 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Try making a google search using this as the search string:
Works at least with firefox. Might not work with others (I haven't tested).
Strange that they don't filter those in any way.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Warp wrote:
> Try making a google search using this as the search string:
>
>
...and I thought *I* had too much free time. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Warp" <war### [at] tag povray org> wrote in message
news:4820b515@news.povray.org...
> Try making a google search using this as the search string:
>
>
What?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa dot com> a écrit dans le message de
news: 4820cafa@news.povray.org...
>
> "Warp" <war### [at] tag povray org> wrote in message
> news:4820b515@news.povray.org...
>> Try making a google search using this as the search string:
>>
>>
>
> What?
http://digg.com/programming/COOL_HTML_TRICK_Reverse_words_with_Just_like_that
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Gilles Tran" <gitran_nospam_@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:4820cc4f$1@news.povray.org...
> "Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa dot com> a écrit dans le message de
> > What?
>
>
http://digg.com/programming/COOL_HTML_TRICK_Reverse_words_with_Just_like_tha
t
>
Interesting... It has possibilities.
I'm contemplating seeing if I can reverse part of a forum message thread for
a while.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 06 May 2008 15:44:22 -0400, Warp wrote:
> Try making a google search using this as the search string:
>
>
>
> Works at least with firefox. Might not work with others (I haven't
> tested).
>
> Strange that they don't filter those in any way.
I've always liked searching for stuff like
intitle:"Index of" passwd passwd.bak
The stuff found it just so amusing. http://johnny.ihackstuff.com/ghdb.php
has tons more interesting google searches.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 06 May 2008 23:28:14 +0200, Gail Shaw wrote:
> I'm contemplating seeing if I can reverse part of a forum message thread
> for a while.
It's not hard....
?eeS
miJ
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
news:4820d197$1@news.povray.org...
> On Tue, 06 May 2008 23:28:14 +0200, Gail Shaw wrote:
>
> > I'm contemplating seeing if I can reverse part of a forum message thread
> > for a while.
>
> It's not hard....
>
> ?eeS
Hehe. I mean a web-based forum. Bonus if I can get pieces of text I didn't
write reversed.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Sabrina Kilian" <ykg### [at] SUCKSvt edu> wrote in message
news:4820cded@news.povray.org...
> I've always liked searching for stuff like
>
> intitle:"Index of" passwd passwd.bak
Or this. Interesting results start about half way down page 3
http://www.google.co.za/search?q=inurl:from+inurl:where+inurl:select&hl=en&p
wst=1&start=30&sa=N
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
:etorw praW
:gnirts hcraes eht sa siht gnisu hcraes elgoog a gnikam yrT >
>
;8328#& >
>
.)detset t'nevah I( srehto htiw krow ton thgiM .xoferif htiw tsael ta
skroW >
>
.yaw yna ni esoht retlif t'nod yeht taht egnartS >
>
"" rof hcraes uoy fi sa emas...retcarahc tigel a s'tI ?ton yhW
(.sdnah ym no emit hcum oot yaw evah I)
--
kooC miT
ten.ecapsetiseerf.naerypme//:ptt
-----KCOLB EDOC KEEG NIGEB-----
21.3 :noisreV
$>)+++(++W ---E L ?P U )++++(++C --?a :s -upd AFG
)--(Y )--(EP )+++(+SP ?V )--(-M ?O )+(w -K ?o ++N
ID )+++(++b +vt *R +X +++++>++5 *t )--(-PGP
--y! ---r! +h ++>*e )++G( )---(++D
------KCOLB EDOC KEEG DNE------
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa dot com> wrote in message
news:48213233@news.povray.org...
> Hehe. I mean a web-based forum. Bonus if I can get pieces of text I didn't
> write reversed.
If it helps, I've seen it used in web based forums, and on web based chat as
well :)
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> Strange that they don't filter those in any way.
What if you want to search for some phrase that is a mixture of
left-to-right and right-to-left languages?
BTW, notice how when you try to select text that is a mixture of both it
correctly allows non-continuos selection blocks (eg 2nd half of an english
word and 1st half of the next arabic word results in a selection area that
is split in two).
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 07 May 2008 06:39:20 +0200, Gail Shaw wrote:
> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
> news:4820d197$1@news.povray.org...
>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 23:28:14 +0200, Gail Shaw wrote:
>>
>> > I'm contemplating seeing if I can reverse part of a forum message
>> > thread for a while.
>>
>> It's not hard....
