 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://www.xkcd.com/457/
Today's XKCD neatly sums up my feelings today.
I'm sitting at my desk with my office door wide open. I've just seem two
lovely girls walk past. I'm just bursting to go talk to them. But I
can't, because they walked past my door far too fast, and they're way
too busy having a girly chat with each other about the tradic exit of
Hot Sales Girl.
Damnit! Do you ever find yourself wishing you were a women just so girls
would talk to you?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] dev null> a écrit dans le message de news:
4892c69b$1@news.povray.org...
> http://www.xkcd.com/457/
>
> Today's XKCD neatly sums up my feelings today.
Hmm, I think that the strip just means that undoing bras is friggin'
difficult (see the alt text), particularly when one is in a hurry. Those
little hooks on the back always get caught somewhere. It's certainly one the
most annoying piece of garment to undo, only second to baby clothes with
thousands of hidden clip-on buttons. Who design these things?
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> http://www.xkcd.com/457/
Somebody in the forums asked if the cube configuration depicted is
actually obtainable with a real cube. You have NO IDEA how many people
posted pictures of their cube in this configuration!
Personally, *I* want to know if access to a girl's bra is actually
obtainable with a real girl... :-/
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran wrote:
> Hmm, I think that the strip just means that undoing bras is friggin'
> difficult (see the alt text), particularly when one is in a hurry. Those
> little hooks on the back always get caught somewhere. It's certainly one the
> most annoying piece of garment to undo, only second to baby clothes with
> thousands of hidden clip-on buttons. Who design these things?
Pretty much.
Somebody in the forums said "hey guys, if 12 year old girls can do it
without difficulty, how hard can it possibly be?"
Personally, I haven't tried, so I couldn't comment... It would seem like
it should be far *harder* for the girl herself though. She has to reach
behind her back FFS!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:56:25 +0100, Gilles Tran
<gil### [at] agroparistechfr> did spake, saying:
> only second to baby clothes with
> thousands of hidden clip-on buttons. Who design these things?
The international league of fastener manufacturers who secretly dominate
the clothing industry.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> The international league of fastener manufacturers who secretly dominate
> the clothing industry.
Is that something like the freemasons who secretly caused the design of
terrible buildings?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:32:03 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake, saying:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>
>> The international league of fastener manufacturers who secretly
>> dominate the clothing industry.
>
> Is that something like the freemasons who secretly caused the design of
> terrible buildings?
The Freemasons are an offshoot; they're more like the Zionist conspiracy
that had all the vowels removed from unix commands.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> http://www.xkcd.com/457/
>
> Today's XKCD neatly sums up my feelings today.
Actually, if this how bras worked, then natural selection would greatly
increase human intelligence. Or decrease the wearing of bras.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:4892cfbf$1@news.povray.org...
> Personally, I haven't tried, so I couldn't comment... It would seem like
> it should be far *harder* for the girl herself though. She has to reach
> behind her back FFS!
>
Practice.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> Practice.
Daily?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:4892fe4a@news.povray.org...
> Gail Shaw wrote:
>
> > Practice.
>
> Daily?
>
What do you think?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> Practice.
>> Daily?
> What do you think?
I think that me trying to work a bra would probably be like my mum
trying to work a computer keyboard... :^)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> a écrit dans le message de news:
4893084b$1@news.povray.org...
> I think that me trying to work a bra would probably be like my mum trying
> to work a computer keyboard... :^)
You could borrow your mum's bra, lend her your keyboard and then practice
together for one hour every day. Fun for the whole family!
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran wrote:
> You could borrow your mum's bra, lend her your keyboard and then practice
> together for one hour every day. Fun for the whole family!
That is possibly the most worrying mental image I've had today... :-}
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>
> Somebody in the forums said "hey guys, if 12 year old girls can do it
> without difficulty, how hard can it possibly be?"
>
It's not that hard, once you get used to it.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
>
> Actually, if this how bras worked, then natural selection would greatly
> increase human intelligence. Or decrease the wearing of bras.
It would most probably increase bra sales, since so much of them would
just break down.
> Regards,
> John
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
> Actually, if this how bras worked, then natural selection would greatly
> increase human intelligence. Or decrease the wearing of bras.
Several girls remarked in the forums that this would somewhat prevent
them going out with stupid boys, which was generally agreed to be a very
positive thing...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> John VanSickle wrote:
>
>> Actually, if this how bras worked, then natural selection would
>> greatly increase human intelligence. Or decrease the wearing of bras.
>
> Several girls remarked in the forums that this would somewhat prevent
> them going out with stupid boys, which was generally agreed to be a very
> positive thing...
It should go without saying that a girl who reads XKCD would only date
stupid boys in order to manipulate them.
Of course, this is also the reason women date intelligent men, so it's
not saying much.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Personally, *I* want to know if access to a girl's bra is actually
> obtainable with a real girl... :-/
I can attest that it is ;)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Personally, *I* want to know if access to a girl's bra is actually
>> obtainable with a real girl... :-/
>
> I can attest that it is ;)
I'd ask if there's a HOWTO somewhere, but I imagine it wouldn't actually
help much...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> Personally, *I* want to know if access to a girl's bra is actually
>>> obtainable with a real girl... :-/
>>
>> I can attest that it is ;)
>
> I'd ask if there's a HOWTO somewhere, but I imagine it wouldn't actually
> help much...
>
Dude, just stop feeling sorry for yourself and ask girls out!
Sure, you'll be rejected 9 times out of 10, but so is every other guy
out there! Just don't let it bother you!
Look at it this way:
There are 6 *billion* people on this planet. Just to pull a number out
of my a**, that means 500 *million* people between the ages of 20 and 30.
I guarantee, the *majority* of those people _want_to_have_sex_. They
don't want to all the time, and it's not the only thing they want, but
they *do* want to. It's in their genes! (Otherwise we would have gone
extinct long ago).
Now, if you can accept that people out there *do* want to hook up, the
next part is easy: just keep trying! What works with one person won't
work with the next, so any kind of advice from other people is pretty
much useless except for "don't give up". Talk to girls any chance you
get, and ask them out whenever you can!
You know those two girls you saw walking past your office? Don't wait
for them to walk past again. Just go find one of them, and say, "Hey,
have you seen the new Batman yet?"
If they say "no", then respond "I was going to go see it this weekend,
but I hate seeing movies alone. Will you go with me?"
If they say "yes", then say "Cool, I haven't yet! I was going to go see
it this weekend, but I hate seeing movies alone. Will you go with me?"
Even if you've already seen it*, it's not hard to find something
appropriate to say instead.
Sorry, I'm just rambling. But you get the idea - don't wait, just date!
*We saw it a second time two days ago. Very enjoyable. In fact, it put
me in a mood to watch the 1989 version (Tim Burton directing, Michael
Keaton starring), and I have to ask: was the 1989 version so cheesy when
it came out, or did they re-cut it to make the new one look better? I
remember liking it more at the time - of course, I *was* 10 :)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I'd ask if there's a HOWTO somewhere, but I imagine it wouldn't
>> actually help much...
>
> Dude, just stop feeling sorry for yourself and ask girls out!
Yeah - cos that thought has never occurred to me before. :-P
I don't *know* any girls, and I have no idea where to meet them. We've
been through all this several times already.
> Sorry, I'm just rambling. But you get the idea - don't wait, just date!
Sure. Because when you're not Andrew, it's really that easy. :-/
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gilles Tran" <gil### [at] agroparistechfr> wrote in message
news:4892cf0d$1@news.povray.org...
>
> "Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 4892c69b$1@news.povray.org...
>> http://www.xkcd.com/457/
>>
>> Today's XKCD neatly sums up my feelings today.
