POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Good Cookie Server Time
14 Oct 2026 17:49:48 EDT (-0400)
  Good Cookie (Message 1 to 34 of 34)  
From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 07:57:53
Message: <48316b41@news.povray.org>
Hello,

This was going to be a rant about win xp sp3 (don't bother by the way) 
instead i've opted for something a bit more positive after remembering two 
things my dad used to say. Don't complain about something unless you're 
prepared to get involved and make a difference and my favorite .... when 
life gives you lemons make lemonade. In this case a good cookie.

Jim
-----
This is an adaptation of a recipe from Joy of Cooking.

I've just omitted the salt and added the cocoa.

This recipe makes two dozen GOOD cookies.



Ingredients:



½ cup margarine

½ cup sugar

½ cup brown sugar

1 large egg

2 tablespoons vanilla

4 tablespoons cocoa



1 cup + 2 tablespoons sifted flour

½ teaspoon baking soda

½ cup chocolate chips & chunks

½ cup chopped pecans



Method:



In a medium-large mixing bowl soften the margarine. About 45 seconds in the 
microwave on high should do the trick. Add the first six ingredients and use 
a fork to mix until creamy. Five minutes should do it. Add half the flour 
and the baking soda and mix until fully incorporated. Add the remaining 
flour and mix again. Add the chips and chunks mix, then add the pecans and 
mix again.



Before spooning out the cookie mixture preheat oven to 350. Each sheet 
requires ten minutes baking time. A heaping teaspoon of cookie dough for 
each cookie arranged in a four by three grid on a cookie sheet is what you're 
going for. I use a butter knife to help with getting the mixture off the 
spoon. The oven should be ready by the time you're done spooning out the 
mixture. Until you've made a couple of batches it's probably a good idea to 
make the cookies smaller. You can always go back and add to the cookies that 
look smaller than the others, if there's extra dough. After baking allow 
about five minutes cooling time on the cookie sheet before transferring to a 
cooling rack. About ten minutes more cooling time on the rack and they 
should be ready to put in the cookie jar.


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 08:03:06
Message: <48316c7a$1@news.povray.org>
#1: ...there's an SP3 now??

#2: God damnit, and I was hungry *before* I started reading!! >_<

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 08:03:15
Message: <48316c83@news.povray.org>
Jim Holsenback <jho### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> This was going to be a rant about win xp sp3 (don't bother by the way) 

  I'm not sure if "don't bother" meant "don't write about the XP SP3" or
"don't bother installing it".

  As for the latter: Do you have even a choice? If I'm not mistaken, SP3
is simply the collection of all the updates which Windows Update has been
giving to people during the years anyways. The vast majority of XP users
already have SP3 effectively installed even before SP3 was "officially"
published.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 08:19:53
Message: <48317069@news.povray.org>
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message 
news:48316c83@news.povray.org...
> Jim Holsenback <jho### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>> This was going to be a rant about win xp sp3 (don't bother by the way)
>
>  I'm not sure if "don't bother" meant "don't write about the XP SP3" or
> "don't bother installing it".

don't bother installing mostly, but i guess both applies here.

>
>  As for the latter: Do you have even a choice? If I'm not mistaken, SP3
> is simply the collection of all the updates which Windows Update has been
> giving to people during the years anyways. The vast majority of XP users
> already have SP3 effectively installed even before SP3 was "officially"
> published.

i had quit installing monthly over a year ago. more troubles than fixes. I 
thought that sp3 would be more stable (less buggy) I'm aware that sp3 is 
just a collection of patches since sp2. I just thought that issues with 
individual patches whould have been addressed .... obviously not! I better 
stop before this start to sound like a rant!

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 08:22:35
Message: <4831710b$1@news.povray.org>
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message 
news:48316c7a$1@news.povray.org...
> #1: ...there's an SP3 now??

yep .... i liken it to driving a car with a tire that has a thousand 
patches. somethings got to give.

>
> #2: God damnit, and I was hungry *before* I started reading!! >_<

really is a good and simple recipe .... you should give it a try!

>
> -- 
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
> http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 08:29:05
Message: <48317291$1@news.povray.org>
> This is an adaptation of a recipe from Joy of Cooking.
> 
> I've just omitted the salt and added the cocoa.
> 
> This recipe makes two dozen GOOD cookies.

Does it matter if my cups and spoons are a different size to yours?


Post a reply to this message

From: Tom Austin
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 08:30:16
Message: <483172d8$1@news.povray.org>
Jim Holsenback wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This was going to be a rant about win xp sp3 (don't bother by the way) 
> instead i've opted for something a bit more positive after remembering two 
> things my dad used to say. Don't complain about something unless you're 
> prepared to get involved and make a difference and my favorite .... when 
> life gives you lemons make lemonade. In this case a good cookie.
> 

What was the old method....

Only install even numbered service packs ;-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 08:45:09
Message: <48317655@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:

>   As for the latter: Do you have even a choice?

Yeah. It's called "Unix". :-S

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 08:57:30
Message: <48317939@news.povray.org>
Jim Holsenback <jho### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> i had quit installing monthly over a year ago. more troubles than fixes.

  Strange. I haven't noticed anything.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 09:14:24
Message: <48317d30@news.povray.org>
"scott" <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote in message 
news:48317291$1@news.povray.org...
>
> Does it matter if my cups and spoons are a different size to yours?
>

is there such a thing an imperial cup? dunno .... as for table/tea sppons i 
just use spoons from knife and fork drawer not measuring spoons.

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 09:17:10
Message: <48317dd6@news.povray.org>
"Tom Austin" <taustin> wrote in message news:483172d8$1@news.povray.org...
>
> What was the old method....
>
> Only install even numbered service packs ;-)

it appears to be a bit like rolling the dice .... you decide! I was under 
the impression the a sp realease was more stable .... more regression 
testing etc.

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 09:19:00
Message: <48317e44$1@news.povray.org>
Jim Holsenback wrote:

> it appears to be a bit like rolling the dice .... you decide! I was under 
> the impression the a sp realease was more stable .... more regression 
> testing etc.

I mistead that as "more agression testing" - possibly kind of apt, no? ;-)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 09:21:21
Message: <48317ed1@news.povray.org>
"Jim Holsenback" <jho### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message 
news:48317d30@news.povray.org...
> is there such a thing an imperial cup?

haha .... should have googled imperial cup before my reply ..... it comes 
back with a wiki-pedia entry. So I guess my units are imperial cup!

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 09:24:20
Message: <48317f84$1@news.povray.org>
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message 
news:48317e44$1@news.povray.org...
> I mistead that as "more agression testing" - possibly kind of apt, no? ;-)

perhaps my terminology is incorrect ..... my point was testing interaction 
with exsisting software
!

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 09:28:33
Message: <48318081$1@news.povray.org>
Jim Holsenback wrote:

> haha .... should have googled imperial cup before my reply ..... it comes 
> back with a wiki-pedia entry. So I guess my units are imperial cup!

True story:

My mum bought one of those bread maker machines. (Why?) You know the 
kind - you dump some flour and water and stuff into it, press a button 
like it's a washing machine, and a few hours later it has delicious 
fresh bread inside it.

Except when my mum first tried to work it for herself, all it produced 
was a blackened little biscuit at the bottom. She couldn't figure out 
what on earth the problem could be. So I had to diagnose it. [Obviously 
I'm good with computers, so I'd know all about baking bread. Wait... WTF??]

Anyway, I managed to chizel a few crumbs out of the bottom of this 
machine and taste them. Have you ever tried eating salt grains? That is 
exactly what this tasted like.

"Jesus women, how much salt did you put in this thing?!"

"Half a table spoon like it says."

"No no - half a *tea* spoon!!"

Lord above, half a tablespoon of salt in a lump of dough that fits in 
one hand? No wonder it went wrong - the yeast is dead, and the machine 
blindly baked the inrisen dough to a concrete lump!

Blithering idiot. Even *I* know the difference between a teaspoon and a 
tablespoon - and I wasn't raised 50 years ago when such measures were 
commonplace! o_O

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: St 
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 09:36:45
Message: <4831826d@news.povray.org>
LOL! You gotta love Povers... Cookie recipes now. :)

  Thanks Jim!

   ~Steve~


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 09:38:15
Message: <483182c7$1@news.povray.org>
St. wrote:
> LOL! You gotta love Povers... Cookie recipes now. :)
> 
>   Thanks Jim!

I am lovin' the whole "I just had a really crap day - have a cookie!" 
mentallity here.

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Gail Shaw
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 11:31:38
Message: <48319d5a@news.povray.org>
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:48316c83@news.povray.org...
> Jim Holsenback <jho### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> > This was going to be a rant about win xp sp3 (don't bother by the way)
>
>   I'm not sure if "don't bother" meant "don't write about the XP SP3" or
> "don't bother installing it".
>
>   As for the latter: Do you have even a choice? If I'm not mistaken, SP3
> is simply the collection of all the updates which Windows Update has been
> giving to people during the years anyways. The vast majority of XP users
> already have SP3 effectively installed even before SP3 was "officially"
> published.
>

On my laptop (vista) I go through the patches and updates that are available
and install the ones I think that I need.
If you have update set to automatically download an install, then you've
effectivly made your choice, otherwise, sure you do.


Post a reply to this message

From: Gail Shaw
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 11:33:33
Message: <48319dcd@news.povray.org>
"Tom Austin" <taustin> wrote in message news:483172d8$1@news.povray.org...

>
> What was the old method....
>
> Only install even numbered service packs ;-)

Dunno. On SQL Server, SP2 was the problematic one. Previous version of SQL,
it was sp3 that had 'issues'
I've heard that advice applied to application versions as well, just for odd
numbers


Post a reply to this message

From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 12:02:42
Message: <op.uber6snac3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Mon, 19 May 2008 12:57:56 +0100, Jim Holsenback  
<jho### [at] hotmailcom> did spake, saying:

> This recipe makes two dozen GOOD cookies.

But I wanted EVIL cookies :-P

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 13:00:22
Message: <4831b226@news.povray.org>
"Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote in message 
news:op.uber6snac3xi7v@news.povray.org...
> And lo on Mon, 19 May 2008 12:57:56 +0100, Jim Holsenback 
> <jho### [at] hotmailcom> did spake, saying:
>
>> This recipe makes two dozen GOOD cookies.
>
> But I wanted EVIL cookies :-P

add a sprinkle of hemlock? ;-)


Post a reply to this message

From: andrel
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 21:58:19
Message: <48323066.1020503@hotmail.com>
Jim Holsenback wrote:
> "Jim Holsenback" <jho### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message 
> news:48317d30@news.povray.org...
>> is there such a thing an imperial cup?
> 
> haha .... should have googled imperial cup before my reply ..... it comes 
> back with a wiki-pedia entry. So I guess my units are imperial cup!
> 
Ok, so the japanese have the smallest cup size. That makes sense. But 
why is the US cup size smaller than in the UK?


Post a reply to this message

From: andrel
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 19 May 2008 22:01:28
Message: <48323124.8070700@hotmail.com>
Invisible wrote:
> Jim Holsenback wrote:
> 
>> haha .... should have googled imperial cup before my reply ..... it 
>> comes back with a wiki-pedia entry. So I guess my units are imperial cup!
> 
> True story:
> 
> My mum bought one of those bread maker machines. (Why?) You know the 
> kind - you dump some flour and water and stuff into it, press a button 
> like it's a washing machine, and a few hours later it has delicious 
> fresh bread inside it.
> 
> Except when my mum first tried to work it for herself, all it produced 
> was a blackened little biscuit at the bottom. She couldn't figure out 
> what on earth the problem could be. So I had to diagnose it. [Obviously 
> I'm good with computers, so I'd know all about baking bread. Wait... WTF??]
> 
Because like in every modern machine there is a microprocessor inside. 
Obviously there was a bug in the program.


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 20 May 2008 02:41:19
Message: <ojs434d8aqj5vnnn6e21ppfj0hrsicl3dh@4ax.com>
On Tue, 20 May 2008 03:59:02 +0200, andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom>
wrote:

>> 
>Ok, so the japanese have the smallest cup size. That makes sense. But 
>why is the US cup size smaller than in the UK?

It could be because America has 16 fluid ounces to a pint whereas in
the UK there are 20 fluid ounces to a pint.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 20 May 2008 04:08:15
Message: <483286ef@news.povray.org>
andrel wrote:

> Because like in every modern machine there is a microprocessor inside. 
> Obviously there was a bug in the program.

Actually, it turns out it was a wetware error...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 20 May 2008 04:26:55
Message: <op.ubf1q0m4c3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Mon, 19 May 2008 18:00:25 +0100, Jim Holsenback  
<jho### [at] hotmailcom> did spake, saying:

>
> "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote in message
> news:op.uber6snac3xi7v@news.povray.org...
>> And lo on Mon, 19 May 2008 12:57:56 +0100, Jim Holsenback
>> <jho### [at] hotmailcom> did spake, saying:
>>
>>> This recipe makes two dozen GOOD cookies.
>>
>> But I wanted EVIL cookies :-P
>
> add a sprinkle of hemlock? ;-)

I'll just strap some lasers to them... I know I know I'm sorry way too  
overused.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 20 May 2008 12:37:23
Message: <4832fe43@news.povray.org>
andrel wrote:
> Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> "Jim Holsenback" <jho### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
>> news:48317d30@news.povray.org...
>>> is there such a thing an imperial cup?
>> 
>> haha .... should have googled imperial cup before my reply ..... it comes
>> back with a wiki-pedia entry. So I guess my units are imperial cup!
>> 
> Ok, so the japanese have the smallest cup size. That makes sense. But
> why is the US cup size smaller than in the UK?

What cup size are we talking about here? :)


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 21 May 2008 14:27:04
Message: <48346978$1@news.povray.org>
Invisible wrote:
> Actually, it turns out it was a wetware error...

A POBCAK problem.  (Problem Occurs Between Chair And Keyboard)

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 21 May 2008 14:28:08
Message: <483469b8$1@news.povray.org>
Tom Austin wrote:
> Only install even numbered service packs ;-)

I thought that was "Only watch even-numbered Star Trek movies"?

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."


Post a reply to this message

From: Kyle
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 22 May 2008 07:51:14
Message: <efna34ddit9sq0idg6c7eqkbk5clgm76d0@4ax.com>
On Tue, 20 May 2008 09:26:50 +0100, "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk>
wrote:

>I'll just strap some lasers to them... I know I know I'm sorry way too  
>overused.

It may be overused, but it still gets a giggle from me.  :)


Post a reply to this message

From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 22 May 2008 09:23:26
Message: <op.ubj4tbagc3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Thu, 22 May 2008 12:51:13 +0100, Kyle <hob### [at] gatenet> did  
spake, saying:

> On Tue, 20 May 2008 09:26:50 +0100, "Phil Cook"  
> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
>> I'll just strap some lasers to them... I know I know I'm sorry way too
>> overused.
>
> It may be overused, but it still gets a giggle from me.  :)

I just want to bake some cookies.
Evil cookies?
No! Just regular cookies you just do in the oven.
An evil oven?
You always do that.

Would have been my second choice post :-P

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Kyle
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 22 May 2008 11:13:11
Message: <eb3b3455501oacd07ndj56glh1409vjsfm@4ax.com>
On Thu, 22 May 2008 14:23:25 +0100, "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk>
wrote:

>I just want to bake some cookies.
>Evil cookies?
>No! Just regular cookies you just do in the oven.
>An evil oven?
>You always do that.

I hate you! I hate you! I wish I was never artificially created in a lab!


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 22 May 2008 11:21:29
Message: <48358f79@news.povray.org>
>> I just want to bake some cookies.
>> Evil cookies?
>> No! Just regular cookies you just do in the oven.
>> An evil oven?
>> You always do that.
> 
> I hate you! I hate you! I wish I was never artificially created in a lab!

Wait... are you quoting Austin Powers or something?

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Kyle
Subject: Re: Good Cookie
Date: 22 May 2008 11:28:20
Message: <o74b349d76h8hf170210v55aupue8k6gtp@4ax.com>
On Thu, 22 May 2008 16:21:28 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:


>Wait... are you quoting Austin Powers or something?

NO!  I'M FOR REAL!!!  :-P


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.