 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> (The document I have is, however, not interesting. Even slightly.
> Actually, it's hard to see what's so confidential about it.)
When I worked for Bellcore, I once got a document marked "CONFIDENTIAL!"
whose only content was
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
* 0 #
The author admitted it was easier to mark everything confidential than
to actually think about it. Apparently the lawyers hadn't told him
that's counterproductive. (Basically, if you mark something as
confidential that you've already distributed widely in public, you're
implying that the other things you've marked confidential can also be
distributed widely in public.)
Some of the people in the meeting even framed the document with the
proprietary notice highlighted and hung it up in their office.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Ever notice how people in a zombie movie never already know how to
kill zombies? Ask 100 random people in America how to kill someone
who has reanimated from the dead in a secret viral weapons lab,
and how many do you think already know you need a head-shot?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:29:18 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> Ooo... I just printed out some file I found, and it says on it
> "MICROSOFT CONFIDENTIAL - PROVIDED UNDER NDA. DO NOT REDISTRIBUTE."
>
> I wonder how we got hold of that...?
Someone probably signed a non-disclosure agreement. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] dev null> wrote in message
news:4899b265$1@news.povray.org...
> Gilles Tran wrote:
>
> > Apparently some Asus computers were sold with some files that should
have
> > been deleted but haven't, including keygens and information about
cracking
> > Vista... (GIYF)
>
> Ooo, that's *interesting*...
>
> (The document I have is, however, not interesting. Even slightly.
> Actually, it's hard to see what's so confidential about it.)
What is it about?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:4899991f$1@news.povray.org...
> Ooo... I just printed out some file I found, and it says on it
> "MICROSOFT CONFIDENTIAL - PROVIDED UNDER NDA. DO NOT REDISTRIBUTE."
>
> I wonder how we got hold of that...?
I seem to have a fair bit of stuff with that in these days. All nice
interesting stuff on %^&%#@!$%%&&(($%^#@@@$ ..... NO CARRIER .....
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> What is it about?
How OEMs can preconfigure the Windows Firewall. (Specifically, it
changed during SP2, didn't it?)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Orchid XP v8" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:4899fb7f$1@news.povray.org...
> Gail Shaw wrote:
>
> > What is it about?
>
> How OEMs can preconfigure the Windows Firewall. (Specifically, it
> changed during SP2, didn't it?)
Wouldn't know. I can ask if you're interested.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> What is it about?
>> How OEMs can preconfigure the Windows Firewall. (Specifically, it
>> changed during SP2, didn't it?)
> Wouldn't know. I can ask if you're interested.
Nah, I'm not that bothered.
It *is* kinda interesting that this file should just be randomly
floating around though when it says it's supposed to be "confidential".
I'm not sure why configuring a firewall should be confidential, but hey,
that's what it says... ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I wonder how we got hold of that...?
>
> Someone probably signed a non-disclosure agreement. ;-)
Figures. Some people round here will happily sign anything you push at
them. :-P
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:01:21 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>> I wonder how we got hold of that...?
>>
>> Someone probably signed a non-disclosure agreement. ;-)
>
> Figures. Some people round here will happily sign anything you push at
> them. :-P
I think that's true in many places. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>>> What is it about?
>
>>> How OEMs can preconfigure the Windows Firewall. (Specifically, it
>>> changed during SP2, didn't it?)
>
>> Wouldn't know. I can ask if you're interested.
>
> Nah, I'm not that bothered.
>
> It *is* kinda interesting that this file should just be randomly
> floating around though when it says it's supposed to be "confidential".
> I'm not sure why configuring a firewall should be confidential, but hey,
> that's what it says... ;-)
>
Think about it... If everyone knew how Dell and HP and others
preconfigured the windows firewall, there'd be 74325694256942769824698
sploits in the wild already circumventing those default rules.
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* gmail.com */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
