 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
...running WinAmp for over 2 hours decoding Ogg Vorbis in realtime, and
seeing that it used a total of 4 seconds of CPU time.
(That's one impressive inverse MDCT!)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> ...running WinAmp for over 2 hours decoding Ogg Vorbis in realtime, and
> seeing that it used a total of 4 seconds of CPU time.
>
> (That's one impressive inverse MDCT!)
>
!
That's pretty cool :) Too bad we can't have POV ray trace in real time,
using <10% CPU time!
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> That's pretty cool :) Too bad we can't have POV ray trace in real time,
> using <10% CPU time!
Well, when somebody comes up with the equivilent of the Fast Fourier
Transform, maybe... ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers escribió:
> That's pretty cool :) Too bad we can't have POV ray trace in real time,
> using <10% CPU time!
If we could, we would increase the detail on the scene to reach 100%
again :) YKYHBRTTLW...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmail isthebestcom> wrote:
> YKYHBRTTLW...
YKYHBRTTLWYKWYKYHBRTTLWM :)
....Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers escribió:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> YKYHBRTTLW...
>
> YKYHBRTTLWYKWYKYHBRTTLWM :)
You Know You Have Been RayTracing Too Long
When You Know When You Know (?) You Have
Been RayTracing Too Long W... M...
Err... Explain?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Chambers escribió:
>> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> YKYHBRTTLW...
>>
>> YKYHBRTTLWYKWYKYHBRTTLWM :)
>
> You Know You Have Been RayTracing Too Long
> When You Know When You Know (?) You Have
> Been RayTracing Too Long W... M...
>
> Err... Explain?
You haven't been raytracing long enough.
You know you have been ray tracing too long when you know what 'you know
you have been ray tracing too long when' means.
All the acronyms has me wondering, has p.o-t ever had a TTSNBN?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> Err... Explain?
>
> You haven't been raytracing long enough.
>
> You know you have been ray tracing too long when you know what 'you know
> you have been ray tracing too long when' means.
Good job :)
> All the acronyms has me wondering, has p.o-t ever had a TTSNBN?
What's that?
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> Err... Explain?
>>
>> You haven't been raytracing long enough.
>>
>> You know you have been ray tracing too long when you know what 'you
>> know you have been ray tracing too long when' means.
>
> Good job :)
>
>> All the acronyms has me wondering, has p.o-t ever had a TTSNBN?
>
> What's that?
>
Thread That Shall Not Be Named
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian <"ykgp at vtSPAM.edu"> wrote:
> Chambers wrote:
> > Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> >> All the acronyms has me wondering, has p.o-t ever had a TTSNBN?
> >
> > What's that?
> >
>
> Thread That Shall Not Be Named
I heard about one on Adam and Eve (I wasn't around for it, but people were
referencing it for months after).
I haven't seen Bill DeWitt in here for a while. He used to like getting people
riled up. (For that matter, I don't think I've seen Ken post in here for a few
years. Whatever happened to our favorite AI?)
....Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian <"ykgp at vtSPAM.edu"> wrote:
> All the acronyms has me wondering, has p.o-t ever had a TTSNBN?
Would it break the rules if someone told you? Or maybe the very act of
mentioning it would change its status. Whoa. I need to sit down.
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> I haven't seen Bill DeWitt in here for a while. He used to like getting people
> riled up. (For that matter, I don't think I've seen Ken post in here for a few
> years. Whatever happened to our favorite AI?)
BDW==AQ?Yes:No
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:01:30 -0500, Mike Raiford
<mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>Chambers wrote:
>
>> I haven't seen Bill DeWitt in here for a while. He used to like getting people
>> riled up. (For that matter, I don't think I've seen Ken post in here for a few
>> years. Whatever happened to our favorite AI?)
>
>BDW==AQ?Yes:No
I can't remember BdW posting images. Did he ever?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
triple_r wrote:
> Sabrina Kilian <"ykgp at vtSPAM.edu"> wrote:
>> All the acronyms has me wondering, has p.o-t ever had a TTSNBN?
>
> Would it break the rules if someone told you? Or maybe the very act of
> mentioning it would change its status. Whoa. I need to sit down.
>
> - Ricky
>
That's why I specifically did not ask for the name of said thread.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:01:30 -0500, Mike Raiford
> <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>
>> Chambers wrote:
>>
>>> I haven't seen Bill DeWitt in here for a while. He used to like getting people
>>> riled up. (For that matter, I don't think I've seen Ken post in here for a few
>>> years. Whatever happened to our favorite AI?)
>> BDW==AQ?Yes:No
>
> I can't remember BdW posting images. Did he ever?
Hmm. Don't think he did, but then again, he was before my time, a bit.
Though I remember one troll a few years back basically posting
pornographic images. First time ever a user was basically "banned" from
the servers..
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:52:42 -0500, Mike Raiford
<mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>> I can't remember BdW posting images. Did he ever?
>
>Hmm. Don't think he did, but then again, he was before my time, a bit.
>Though I remember one troll a few years back basically posting
>pornographic images. First time ever a user was basically "banned" from
>the servers..
I remember him and there was some talk, at the time, about someone
else who had been banned for far, far right views and trolling. But
Bill left voluntarily after showing increasing signs of paranoia.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:52:42 +0100, Mike Raiford
<mra### [at] hotmailcom> did spake, saying:
> Though I remember one troll a few years back basically posting
> pornographic images. First time ever a user was basically "banned" from
> the servers..
Oh wasn't he the one who insisted he had a right to post his images here
and did so in JPEG2000 format, and then got ratty when someone reposted
them in standard JPG?
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
>
> Oh wasn't he the one who insisted he had a right to post his images here
> and did so in JPEG2000 format, and then got ratty when someone reposted
> them in standard JPG?
>
That's the one. Boy! Was he fun!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