>
> Hmm, I think that the strip just means that undoing bras is friggin'
> difficult (see the alt text), particularly when one is in a hurry. Those
> little hooks on the back always get caught somewhere. It's certainly one
> the most annoying piece of garment to undo,
Heh, just move the hooks 'towards' the eyes, and everything is fine. ;)
Those hooks are designed to be released! :)
Are you listening Andrew? GRAB - TOWARDS - RELEASE - HEAVEN.
In that order. :)
~Steve~
> G.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa dot com> wrote in message
news:489304af@news.povray.org...
>
> "Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
> news:4892fe4a@news.povray.org...
>> Gail Shaw wrote:
>>
>> > Practice.
>>
>> Daily?
>>
>
> What do you think?
Hahaha! Oh dear, now my jaw is aching...lol. :)
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> Those hooks are designed to be released! :)
>
> Are you listening Andrew? GRAB - TOWARDS - RELEASE - HEAVEN.
>
> In that order. :)
Er... Isn't that GRAB - TOWARDS - RELEASE - HOSPITAL?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Orchid XP v8" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:4894cd83$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>
>> Those hooks are designed to be released! :)
>>
>> Are you listening Andrew? GRAB - TOWARDS - RELEASE - HEAVEN.
>>
>> In that order. :)
>
> Er... Isn't that GRAB - TOWARDS - RELEASE - HOSPITAL?
Mate, if you get *past* the GRAB part, there is no hospital. Fumble
away... :)
~Steve~
>
> --
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
> http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
> Look at it this way:
> There are 6 *billion* people on this planet. Just to pull a number out
> of my a**, that means 500 *million* people between the ages of 20 and 30.
> I guarantee, the *majority* of those people _want_to_have_sex_.
But half of them are of the wrong gender...
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
>> Look at it this way:
>> There are 6 *billion* people on this planet. Just to pull a number out
>> of my a**, that means 500 *million* people between the ages of 20 and 30.
>
>> I guarantee, the *majority* of those people _want_to_have_sex_.
>
> But half of them are of the wrong gender...
>
Not if you've an open mind...
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Sure. Because when you're not Andrew, it's really that easy. :-/
Andrew, seriously: It's hard for *everyone*. But people do it anyway.
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Er... Isn't that GRAB - TOWARDS - RELEASE - HOSPITAL?
>
> Mate, if you get *past* the GRAB part, there is no hospital. Fumble
> away... :)
They call me the fumbler,
Yeah the fumbler,
I fumble round and round and round and round...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Sure. Because when you're not Andrew, it's really that easy. :-/
>
> Andrew, seriously: It's hard for *everyone*. But people do it anyway.
Other people have social skills.
(And friends - don't forget friends! Apparently in a survay 80% of
people said they met their husband/wife through their friends.)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> Sure. Because when you're not Andrew, it's really that easy. :-/
>>
>> Andrew, seriously: It's hard for *everyone*. But people do it anyway.
>
> Other people have social skills.
>
Not all of them. I can say, from recent experience, that I have very bad
luck at reading what people are actually saying and meaning. That alone
is not enough of an excuse. Smiling helps, as does being able to talk to
them. Light conversation normally, it's not often that physics will come
up and the best conversation continuing device is "I wrote an RK4 solver
last week." but sometimes that will work too. "Hi, how are you, have you
seen New Movie Of The Week? What did you think of it/Would you like to
see it?"
> (And friends - don't forget friends! Apparently in a survay 80% of
> people said they met their husband/wife through their friends.)
>
This is easier then finding a date. Smile, and be ready to listen to
anyone. After you chat with them a few times, pick a day you aren't
doing anything and invite them out to a pub to continue what ever the
last conversation was.
See, now you've made a friend. You can do the whole thing without a pub,
substituting other local hang out.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Orchid XP v8" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:48957c80$1@news.povray.org...
>>> Er... Isn't that GRAB - TOWARDS - RELEASE - HOSPITAL?