>>
>> ?eeS
>
> Hehe. I mean a web-based forum. Bonus if I can get pieces of text I
> didn't write reversed.
Yeah, that idea just struck me and I had to share. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 07 May 2008 01:11:58 -0400, Tim Cook wrote:
> (.sdnah ym no emit hcum oot yaw evah I)
But you got the parens in the wrong order. Should have been:
).sdnah ym no emit hcum oot yaw evah I(
;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 07 May 2008 13:05:38 +0200, scott wrote:
>> Strange that they don't filter those in any way.
>
> What if you want to search for some phrase that is a mixture of
> left-to-right and right-to-left languages?
>
> BTW, notice how when you try to select text that is a mixture of both it
> correctly allows non-continuos selection blocks (eg 2nd half of an
> english word and 1st half of the next arabic word results in a selection
> area that is split in two).
The other interesting thing I noticed was that the page title also
reversed.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 07 May 2008 01:11:58 -0400, Tim Cook wrote:
>
>> (.sdnah ym no emit hcum oot yaw evah I)
>
> But you got the parens in the wrong order. Should have been:
>
> ).sdnah ym no emit hcum oot yaw evah I(
>
> ;-)
>
> Jim
Arg, those slipped through.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.digitalartsuk.com
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Wed, 07 May 2008 15:04:27 -0400, Tim Cook wrote:
> Arg, those slipped through.
It happens. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 07 May 2008 01:11:58 -0400, Tim Cook wrote:
>
>> (.sdnah ym no emit hcum oot yaw evah I)
>
> But you got the parens in the wrong order. Should have been:
>
> ).sdnah ym no emit hcum oot yaw evah I(
>
> ;-)
>
> Jim
Believe it or not, when I ran this statement through google - it came back
(I have way too much time on my hands.)
copy/paste
Ok, so by pasting this stupid string I just messed up thunderbird
<sigh>
LAter... Tom
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Tom Austin a écrit :
>
> Believe it or not, when I ran this statement through google - it came back
> (I have way too much time on my hands.)
>
> copy/paste
>
> Ok, so by pasting this stupid string I just messed up thunderbird
> <sigh>
>
>
> LAter... Tom
Interestingly it seems that the web view is not affected... Since you're
the first to actually post the dreaded char ;-)
I'm still not quite getting the behaviour of arrows and end/home keys in
this mode. Should just go to sleep, I suppose :-)
--
Vincent
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Vincent Le Chevalier wrote:
> Tom Austin a écrit :
>>
>> Believe it or not, when I ran this statement through google - it came
>> back
>> (I have way too much time on my hands.)
> >
>> copy/paste
>>
>> Ok, so by pasting this stupid string I just messed up thunderbird
>> <sigh>
>>
>>
>> LAter... Tom
>
> Interestingly it seems that the web view is not affected... Since you're
> the first to actually post the dreaded char ;-)
>
> I'm still not quite getting the behaviour of arrows and end/home keys in
> this mode. Should just go to sleep, I suppose :-)
>
Seeing this is funny - what got reversed and what did not get reversed....
When I wrote the message everything after the 'reversed' phrase was
reversed. - including my commend that thunderbird was messed up.
But in your quoted reply, only the paste from google is still reversed
and the rest straightened out...
go figure...
Tom
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Tom Austin a écrit :
> Vincent Le Chevalier wrote:
>> Tom Austin a écrit :
>>>
>>> Believe it or not, when I ran this statement through google - it came
>>> back
>>> (I have way too much time on my hands.)
>> >
>>> copy/paste
>>>
>>> Ok, so by pasting this stupid string I just messed up thunderbird
>>> <sigh>
>>>
>>>
>>> LAter... Tom
>>
>> Interestingly it seems that the web view is not affected... Since
>> you're the first to actually post the dreaded char ;-)
>>
>> I'm still not quite getting the behaviour of arrows and end/home keys
>> in this mode. Should just go to sleep, I suppose :-)
>>
>
> Seeing this is funny - what got reversed and what did not get reversed....
> When I wrote the message everything after the 'reversed' phrase was
> reversed. - including my commend that thunderbird was messed up.
>
> But in your quoted reply, only the paste from google is still reversed
> and the rest straightened out...
>
> go figure...
>
Ah no, this is normal, because I pasted the opposite character (whose
code I don't remember right now) just before your comment, to try it out
as well :-)
Thinking about it maybe if one posted in ISO-8859-1 the web view would
be affected as well.
--
Vincent
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |