
>>> 
>>> Not seen it
>>
>>In the interview I referred to before, he talks about it - I have only
>>seen pieces of the final film myself.  What he said, though, was they
>>had about 16 hours of material to choose from - he just started and kept
>>on going.  The animators were there watching and getting ideas so they
>>could animate the genie after the final lines were chosen.
>>
>>A very nontraditional way for doing animation, at least for Disney. :-)
>>
>>
> He said something similar in the interview I saw.

Where was that one? :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:54 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>>>
>> He said something similar in the interview I saw.
>
>Where was that one? :-)

He was over here recently, either that or it was an old programme. I can't
remember who the chat show host was. I don't think it was Jonathan Woss (may he
receive his P45) or I would not have watched it.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:29 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> A bit to go yet.
>
>A bit, or a byte? ;-)

Ah! Reminds me of a patch (remember them) I once had.
Love at first byte :)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:12 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

 
>>>LOL! I had trouble with the long words as well, though ultimately I
>>>could learn to say them.  Oddly enough, my first time through, I got a B
>>>on the labwork and failed the course.  Second time through, I got an A
>>>on the labwork adn a D on the classroom work.
>> 
>> I was just duff :)
>
>I always learn better with hands-on classroom elements.  Straight 
>memorisation is not my forte.
>

I don't know what it was with me and chemistry. I thought that I was good at it
until I went to university. It could have been zoology for all I knew. Or it
could have been the vast quantities of alcohol I consumed.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:38:17 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:54 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>> He said something similar in the interview I saw.
>>
>>Where was that one? :-)
> 
> He was over here recently, either that or it was an old programme. I
> can't remember who the chat show host was. I don't think it was Jonathan
> Woss (may he receive his P45) or I would not have watched it.

Guess I'll ahve to have a look at IMDB and see if I can determine what it 
was. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:43:01 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:12 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>>LOL! I had trouble with the long words as well, though ultimately I
>>>>could learn to say them.  Oddly enough, my first time through, I got a
>>>>B on the labwork and failed the course.  Second time through, I got an
>>>>A on the labwork adn a D on the classroom work.
>>> 
>>> I was just duff :)
>>
>>I always learn better with hands-on classroom elements.  Straight
>>memorisation is not my forte.
>>
>>
> I don't know what it was with me and chemistry. I thought that I was
> good at it until I went to university. It could have been zoology for
> all I knew. Or it could have been the vast quantities of alcohol I
> consumed.

LOL, that might just have had something to do with it.  :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:39:56 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 22 Dec 2008 12:42:29 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> A bit to go yet.
>>
>>A bit, or a byte? ;-)
> 
> Ah! Reminds me of a patch (remember them) I once had. Love at first byte
> :)

:-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 22 Dec 2008 18:00:53 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> I don't know what it was with me and chemistry. I thought that I was
>> good at it until I went to university. It could have been zoology for
>> all I knew. Or it could have been the vast quantities of alcohol I
>> consumed.
>
>LOL, that might just have had something to do with it.  :-)

It might have, indeed.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:28:01 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 22 Dec 2008 18:00:53 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> I don't know what it was with me and chemistry. I thought that I was
>>> good at it until I went to university. It could have been zoology for
>>> all I knew. Or it could have been the vast quantities of alcohol I
>>> consumed.
>>
>>LOL, that might just have had something to do with it.  :-)
> 
> It might have, indeed.

Now I just need to figure out my excuse, as I didn't really start 
drinking alcohol until after I'd left college....

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 23 Dec 2008 12:11:35 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:28:01 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 22 Dec 2008 18:00:53 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>> I don't know what it was with me and chemistry. I thought that I was
>>>> good at it until I went to university. It could have been zoology for
>>>> all I knew. Or it could have been the vast quantities of alcohol I
>>>> consumed.
>>>
>>>LOL, that might just have had something to do with it.  :-)
>> 
>> It might have, indeed.
>
>Now I just need to figure out my excuse, as I didn't really start 
>drinking alcohol until after I'd left college....
>

Well, I started going to the pub at lunchtime when I was in school (15 yo).
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:46:50 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 23 Dec 2008 12:11:35 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:28:01 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 Dec 2008 18:00:53 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> I don't know what it was with me and chemistry. I thought that I was
>>>>> good at it until I went to university. It could have been zoology
>>>>> for all I knew. Or it could have been the vast quantities of alcohol
>>>>> I consumed.
>>>>
>>>>LOL, that might just have had something to do with it.  :-)
>>> 
>>> It might have, indeed.
>>
>>Now I just need to figure out my excuse, as I didn't really start
>>drinking alcohol until after I'd left college....
>>
>>
> Well, I started going to the pub at lunchtime when I was in school (15
> yo).

That sounds like a good idea today. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 23 Dec 2008 13:24:51 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> Well, I started going to the pub at lunchtime when I was in school (15
>> yo).
>
>That sounds like a good idea today. :-)

It is well past lunchtime here but raise a glass to me when you go ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:39:59 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 23 Dec 2008 13:24:51 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> Well, I started going to the pub at lunchtime when I was in school (15
>>> yo).
>>
>>That sounds like a good idea today. :-)
> 
> It is well past lunchtime here but raise a glass to me when you go ;)

Well, it'll be here at home, tonight, while watching a movie, but will do.

We got more snow today. :-(

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 23 Dec 2008 16:43:20 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>Well, it'll be here at home, tonight, while watching a movie, but will do.
>

Sláinte

>We got more snow today. :-(

It is due to be a balmy 9°C here in London.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:56:09 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 23 Dec 2008 16:43:20 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Well, it'll be here at home, tonight, while watching a movie, but will
>>do.
>>
>>
> Sláinte

Cheers!

>>We got more snow today. :-(
> 
> It is due to be a balmy 9°C here in London.

28F here in Utah right now.  :-)

Time for movies to start! :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 24 Dec 2008 14:48:54 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:56:09 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 23 Dec 2008 16:43:20 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Well, it'll be here at home, tonight, while watching a movie, but will
>>>do.
>>>
>>>
>> Sláinte
>
>Cheers!
>
>>>We got more snow today. :-(
>> 
>> It is due to be a balmy 9°C here in London.
>
>28F here in Utah right now.  :-)
>
>Time for movies to start! :-)
>
>Jim

Happy Christmas.

To one and all.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 08:51:44 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> Happy Christmas.
> 
> To one and all.

And to you and yours - hope they were good!

(And you thought this thread was dead! ;-) )

Jim

Post a reply to this message