 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Distortion of meaning? - contains one use of moderate language
Date: 2 May 2008 12:26:30
Message: <481b40b6$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 02 May 2008 16:40:08 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>
>> Phil Cook wrote:
>>
>>> I've seen this film, I know I've seen this film; so why is it I can't
>>> remember a single thing about it other the fact I've seen it?
>> ...because it's diabolically shallow and pointless? (Not to mention
>> laughably implausible.)
>
> Well, if there are crevasses, then there are bound to be points
> somewhere. ;-)
>
> Jim
No. There are no points. Not even a peak. I'm a survivor of this movie,
and let me tell you, I walked away from it with a little bit less of my
soul than I had when I watched it. It was truly a soul-sucking
experience. The movie was breathtakingly boring, with no suspension of
disbelief at all.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Distortion of meaning? - contains one use of moderate language
Date: 2 May 2008 12:55:13
Message: <481b4771$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> The movie was breathtakingly boring, with no suspension of
> disbelief at all.
Yet people in the US Congress actually based policy on it. You really
gotta wonder sometimes.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Distortion of meaning? - contains one use of moderate language
Date: 2 May 2008 14:00:34
Message: <481b56c2$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 02 May 2008 11:20:05 -0500, Mike Raiford wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 02 May 2008 16:40:08 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>
>>> Phil Cook wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've seen this film, I know I've seen this film; so why is it I can't
>>>> remember a single thing about it other the fact I've seen it?
>>> ...because it's diabolically shallow and pointless? (Not to mention
>>> laughably implausible.)
>>
>> Well, if there are crevasses, then there are bound to be points
>> somewhere. ;-)
>>
>> Jim
>
> No. There are no points. Not even a peak. I'm a survivor of this movie,
> and let me tell you, I walked away from it with a little bit less of my
> soul than I had when I watched it. It was truly a soul-sucking
> experience. The movie was breathtakingly boring, with no suspension of
> disbelief at all.
Surely the crevasse in question wasn't completely smooth? ;-)
(I haven't seen the movie)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Distortion of meaning? - contains one use of moderate language
Date: 2 May 2008 14:19:55
Message: <481b5b4b$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> The movie was breathtakingly boring, with no suspension of disbelief
>> at all.
>
> Yet people in the US Congress actually based policy on it. You really
> gotta wonder sometimes.
....I am now officially scared.
._.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Distortion of meaning? - contains one use of moderate language
Date: 2 May 2008 14:22:03
Message: <481b5bcb@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Language: none
>
> Ice Age was a silent movie?
Indeed. At least, the trailer was.
You actually have to admire the amount of life and energy they put into
that damned squirrel!
BTW, for some reason I find foreign language dubbings of movies to be
really quite amusing. Maybe because of the low quality of the people
hired to do this work? IDK. The other day I was listening to the Italian
version of the famous prologue to the War of the Worlds. Very funny!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
