 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'd like to share a little something with you.
As you may remember, my friend Marcus took me on a shopping trip
recently. Well, I attempted to photograph the result:
http://download.orphi.me.uk/Photos/BeforeAfter.html
Hmm... Photographing yourself is *really* hard! :-/
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> http://download.orphi.me.uk/Photos/BeforeAfter.html
You should change your hairstyle.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> You should change your hairstyle.
What, like this?
http://download.orphi.me.uk/Photos/Spikey.jpg
Actually, my sister pointed out the other day that I've had the same
hairstyle since I was 5 years old. And this is a "bad" thing??
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's an Indiana Jones shirt! Is your friend Marcus Brody?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:31:11 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>
>Hmm... Photographing yourself is *really* hard! :-/
They don't do you justice.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:29:33 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>Actually, my sister pointed out the other day that I've had the same
>hairstyle since I was 5 years old. And this is a "bad" thing??
Perhaps one of these would work for you?
http://j-walkblog.com/index.php?/weblog/posts/hairstyle_gallery/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> They don't do you justice.
How do you know? For all y - oh, it's you. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Actually, my sister pointed out the other day that I've had the same
>> hairstyle since I was 5 years old. And this is a "bad" thing??
>
> Perhaps one of these would work for you?
>
> http://j-walkblog.com/index.php?/weblog/posts/hairstyle_gallery/
The lady in the bottom-right corner: What the HELL are you smoking?!
Seriously luv, SORT IT OUT!!
Jesus... o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:31:11 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>
>> Hmm... Photographing yourself is *really* hard! :-/
>
> They don't do you justice.
Step your aperture a bit to cut the background light, and use a flash.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kyle wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:29:33 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>
>> Actually, my sister pointed out the other day that I've had the same
>> hairstyle since I was 5 years old. And this is a "bad" thing??
>
> Perhaps one of these would work for you?
>
> http://j-walkblog.com/index.php?/weblog/posts/hairstyle_gallery/
>
>
>
Where was this last week when I was looking for a hair style gallery?
Probably right where it is now, but I couldn't find it.
I really need to stop driving 2 hours to see my stylist but I can't find
any programmers around here who will look at me and say "No way,
sweetie, that hair style will not work on you." until after I already
look silly.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:28:56 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <"ykgp at
vtSPAM.edu"> wrote:
>
>I really need to stop driving 2 hours to see my stylist
Once you've found one never let him go.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> http://download.orphi.me.uk/Photos/BeforeAfter.html
>
> You should change your hairstyle.
change?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> I really need to stop driving 2 hours to see my stylist but I can't find
> any programmers around here who will look at me and say "No way,
> sweetie, that hair style will not work on you." until after I already
> look silly.
Can you clarify where "here" is?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> That's an Indiana Jones shirt! Is your friend Marcus Brody?
LOL!
WTH?!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> Step your aperture a bit to cut the background light, and use a flash.
1. What's an aperture? [No GLaDDOS jokes please.]
2. Will a flash make any difference in an outdoor scene shot from a
distance of 25 feet?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:48576d0f$1@news.povray.org...
> Zeger Knaepen wrote:
>> That's an Indiana Jones shirt! Is your friend Marcus Brody?
>
> LOL!
>
> WTH?!
http://www.toddscostumes.com/indy/indiana_jones_shirt.htm
That does have a very close resemblance to your shirt, doesn't it? :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> That's an Indiana Jones shirt! Is your friend Marcus Brody?
>> LOL!
>>
>> WTH?!
>
> http://www.toddscostumes.com/indy/indiana_jones_shirt.htm
>
> That does have a very close resemblance to your shirt, doesn't it? :)
Damn, the photography is worse than I thought... *my* shirt is _white_,
and has _stripes_. o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:31:11 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake, saying:
> I'd like to share a little something with you.
>
> As you may remember, my friend Marcus took me on a shopping trip
> recently. Well, I attempted to photograph the result:
>
> http://download.orphi.me.uk/Photos/BeforeAfter.html
>
> Hmm... Photographing yourself is *really* hard! :-/
Look at those shiny shiny trousers, the second photo is much better though
you need an iron on that shirt; hmm the rolled-up sleeve thing is
definitely you.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:48577946$1@news.povray.org...
>>>> That's an Indiana Jones shirt! Is your friend Marcus Brody?
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> WTH?!
>>
>> http://www.toddscostumes.com/indy/indiana_jones_shirt.htm
>>
>> That does have a very close resemblance to your shirt, doesn't it? :)
>
> Damn, the photography is worse than I thought... *my* shirt is _white_,
> and has _stripes_. o_O
well, actually, the real Indiana Jones shirt is more white than khaki :)
but it doesn't have stripes, that would be an Indiana Jails shirt
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:52:55 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>
>> Step your aperture a bit to cut the background light, and use a flash.
>
>1. What's an aperture? [No GLaDDOS jokes please.]
The aperture on a camera is a hole or an opening through which light
is admitted. Besides letting in more or less light it controls the
depth of field. A small aperture gives a greater depth of field. It is
also referred to as the f number or stops. I assume that Sabrina meant
for you to decrease the aperture to cut down the total light entering
the camera and use the flash as a fill in light. You would need to use
your camera in manual mode as in automatic it would increase the
exposure time to compensate.
>2. Will a flash make any difference in an outdoor scene shot from a
>distance of 25 feet?
One can only suck it and see.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> Look at those shiny shiny trousers, the second photo is much better
> though you need an iron on that shirt; hmm the rolled-up sleeve thing is
> definitely you.
Now you understand what I mean by "paying money for clothes that look
wrecked already"? The shirt was wrinkled up like that in the shop.
Apparently it's meant to look like that. Similarly, the jeans were
half-faded to hell already. As for the sleeves, they're actually
buttoned up like that. I have no idea why...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The aperture on a camera is a hole or an opening through which light
> is admitted. Besides letting in more or less light it controls the
> depth of field. A small aperture gives a greater depth of field. It is
> also referred to as the f number or stops. I assume that Sabrina meant
> for you to decrease the aperture to cut down the total light entering
I'd say open up the aperture actually, to blur the background and make
Andrew stand out more. Increase the shutter speed to compensate for the
increased aperture, then increase it further until the background is a bit
darker. Then use some flash to make Andrew appear at a satisfactory
brightness.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> Step your aperture a bit to cut the background light, and use a flash.
>> 1. What's an aperture? [No GLaDDOS jokes please.]
>
> The aperture on a camera is a hole or an opening through which light
> is admitted. Besides letting in more or less light it controls the
> depth of field. A small aperture gives a greater depth of field. It is
> also referred to as the f number or stops. I assume that Sabrina meant
> for you to decrease the aperture to cut down the total light entering
> the camera and use the flash as a fill in light. You would need to use
> your camera in manual mode as in automatic it would increase the
> exposure time to compensate.
Right. So sharp images require bright illumination and/or a long shutter
time?
Did I mention that my camera really struggles to produce a visible image
except in the most blindingly brilliant sunshine? Seriously, you can use
it as a webcam, but unless you're standing with a laptop next to
Stonehenge at noon on the Summer Solstice, the image just comes out dark
brown. My camera just seems to have a superlatively insensitive light
detector...
>> 2. Will a flash make any difference in an outdoor scene shot from a
>> distance of 25 feet?
>
> One can only suck it and see.
Hey, I'm just glad I got the whole of me in shot that time.
In order to take these pictures, I had to find an object of
approximately the correct height, balance the camera on it, align the
camera to where I think I'm going to stand, set it to timer mode, press
the button, walk over to the spot I think it's aimed at, strike a pose,
wait for the camera to shoot, walk back to the camera and check the shot.
Needless to say, I got bored of this very quickly. The 2nd shot is the
best image I managed to get all day. :-/ And even then I had to crop it
to get the right parts into shot. (It would have helped if the camera
was at head height rather than knee height!)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Stephen wrote:
>
>> They don't do you justice.
