 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
news:pf57k45mnf9puudgs7c3q9ad5c2l64jvhi@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:49:22 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dot com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
>>news:gpo5k4p39nvv01p1a9ogr456pcl3mgjogc@4ax.com...
>>> On 12 Dec 2008 16:34:30 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:22:25 +0000, St. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, that stopped me dead in my tracks... Did you know my real
>>>>> name is
>>>>> Elmer?
>>>>
>>>>Not completely dead in your tracks, obviously, you still were trying to
>>>>get the last word in. :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> No he wasn't, I was ;)
>>
>> You did... erm, but not now... ;)
>>
>
> You are right, you know.
Lol, I'm never right! ;)
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:11:21 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dot com> wrote:
>
> Lol, I'm never right! ;)
If you aren't Steve Wright, who are you?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
news:g567k4le3h2np1o8n83kjbt2ivd1g18el6@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:11:21 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dot com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Lol, I'm never right! ;)
>
> If you aren't Steve Wright, who are you?
Elmer!
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
St. wrote:
> Lol, I'm never right! ;)
>
You're left?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:18:57 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 12 Dec 2008 16:34:30 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:22:25 +0000, St. wrote:
>>
>>> Well, that stopped me dead in my tracks... Did you know my real
>>> name is
>>> Elmer?
>>
>>Not completely dead in your tracks, obviously, you still were trying to
>>get the last word in. :-)
>>
>>
> No he wasn't, I was ;)
Well, you still haven't succeeded. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 15 Dec 2008 14:23:02 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:18:57 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 12 Dec 2008 16:34:30 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:22:25 +0000, St. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well, that stopped me dead in my tracks... Did you know my real
>>>> name is
>>>> Elmer?
>>>
>>>Not completely dead in your tracks, obviously, you still were trying to
>>>get the last word in. :-)
>>>
>>>
>> No he wasn't, I was ;)
>
>Well, you still haven't succeeded. ;-)
>
That's a shame :(
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:14:45 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 15 Dec 2008 14:23:02 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:18:57 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 12 Dec 2008 16:34:30 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:22:25 +0000, St. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, that stopped me dead in my tracks... Did you know my real
>>>>> name is
>>>>> Elmer?
>>>>
>>>>Not completely dead in your tracks, obviously, you still were trying
>>>>to get the last word in. :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No he wasn't, I was ;)
>>
>>Well, you still haven't succeeded. ;-)
>>
>>
> That's a shame :(
Maybe for you. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 16 Dec 2008 21:30:23 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> That's a shame :(
>
>Maybe for you. ;-)
Indeed!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:58:59 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2008 21:30:23 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>> That's a shame :(
>>
>>Maybe for you. ;-)
>
> Indeed!
And yet here we still are. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On 17 Dec 2008 11:26:19 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>And yet here we still are. :-)
Stardust?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |