Mike Raiford wrote:

> Someone scored 0...

Yes. And exactly how hard do you think it is to real the source code for 
the client-side scripting to determine the perfect ordering? ;-)

> The test itself is rather diabolical, shifts in 
> subtle pastel hues are difficult to distinguish even in the best of 
> conditions.

Tell me about it...

Post a reply to this message

Tim Cook wrote:
> http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77
> 
>    *  Your score: 4
>    * Gender: Male
>    * Age range: 20-29
>    * Best score for your gender and age range: 0
>    * Highest score for your gender and age range: 1520
> 
> Did better than I expected.
> 
> -- 
> Tim Cook
> http://empyrean.freesitespace.net

Hmm. Not kidding:

# Score: 0
# Gender: Male
# Age Range: 30-39
# Best score for your gender and age range: 0
# Highest score for your gender and age range: 1468

Though, truthfully, in the reds, the fourth or fifth to the last "fit" 
for me only because it literally didn't fit in "any" other position in 
the pattern. Seems I do have a quirk in my color vision there, or maybe 
in the way firefox showed it, which made it seem a tiny bit too "bright" 
and "orange" for where it "should" be. If the test also let you remove 
colors that you think where either a) the same or b) didn't belong, I 
would probably have scored a 2 or 3.

-- 
void main () {

     if version = "Vista" {
       call slow_by_half();
       call DRM_everything();
     }
     call functional_code();
   }
   else
     call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models, 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message

> Yes. And exactly how hard do you think it is to real the source code for 
> the client-side scripting to determine the perfect ordering? ;-)

Or just press print-screen and then use the colour-picker in your favourite 
paint program.

>> The test itself is rather diabolical, shifts in subtle pastel hues are 
>> difficult to distinguish even in the best of conditions.
>
> Tell me about it...

But if people are often scoring in the 0-5 range, it looks a tiny bit on the 
easy side if anything to me.

Post a reply to this message

Tim Cook wrote:
> http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77
> 
>    *  Your score: 4
>    * Gender: Male
>    * Age range: 20-29
>    * Best score for your gender and age range: 0
>    * Highest score for your gender and age range: 1520
> 
> Did better than I expected.
> 
> -- 
> Tim Cook
> http://empyrean.freesitespace.net

I just did it and had to put my eyes back in...

     *  Your score: 0
     * Gender: Male
     * Age range: 30-39
     * Best score for your gender and age range: 0
     * Highest score for your gender and age range: 1468



When I thought I had it all lined up I would swap pairs one at a time. 
That highlighted any mistakes pretty quickly because looking at only 4 
at a time made the oddball stand out.


I had the most trouble with the purple colors.



My eyes hurt now....

Post a reply to this message

* Your score: 74
     * Gender: Male
     * Age range: 30-39
     * Best score for your gender and age range: 0
     * Highest score for your gender and age range: 1468

But of course I have slight color-blindness anyway...

Sam

Post a reply to this message