>
> How do you know? For all y - oh, it's you. ;-)
Fancy a drink on Saturday?
I might wear the outfit. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:19:15 +0200, "scott" <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:
>> The aperture on a camera is a hole or an opening through which light
>> is admitted. Besides letting in more or less light it controls the
>> depth of field. A small aperture gives a greater depth of field. It is
>> also referred to as the f number or stops. I assume that Sabrina meant
>> for you to decrease the aperture to cut down the total light entering
>
>I'd say open up the aperture actually, to blur the background and make
>Andrew stand out more. Increase the shutter speed to compensate for the
>increased aperture, then increase it further until the background is a bit
>darker. Then use some flash to make Andrew appear at a satisfactory
>brightness.
>
Probably better, I wish Sabrina had said step up or down. There are a
few ways of doing what's wanted but the best is to bracket the normal
exposure IMHO.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:24:28 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>
>Right. So sharp images require bright illumination and/or a long shutter
>time?
Yes and no :)
Long shutter times can induce blur from hand shake or other movements.
It is a balance getting the correct exposure.
>Did I mention that my camera really struggles to produce a visible image
>except in the most blindingly brilliant sunshine? Seriously, you can use
>it as a webcam, but unless you're standing with a laptop next to
>Stonehenge at noon on the Summer Solstice, the image just comes out dark
>brown. My camera just seems to have a superlatively insensitive light
>detector...
Hmm! A digital camera then. Have you checked the mode you are using it
in and/or the settings? From what you say it sounds duff or the ASA
(film sensitivity in non-digital cameras) setting is wrong but the
photos look OK.
In the first one were you just pleased to see me? :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:25:00 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> They don't do you justice.
>>
>> How do you know? For all y - oh, it's you. ;-)
>
>Fancy a drink on Saturday?
I'll have to check the day, I'll come back
>I might wear the outfit. ;-)
I'm not a fashion Queen
So "Frankly my dear" … :)
[Quote from "Gone with the wind"]
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Fancy a drink on Saturday?
>
> I'll have to check the day, I'll come back
OK. I'm not 100% sure what I'm doing either, but I think I'll be free...
>> I might wear the outfit. ;-)
>
> I'm not a fashion Queen
> So "Frankly my dear" … :)
>
> [Quote from "Gone with the wind"]
[Apparently it was meant to be "I don't really care"...]
Actually, my line almost looks like I'm flirting. o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:19:04 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake, saying:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>
>> Look at those shiny shiny trousers, the second photo is much better
>> though you need an iron on that shirt; hmm the rolled-up sleeve thing
>> is definitely you.
>
> Now you understand what I mean by "paying money for clothes that look
> wrecked already"? The shirt was wrinkled up like that in the shop.
> Apparently it's meant to look like that.
Pfft that's just so they can sell it, just iron the damn thing :-P
> Similarly, the jeans were half-faded to hell already. As for the
> sleeves, they're actually buttoned up like that. I have no idea why...
Oookay.
Ah joy I've just upgraded to Opera 9.5 which feels like upgrading XP to
Vista; it didn't import passwords, mail, or the spell checker and now I've
got some of it working it's not marking incoming replies to my own posts -
how fun.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:51:02 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>
>OK. I'm not 100% sure what I'm doing either, but I think I'll be free...
Saturday is not one of my favourite days to be in town for a drink but
if you give me a few hours …
>>> I might wear the outfit. ;-)
>>
>> I'm not a fashion Queen
>> So "Frankly my dear" … :)
>>
>> [Quote from "Gone with the wind"]
>
>[Apparently it was meant to be "I don't really care"...]
>
>Actually, my line almost looks like I'm flirting. o_O
Best of British :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:28:56 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <"ykgp at vtSPAM.edu"> wrote:
>Where was this last week when I was looking for a hair style gallery?
>Probably right where it is now, but I couldn't find it.
Probably. I found it at images.google.com, search for "hairstyle", second or third
hit.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> I really need to stop driving 2 hours to see my stylist but I can't find
> any programmers around here who will look at me and say "No way,
> sweetie, that hair style will not work on you." until after I already
> look silly.
Way sweetie, it works.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> That's an Indiana Jones shirt! Is your friend Marcus Brody?
It's really just a pretty standard African safari shirt, methinks. Sort
of like a pith helmet and all. I bought one very similar when I went to
Africa.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Helpful housekeeping hints:
Check your feather pillows for holes
before putting them in the washing machine.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:15:11 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom>
wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:51:02 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>
>>
>>OK. I'm not 100% sure what I'm doing either, but I think I'll be free...
>
>Saturday is not one of my favourite days to be in town for a drink but
>if you give me a few hours …
I'm quite booked up for the next three weekends. If you can manage mid
week sometime, say next Thursday (26th) we might be able to twist Dr
John's arm. Maybe food and a drink :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> I'm quite booked up for the next three weekends. If you can manage mid
> week sometime, say next Thursday (26th) we might be able to twist Dr
> John's arm. Maybe food and a drink :)
Sounds good to me... ;-)
Although I don't get back to MK after work until about 6 PM.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:30:03 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>
>> I'm quite booked up for the next three weekends. If you can manage mid
>> week sometime, say next Thursday (26th) we might be able to twist Dr
>> John's arm. Maybe food and a drink :)
>
>Sounds good to me... ;-)
>
>Although I don't get back to MK after work until about 6 PM.
That would mean getting to London about 8 p.m. If you went straight to
the train station we could meet there then go for something to eat,
directly. Gaining some (drinking) time. :)
Of course it's up to you.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Sounds good to me... ;-)
>>
>> Although I don't get back to MK after work until about 6 PM.
>
> That would mean getting to London about 8 p.m. If you went straight to
> the train station we could meet there then go for something to eat,
> directly. Gaining some (drinking) time. :)
> Of course it's up to you.
Hmm. I shall debate this matter for a time, and let you know when I
reach a conclusion...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:18:13 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>> Sounds good to me... ;-)
>>>
>>> Although I don't get back to MK after work until about 6 PM.
>>
>> That would mean getting to London about 8 p.m. If you went straight to
>> the train station we could meet there then go for something to eat,
>> directly. Gaining some (drinking) time. :)
>> Of course it's up to you.
>
>Hmm. I shall debate this matter for a time, and let you know when I
>reach a conclusion...
Righty ho!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter wrote:
> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>
>> I really need to stop driving 2 hours to see my stylist but I can't
>> find any programmers around here who will look at me and say "No way,
>> sweetie, that hair style will not work on you." until after I already
>> look silly.
>
> Way sweetie, it works.
Yeah, see, I cut it again. Which reminds me, I don't think I emailed you
the pic from NYC. Want me to send that your way once I find my camera?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>
>> I really need to stop driving 2 hours to see my stylist but I can't
>> find any programmers around here who will look at me and say "No way,
>> sweetie, that hair style will not work on you." until after I already
>> look silly.
>
> Can you clarify where "here" is?
>
The email domain doesn't give it away? Blacksburg Va USA Earth Sol
Western Spiral Arm of the Milkyway.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:19:15 +0200, "scott" <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:
>
>>> The aperture on a camera is a hole or an opening through which light
>>> is admitted. Besides letting in more or less light it controls the
>>> depth of field. A small aperture gives a greater depth of field. It is
>>> also referred to as the f number or stops. I assume that Sabrina meant
>>> for you to decrease the aperture to cut down the total light entering
>> I'd say open up the aperture actually, to blur the background and make
>> Andrew stand out more. Increase the shutter speed to compensate for the
>> increased aperture, then increase it further until the background is a bit
>> darker. Then use some flash to make Andrew appear at a satisfactory
>> brightness.
>>
> Probably better, I wish Sabrina had said step up or down. There are a
> few ways of doing what's wanted but the best is to bracket the normal
> exposure IMHO.
I was thinking to close the aperture a bit. That bright of a day, I
didn't think that opening the aperture would leave any room at the flash
sync to get any light without seeing the shutter. Guess with that bright
of a pic with that much in focus it has to be a pretty small aperture
already, but I wasn't going that far with my thoughts yet.
