POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Dell go to hell Server Time
6 Nov 2024 02:24:08 EST (-0500)
  Dell go to hell (Message 1 to 10 of 17)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 7 Messages >>>
From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Dell go to hell
Date: 31 Aug 2008 04:02:44
Message: <48ba5024$1@news.povray.org>
http://changelog.complete.org/posts/741-From-Dell,-a-Uniquely-Terrible-Experience.html

Sweet...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Dell go to hell
Date: 31 Aug 2008 04:59:29
Message: <48ba5d71@news.povray.org>
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>
http://changelog.complete.org/posts/741-From-Dell,-a-Uniquely-Terrible-Experience.html

  What I find more puzzling is some of the answers to that blog entry.

  Some people seem to think that receiving unsolicited junk mail is *normal*,
and that you should simply live with it. After all, it's not all that much
of a nuisance, isn't it? They seem to think that if someone actually does
something to enforce his legal rights to not to receive unsolicited junk
mail, he is being a prick.

  IMO companies should be put in their places. Invading people's privacy,
no matter how lightly, without their consent is never acceptable.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Dell go to hell
Date: 31 Aug 2008 09:33:20
Message: <48ba9da0@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:

>   What I find more puzzling is some of the answers to that blog entry.
> 
>   Some people seem to think that receiving unsolicited junk mail is *normal*,
> and that you should simply live with it. After all, it's not all that much
> of a nuisance, isn't it? They seem to think that if someone actually does
> something to enforce his legal rights to not to receive unsolicited junk
> mail, he is being a prick.
> 
>   IMO companies should be put in their places. Invading people's privacy,
> no matter how lightly, without their consent is never acceptable.

I'm with you on this one...

I've actually been thinking about charging companies for the time I have 
to waste securely destroying the "HERE IS YOUR PRIORITY LOAN 
APPLICATION!" forms they keep sending me with my personal data 
preprinted on them. If I were to just throw these in the bin, no doubt 
some evil person could use them to steal my identity. So I have to spend 
time and effort destroying them properly.

Now if *I* were to inconvinience *them* in such a manner, surely they 
would charge me for their time? But I somehow suspect if I tried to 
invoice them for *my* wasted time, I wouldn't actually see any money...



By the way... I have no idea if this is true or not. It probably isn't. 
But it's very amusing anyway... The story goes that some guy took all 
the prepaid form return envelopes he'd been sent, filled them all with 
penny coins (nearly worthless, but quite heavy) and mailed them back. 
The advertisers were charged additional postage due to the heavy items. 
When they complained, the guy said he had mailed the money to them by 
mistake, AND DEMANDED THEY RETURN THE FUNDS! So the companies had to 
expend more money posting cheques to him.

Like I said, probably completely ficticious, but very amusing none the 
less... ;-)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Dell go to hell
Date: 31 Aug 2008 11:01:41
Message: <48bab255$1@news.povray.org>
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> 
> Like I said, probably completely ficticious, but very amusing none the 
> less... ;-)
> 

It has to be true - I've read it from the Internet.

-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
    http://www.zbxt.net
       aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid


Post a reply to this message

From: Mueen Nawaz
Subject: Re: Dell go to hell
Date: 31 Aug 2008 11:05:24
Message: <48bab334$1@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:
> of a nuisance, isn't it? They seem to think that if someone actually does
> something to enforce his legal rights to not to receive unsolicited junk
> mail, he is being a prick.

	Until I read this, I didn't know one had legal rights to prevent such 
mailings...

>   IMO companies should be put in their places. Invading people's privacy,
> no matter how lightly, without their consent is never acceptable.

	I fail to see how this is an invasion of privacy.

-- 
It is kisstomary to cuss the bride.


                     /\  /\               /\  /
                    /  \/  \ u e e n     /  \/  a w a z
                        >>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
                                    anl


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Dell go to hell
Date: 31 Aug 2008 13:38:02
Message: <48bad6fa@news.povray.org>
Mueen Nawaz <m.n### [at] ieeeorg> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > of a nuisance, isn't it? They seem to think that if someone actually does
> > something to enforce his legal rights to not to receive unsolicited junk
> > mail, he is being a prick.

>         Until I read this, I didn't know one had legal rights to prevent such 
> mailings...

  Once again, when we talk about what's "legal" and not, we should immediately
take into account the country we are speaking about.

  In many countries (like here) individuals have the right to demand
companies to remove their personal information from their databases so
that they will not send junk nor make any calls anymore.

> >   IMO companies should be put in their places. Invading people's privacy,
> > no matter how lightly, without their consent is never acceptable.

>         I fail to see how this is an invasion of privacy.

  If you started every day putting some dog droppings into your neighbour's
mailbox, I'm pretty sure you would be stopped sooner than later, by legal
means. I don't know if the technical legal term has the word "privacy" in
it, but that's not really relevant.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Dell go to hell
Date: 31 Aug 2008 13:43:54
Message: <48bad85a$1@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:
> 
>   In many countries (like here) individuals have the right to demand
> companies to remove their personal information from their databases so
> that they will not send junk nor make any calls anymore.
> 

IIRC the law in Finland says that you can demand A) to get told every 
detail they have of you and B) remove that information from any database 
of any firm.

Dunno though, I guess there'll be some obstacles, if you'll try to ie. 
remove your credit-failing information from the banks database by that 
law :).

-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
    http://www.zbxt.net
       aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: Dell go to hell
Date: 1 Sep 2008 05:09:13
Message: <48bbb139@news.povray.org>
>
http://changelog.complete.org/posts/741-From-Dell,-a-Uniquely-Terrible-Experience.html
>
> Sweet...

Someone has too much spare time on their hands...  TO put that much effort 
in if he had received a faulty product etc, ok, but to spend that much time 
over a catalogue once a month!?!?!? WTF?  I wish I had enough time to do 
that for all the catalogues, magazines and newspapers I get for free.


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Dell go to hell
Date: 1 Sep 2008 05:12:39
Message: <48bbb207$1@news.povray.org>
scott wrote:

> Someone has too much spare time on their hands...

Probably. But I'd sure like to get Blackhorse Finance to stop sending me 
loan offers. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to arrange that.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have an lambda interpretter to debug...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: Dell go to hell
Date: 1 Sep 2008 05:13:39
Message: <48bbb243@news.povray.org>
>  If you started every day putting some dog droppings into your neighbour's
> mailbox, I'm pretty sure you would be stopped sooner than later, by legal
> means.

That's slightly different to a catalogue though.  Is there really a law that 
prevents anyone from putting anything (sensible) in a mailbox if they 
haven't been asked to?  I guess it's a small price to pay for the 
convenience of not having to go to the post office every morning to get your 
mail.


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 7 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.