 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Darren New wrote:
> Actually, I've never seen anyone get the answer write to "why are
> manholes round." I almost hope they ask me that at my next job
> interview, because the interviewer probably doesn't know either. ;-)
It's because the subterranean creatures that burrow around make *round*
holes when they surface. Silly.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.digitalartsuk.com
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Slime wrote:
> I learned the answer from an Encyclopedia Brown book when I was a kid.
Really?? What did he think the answer was?
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Darren New" <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote
> Actually, I've never seen anyone get the answer write to "why are
Just hope that they don't ask you to write the answer...
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"somebody" <x### [at] y com> wrote in message news:484b2fcb@news.povray.org...
> "Darren New" <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote
> > Actually, I've never seen anyone get the answer write to "why are
> Just hope that they don't ask you to write the answer...
Which, by the way, is of course "because the covers are round".
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
somebody wrote:
>> Just hope that they don't ask you to write the answer...
Yes. Blame the tequila. (I knew someone would bring that up. :-)
> Which, by the way, is of course "because the covers are round".
Nope.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Darren New wrote:
> Actually, I've never seen anyone get the answer write to "why are
> manholes round." I almost hope they ask me that at my next job
> interview, because the interviewer probably doesn't know either. ;-)
I like the fake Feynman answer:
START
Interviewer: Now comes the part of the interview where we ask a question
to test your creative thinking ability. Don't think too hard about it,
just apply everyday common sense, and describe your reasoning process.
Here's the question: Why are manhole covers round?
Feynman: They're not. Some manhole covers are square. It's true that
there are SOME round ones, but I've seen square ones, and rectangular ones.
Interviewer: But just considering the round ones, why are they round?
Feynman: If we are just considering the round ones, then they are round
by definition. That statement is a tautology.
Interviewer: I mean, why are there round ones at all? Is there some
particular value to having round ones?
Feynman: Yes. Round covers are used when the hole they are covering up
is also round. It's simplest to cover a round hole with a round cover.
Interviewer: Can you think of a property of round covers that gives them
an advantage over square ones?
Feynman: We have to look at what is under the cover to answer that
question. The hole below the cover is round because a cylinder is the
strongest shape against the compression of the earth around it. Also,
the term "manhole" implies a passage big enough for a man, and a human
being climbing down a ladder is roughly circular in cross-section. So a
cylindrical pipe is the natural shape for manholes. The covers are
simply the shape needed to cover up a cylinder.
Interviewer: Do you believe there is a safety issue? I mean, couldn't
square covers fall into the hole and hurt someone?
Feynman: Not likely. Square covers are sometimes used on prefabricated
vaults where the access passage is also square. The cover is larger than
the passage, and sits on a ledge that supports it along the entire
perimeter. The covers are usually made of solid metal and are very
heavy. Let's assume a two-foot square opening and a ledge width of 1-1/2
inches. In order to get it to fall in, you would have to lift one side
of the cover, then rotate it 30 degrees so that the cover would clear
the ledge, and then tilt the cover up nearly 45 degrees from horizontal
before the center of gravity would shift enough for it to fall in. Yes,
it's possible, but very unlikely. The people authorized to open manhole
covers could easily be trained to do it safely. Applying common
engineering sense, the shape of a manhole cover is entirely determined
by the shape of the opening it is intended to cover.
Interviewer (troubled): Excuse me a moment; I have to discuss something
with my management team. (Leaves room.)
(Interviewer returns after 10 minutes)
Interviewer: We are going to recommend you for immediate hiring into the
marketing department.
END
Taken from:
http://www.sellsbrothers.com/fun/msiview/#Feynman
I have to strongly agree with one point - why do people keep thinking
they are just round? I've seen *many* square shaped ones.
--
Copywight 1991 Elmer Fudd. All wights wesewved
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> Really?? What did he think the answer was?
Just so they can't fall in.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Darren New wrote:
> Actually, I've never seen anyone get the answer write to "why are
> manholes round." I almost hope they ask me that at my next job
> interview, because the interviewer probably doesn't know either. ;-)
>
You know, I had to check what a "manhole" actually is - and I waited for
some seriously wrong answers from Google, but the first answers actually
covered my actual question.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethis zbxt net invalid
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Darren New wrote:
> Actually, I've never seen anyone get the answer write to "why are
> manholes round." I almost hope they ask me that at my next job
> interview, because the interviewer probably doesn't know either. ;-)
The snarky answer is "because manhole covers around round" is the
punchline of a joke, but does not answer the serious question at hand.
A manhole is *circular* minimize the amount of extra material needed to
make it impossible for the cover to fall into the manhole.
The manhole has a certain radius. The manhole cover has a slightly
higher radius. In every direction, the diameter of the cover is larger
than the diameter of the hole, taken in any direction. This is
accomplished if the cover's radius is even a millimeter larger, although
to allow for wear and the thermal expansion of the hole or contraction
of the cover, a larger difference--no more than a centimeter--is prudent.
With any other shape, the required amount to ensure non-falling-in
behavior is larger. A square, or a pentagon, or any n-gon, is larger
from corner to opposing corner (or most opposing corner for n-gons with
an odd number of vertices) than from side to opposing side (or corner to
opposing side). If the difference is larger than the extra amount added
on to make the cover bigger than the hole, the lid falls in, and so the
extra amount would need to be larger.
Minimizing the extra material is important because manhole covers are
heavy; adding to the radius greatly increases the weight of the cover,
because the weight is proportional to the area times the thickness.
Area is proportional to the square of the radius. As any programmer can
tell you, when faced with an O(n^2) problem that is unavoidable, you
make n as small as you can.
Also, a circular manhole fits in any direction. A polygonal manhole
cover has to be turned to fit, or else be picked up again (these things
are heavy) or the corners will wear (or break) off after a bunch of
near-misses.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
> A manhole is *circular* minimize the amount of extra material needed to
> make it impossible for the cover to fall into the manhole.
Are you sure it's a question of minimizing material and not simply because
it's the *simplest* possible solution for the problem (ie. avoid the cover
to ever fall into the manhole)?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |