 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible wrote:
>> Some ISPs started blocking it or throttling speed by detecting the
>> protocol.
>
> Now, see, if I paid money to access the Internet, and then my ISP tried
> to prevent me accessing the Internet, I'd be... quite upset.
Except that the TOS generally allows them to do it.
--
Psychoceramics: The study of crackpots.
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>> Now, see, if I paid money to access the Internet, and then my ISP tried
>> to prevent me accessing the Internet, I'd be... quite upset.
>
> Except that the TOS generally allows them to do it.
Well then if the TOS says "you cannot use protocol X", you go find a
different ISP.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible wrote:
> So you're seriously suggesting that somebody did all that R&D just to
> illegally copy stuff?
Sure, if it means they can get loads of free music and movies. Human
nature 101.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Mueen Nawaz wrote:
> Not in the US. If your protests indeed disrupt the government, or
> traffic, or so many other things, you get in trouble.
The protests are supposed to disrupt the government. It's *supposed* to
be OK, as long as it's peaceful.
Disrupting traffic gets you in trouble for disrupting traffic, not for
protesting.
Unfortunately, I think a great number of on-the-street level cops are
taking their clues from the high administrations and simply ignoring the
law and misusing their privileges.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> scott wrote:
>>> It's a damned PROTOCOL. It can't be
>>> illegal on its own. It's how you use it.
>> Hehe you could say the same with guns. Actually no, a much higher
>> proportion of people use guns for legal activity :-)
>
> Hmm not really... Guns were *made for* killing.
And killing is very often legal. We call it hunting. Or being a soldier.
And, indeed, most of the guns not used for hunting or soldiering aren't
made for killing, but for intimidating.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Invisible wrote:
> Well then if the TOS says "you cannot use protocol X", you go find a
> different ISP.
Unfortunately, choice is rather limited in most places, due to
government interference.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>> So you're seriously suggesting that somebody did all that R&D just to
>> illegally copy stuff?
>
> Sure, if it means they can get loads of free music and movies. Human
> nature 101.
That's like sayin DARPA was commissioned to design a system for mass
porn dissemination! o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> So you're seriously suggesting that somebody did all that R&D just to
>>> illegally copy stuff?
>>
>> Sure, if it means they can get loads of free music and movies. Human
>> nature 101.
>
> That's like sayin DARPA was commissioned to design a system for mass
> porn dissemination! o_O
>
You mean it wasn't? XD
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Mike Raiford wrote:
>> That's like sayin DARPA was commissioned to design a system for mass
>> porn dissemination! o_O
>>
>
> You mean it wasn't? XD
...this would radically alter my mental image of the US military. o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> ...this would radically alter my mental image of the US military. o_O
>
Heh. I remember in just about every commissary and exchange there being
certain "top shelf" magazines available for purchase. Wouldn't change my
perception a bit ...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |