Eero Ahonen wrote:
> 
> Possibly (I already have a netbooting NetBSD for MicroSPARC (SS5)), but 
> OpenBSD would be the nerdiest overkill for the job of garmaugh (the 
> Netra) :).

Looks like I might be more tempted to look after OpenBSD.

[   12.741076] Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver
[   12.800823] ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; 
override with idebus=xx
[   12.909583] mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
[   12.978231] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[   13.052840] drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c: v2.6:USB HID core driver
[   13.138639] TCP bic registered
[   13.176875] NET: Registered protocol family 1
[   13.232926] NET: Registered protocol family 17
[   13.293318] RPC: Registered udp transport module.
[   13.356853] RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
[   13.921983] IP-Config: Failed to open eth0
[   13.972889] IP-Config: Failed to open eth1
[   15.032961] Sending DHCP requests ...... timed out!
[   97.102510] IP-Config: Retrying forever (NFS root)...

Yep, 2.6.25.

-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
    http://www.zbxt.net
       aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid

Post a reply to this message

Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> Warp wrote:
>>> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>>>> You're not the only person I'm responding to here.
>>>   Who else claimed you were bashing Solaris?
> 
>> Ah. So you *are* claiming I was bashing Solaris.
> 
>   No. Now you are nitpicking about semantics.

And you aren't?

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message

Darren New wrote:
> Warp wrote:
>> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>>> Warp wrote:
>>>> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>>>>> You're not the only person I'm responding to here.
>>>>   Who else claimed you were bashing Solaris?
>>
>>> Ah. So you *are* claiming I was bashing Solaris.
>>
>>   No. Now you are nitpicking about semantics.
> 
> And you aren't?
> 

You two were made for each other :)

-- 
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:45:25 -0700, Chambers wrote:

> You two were made for each other :)

I'm glad someone said it, and that it wasn't me who did. ;-)

(I might've thought it, though - does make for entertaining reading <g> - 
no offense, guys)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> >> Warp wrote:
> >>> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> >>>> You're not the only person I'm responding to here.
> >>>   Who else claimed you were bashing Solaris?
> > 
> >> Ah. So you *are* claiming I was bashing Solaris.
> > 
> >   No. Now you are nitpicking about semantics.

> And you aren't?

  No. I just said that your original sentence could be easily interpreted
as if you were bashing Solaris, and if you are even aware of that. (And
then, humorously, I suggested that you are actually doing it on purpose.)

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message