>>
>> Mate, if you get *past* the GRAB part, there is no hospital. Fumble
>> away... :)
>
> They call me the fumbler,
> Yeah the fumbler,
> I fumble round and round and round and round...
HAHA! Yeah, that works... You're good at making those up. :)
~Steve~
>
> --
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
> http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> "Hi, how are you, have you
> seen New Movie Of The Week? What did you think of it/Would you like to
> see it?"
You'd have to know what New Movie Of The Week *is* first. ;-)
A better technique seems to be to just ask the person about themselves -
maybe that person isn't a film fanatic anyway?
>> (And friends - don't forget friends! Apparently in a survay 80% of
>> people said they met their husband/wife through their friends.)
>
> This is easier then finding a date. Smile, and be ready to listen to
> anyone. After you chat with them a few times, pick a day you aren't
> doing anything and invite them out to a pub to continue what ever the
> last conversation was.
>
> See, now you've made a friend. You can do the whole thing without a pub,
> substituting other local hang out.
I tried this. The person I was speaking to started laughing.
Hysterically.
Eventually she finished laughing her **** off, and politely declained.
I asked a different person by email. I couldn't help noticing that the
reply was written in very formal language, with strong undertones of
"please don't speak to me ever again".
I have tried and tried and tried to convince people to be friends with
me. So far, I have failed completely. What can I say? I guess people
just hate me...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> This is easier then finding a date. Smile, and be ready to listen to
>> anyone. After you chat with them a few times, pick a day you aren't
>> doing anything and invite them out to a pub to continue what ever the
>> last conversation was.
>>
>> See, now you've made a friend. You can do the whole thing without a
>> pub, substituting other local hang out.
>
> I tried this. The person I was speaking to started laughing.
>
> Hysterically.
>
> Eventually she finished laughing her **** off, and politely declained.
Wow, that girl's a jerk. Seriously, very few of them react this way.
Even though the others aren't such a**holes, though, you'll still get a
lot of rejections - the general rule of thumb for most solicitations,
whether it's for business or personal, is that one out of 10 will say
yes. So don't let these two experiences put you off, just keep trying.
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> This is easier then finding a date. Smile, and be ready to listen to
>>> anyone. After you chat with them a few times, pick a day you aren't
>>> doing anything and invite them out to a pub to continue what ever the
>>> last conversation was.
>>>
>>> See, now you've made a friend. You can do the whole thing without a
>>> pub, substituting other local hang out.
>>
>> I tried this. The person I was speaking to started laughing.
>>
>> Hysterically.
>>
>> Eventually she finished laughing her **** off, and politely declained.
>
> Wow, that girl's a jerk. Seriously, very few of them react this way.
I think she was surprised and embarrassed rather than actually trying to
be mean. Even so, it was *not* a pleasent reaction to receive.
> Even though the others aren't such a**holes, though, you'll still get a
> lot of rejections - the general rule of thumb for most solicitations,
> whether it's for business or personal, is that one out of 10 will say
> yes. So don't let these two experiences put you off, just keep trying.
Well, I've now "tried" with everybody I know. So until I discover some
way of meeting new people, there's nothing further I can do now.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> Not if you've an open mind...
Damned neurosurgeons...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gilles Tran" <gil### [at] agroparistechfr> wrote in message
news:4892cf0d$1@news.povray.org...
>
> "Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 4892c69b$1@news.povray.org...
>> http://www.xkcd.com/457/
>>
>> Today's XKCD neatly sums up my feelings today.
>
> Hmm, I think that the strip just means that undoing bras is friggin'
> difficult (see the alt text), particularly when one is in a hurry. Those
> little hooks on the back always get caught somewhere.
Yes, caught on the inside of the washing machine and the clothes dryer!
Brian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> a écrit dans le message de news:
4894ea70@news.povray.org...
> Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
>> Look at it this way:
>> There are 6 *billion* people on this planet. Just to pull a number out
>> of my a**, that means 500 *million* people between the ages of 20 and 30.