I just graduated from a camera with a max sync speed of 1/64, I'm still
not used to digital cameras going up to 1/4000.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Can you clarify where "here" is?
>>
>
> The email domain doesn't give it away?
That's a domain? It doesn't even appear to parse...
> Blacksburg Va USA Earth Sol
> Western Spiral Arm of the Milkyway.
West of *what*?! o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:17:34 -0400, Sabrina Kilian <"ykgp at
vtSPAM.edu"> wrote:
>
>I was thinking to close the aperture a bit.
I thought the same as you but Scott's view is just as valid IMO.
But why listen to me when yesterday I made the most basic mistake in
the book. I was going to the library when I saw a young woman taking
her pet iguana for a walk. You see some strange sights in London but
I've never seen an iguana on a leash walking down the pavement. So I
grabbed my phone and took a picture. I was shooting into the sun
(mistake #1) so I could not see the screen and shot it blind. When I
looked at the picture I had a lovely shot of my finger. <garn> That's
why I preferred darkroom work to actually taking pictures. :(
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> Jim Charter wrote:
>
>> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>>
>>> I really need to stop driving 2 hours to see my stylist but I can't
>>> find any programmers around here who will look at me and say "No way,
>>> sweetie, that hair style will not work on you." until after I already
>>> look silly.
>>
>>
>> Way sweetie, it works.
>
>
> Yeah, see, I cut it again. Which reminds me, I don't think I emailed you
> the pic from NYC. Want me to send that your way once I find my camera?
Once you find your camera??????
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> Yeah, see, I cut it again.
I have a hard time picturing your hair any other way. For me it
communicated your personality pretty well. Smart, youthful, edgy.
Which reminds me, I don't think I emailed you
> the pic from NYC. Want me to send that your way
Would like that, yes. Can't believe my camera was out of juice that
day. Actually I think my brain was out of juice too.
PS Y'know what? Now I think my new laptop has that virus thingy you
helped me with. :( Know anything about reinstalling Vista?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:58:45 -0400, Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msncom>
wrote:
>Know anything about reinstalling Vista?
Yes reinstall it as XP :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter wrote:
> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>> Jim Charter wrote:
>>
>>> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>>>
>>>> I really need to stop driving 2 hours to see my stylist but I can't
>>>> find any programmers around here who will look at me and say "No
>>>> way, sweetie, that hair style will not work on you." until after I
>>>> already look silly.
>>>
>>>
>>> Way sweetie, it works.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, see, I cut it again. Which reminds me, I don't think I emailed
>> you the pic from NYC. Want me to send that your way once I find my
>> camera?
> Once you find your camera??????
The USB cable went missing, and I haven't needed a CF card reader for
ages. All of the lens and bags got shuffled for the train, then for the
drive from the station back home.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> Jim Charter wrote:
>
>> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Charter wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I really need to stop driving 2 hours to see my stylist but I can't
>>>>> find any programmers around here who will look at me and say "No
>>>>> way, sweetie, that hair style will not work on you." until after I
>>>>> already look silly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Way sweetie, it works.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, see, I cut it again. Which reminds me, I don't think I emailed
>>> you the pic from NYC. Want me to send that your way once I find my
>>> camera?
>>
>> Once you find your camera??????
>
>
> The USB cable went missing, and I haven't needed a CF card reader for
> ages. All of the lens and bags got shuffled for the train, then for the
> drive from the station back home.
That sucks. Kinkos or equivalent?
Note to self: "don't loose the USB"...which would be very easy in my
apartment,...with the cat that steals things...where is the cat,
anyway... ... ...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter wrote:
> Note to self: "don't loose the USB"
Yeah. The funky thing is when the camera has USB, but a non-standard
connector at the camera end, so you can't just replace the cable with
one from Radio Shack. The b______ds. :-)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Helpful housekeeping hints:
Check your feather pillows for holes
before putting them in the washing machine.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
