 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:30:08 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:09:27 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> But if the cat is dead will observing it make it live again?
>>> You can never know that answer.
>>
>> Why?
>
>Because ...
Why Mike why?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:30:08 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:09:27 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But if the cat is dead will observing it make it live again?
>>>> You can never know that answer.
>>> Why?
>> Because ...
>
> Why Mike why?
To make you ask why, that's why :)
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:54:42 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:30:08 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:09:27 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> But if the cat is dead will observing it make it live again?
>>>>> You can never know that answer.
>>>> Why?
>>> Because ...
>>
>> Why Mike why?
>
>To make you ask why, that's why :)
Why?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:35:19 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>> Where?
>>
>>
> Neither here, nor there ...
Maybe it's everywhere!
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:45:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2008 18:07:44 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Incoming! Duck!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Duck? Where!
>>>>>
>>>>> Over there!
>>>>
>>>>There?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Where?
>>
>>Where you said "over there!".
>>
>>
> That was then ;)
Well, you wrote that then, this is now, as I write this.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:48:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>Because as it happens, we didn't reach a conclusion. Wabbit.
>>
>>
> Does your mother sew?
As a matter of fact, she does. ;-)
>
> Well get her to stitch this!
>
> Wa Wa WABBITS!
>
> (Am I the only one that's read "Gladiators at law"?)
Probably. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 18 Dec 2008 18:01:40 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> (Am I the only one that's read "Gladiators at law"?)
>
>Probably. :-)
Shame, it was good.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 18 Dec 2008 18:01:07 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:45:46 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 17 Dec 2008 18:07:44 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> Incoming! Duck!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Duck? Where!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Over there!
>>>>>
>>>>>There?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Where?
>>>
>>>Where you said "over there!".
>>>
>>>
>> That was then ;)
>
>Well, you wrote that then, this is now, as I write this.
>
But not as I read it :(
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 18 Dec 2008 18:00:14 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:35:19 -0600, Mike Raiford wrote:
>
>
>>> Where?
>>>
>>>
>> Neither here, nor there ...
>
>Maybe it's everywhere!
>
Maybe it is.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:54:42 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:30:08 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:09:27 -0600, Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But if the cat is dead will observing it make it live again?
>>>>>> You can never know that answer.
>>>>> Why?
>>>> Because ...
>>> Why Mike why?
>> To make you ask why, that's why :)
>
> Why?
Are you training me for when my kid learns this word?
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