>
>> I guarantee, the *majority* of those people _want_to_have_sex_.
>
> But half of them are of the wrong gender...
If that was the case, mankind would have disappeared a long time ago.
Really, both genders definitely want to have sex, and want it a lot. One
gender may be slightly (but only slightly) pickier than the other, but it's
not less obsessive/ravenous in its pursuit of it.
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran wrote:
> Really, both genders definitely want to have sex, and want it a lot. One
> gender may be slightly (but only slightly) pickier than the other, but it's
> not less obsessive/ravenous in its pursuit of it.
This is something that has always confused me...
The boys all want to get at the girls. Nothing complicated there.
Girls are far more confusing. Your typical girl seems to definitely
*want* a boyfriend, and is very keen to show off just how sexy and
desirable she is. But as soon as a *real* boy attempts to make any kind
of advance towards her, she seems deeply offended at the very
*suggestion* that she might want to actually date such a pathetic excuse
for a boy. Obviously she's looking for somebody far better then HIM!
Even if you start seeing her regularly and she seems to enjoy being with
you, she still seems insulted and outraged that you might want to kiss
her. And she is utterly repulsed by the concept that you might be
thinking about having sex with her (much less try to actually *do* this
for real). Apparently she just wants to hang out together and maybe hold
hands or something.
So I'm confused - how has the human race not died out yet?
I distinctly remember that when I was about 12 or so, I became utterly
fascinated with girls. I seemed to spend almost every waking hour
thinking about them, feeling curios about them, wanting to have one of
my own, wondering what they're like, etc. I'm reasonably certain I'm not
alone in this. (!)
Presumably what's meant to happen next is that you start interactive
with girls, find out a bit about them, start dating them, and gradually
stop being quite so fascinated by them. (Personally, this still hasn't
happened for me yet - presumably because I never interact with
*anybody*, much less girls...)
I have never actually met a teenage girl in my entire life. [Ever.] So
I'm curios... Do teenage girls suddenly become absolutely fascinated
with boys in a similar way? Or are they *always* completely disgusted by
the idea of interacting with them? Is it just an act? Or do girls
genuinely hate boys?
Since the human race hasn't died out yet, you'd think it *must* be an
act. But I don't know... that's some damned good acting... :-/
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran <gil### [at] agroparistechfr> wrote:
> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> a ?crit dans le message de news:
> 4894ea70@news.povray.org...
> > Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
> >> Look at it this way:
> >> There are 6 *billion* people on this planet. Just to pull a number out
> >> of my a**, that means 500 *million* people between the ages of 20 and 30.
> >
> >> I guarantee, the *majority* of those people _want_to_have_sex_.
> >
> > But half of them are of the wrong gender...
> If that was the case, mankind would have disappeared a long time ago.
> Really, both genders definitely want to have sex, and want it a lot.
But in most cases half of them are still of the wrong gender.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> I have never actually met a teenage girl in my entire life. [Ever.]
OK, I'm curious. Where did you go to school when *you* were a teenager?
In my high school, there were approximately 800 boys and 800 girls,
all between the ages of 14-18.
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I have never actually met a teenage girl in my entire life. [Ever.]
>
> OK, I'm curious. Where did you go to school when *you* were a teenager?
> In my high school, there were approximately 800 boys and 800 girls, all
> between the ages of 14-18.
The school I went to was for boys only. (Did I mention it was a boarding
school?)
If you count my little sister then yes, technically I have met a teenage
girl. Although being at boarding school, I didn't actually *see* her
very often...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> OK, I'm curious. Where did you go to school when *you* were a
>> teenager? In my high school, there were approximately 800 boys and 800
>> girls, all between the ages of 14-18.
>
> The school I went to was for boys only. (Did I mention it was a boarding
> school?)
Also... That school had roughly 40 kids in it. And almost as many staff...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
