 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> In fact, here's a screen of our viewers. I'm amazed some are still on w95!!
> Gulp!
Wait, WTF? Amiga??? What are they running, IBrowse?!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> 1. If *my* blog is linked from anywhere, I'll be seriously amazed!
>
> 2. If my blog contains any *useful* info, I'll be ultra-amazed.
>
> In fact, you know what? I challenge you to find a Google search term
> that finds my blog. :-P
I wasn't talking about *your* blog :) I have no idea why somebody would
browse your blog from lynx...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> I wasn't talking about *your* blog :) I have no idea why somebody would
> browse your blog from lynx...
Well, that's the part that was really *really* puzzling me... ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
4807b158$1@news.povray.org...
> In fact, you know what? I challenge you to find a Google search term that
> finds my blog. :-P
You're the top one for this, silly boy :D
http://www.google.com/search?q=secumbing+eventualy
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> Yeah, but aren't they all just implementations of the POSIX standard
> which basically defines exactly how everything has to work anyway?
Posix defines some minimum requirements, it doesn't say what else the
OS may also implement.
Also, I don't think the posix standard says much about how the kernel
should internally be implemented (only about some of its interfaces).
> Interesting. I thought that Solaris only works on Sun hardware. [And,
> either way, that it's quite expensive].
Yes, I know you don't read current events on almost anything. Solaris
has worked on Intel hardware for quite some time, and Sun made it open
source also some time ago. Apparently they have gone to great lengths
to implement robust support for PC hardware. Some people even claim it's
better than linux in some aspects.
> > Believe it or not, sometimes people must access the WWW without a
> > fancy graphical user interface, eg. from a text terminal.
> Interesting... You would think that's a pretty rare requirement.
The computing world consists of more than just desktop PCs. Those
mythical big servers out there somewhere don't run by themselves, and
they don't all have fancy graphical user interfaces (many of them don't
have a graphics card at all).
Of course there are also a few purist unix gurus out there in their
caves who think that late 70's is the only real computer era and that
current computers are just toys for kids.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
How do I print an image in Wndows? I am told in linux there is a program called
convert. How can one do this in Windows?
Thanks
Vrunda
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> St. wrote:
> > In fact, here's a screen of our viewers. I'm amazed some are still on w95!!
> > Gulp!
>
> Wait, WTF? Amiga??? What are they running, IBrowse?!
>
> --
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
> http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
>
> Why would anyone want to run linux on an UltraSPARC? AFAIK linux still
> doesn't get even close to Solaris in scalability...
>
Because of the usability and configurability (I'm not doing anything BIG
with a Netra X1, more like something very small;). And most of all my
laziness: because I already have working configurations etc for Linux
for the stuff the machine will be doing. It'll just replace my ancient
P200MMX -box, which is getting unstable (3 crashes in 2 years) and which
has a HD that's keeping a hey-I-think-I'd-need-to-break-down -noise (and
yes, the Sparc will be diskless installation).
If it wasn't Linux, it'd still most probably be OpenBSD, not Solaris.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> In fact, here's a screen of our viewers. I'm amazed some are still on w95!!
> Gulp!
These are some of the coolest httpd requests I get:
xxx.xx.x.xx - - [05/Apr/2008:01:48:54 +0000] "GET /pics/th_screws.jpg HTTP/1.1" 200
1709 "http://warp.povusers.org/pics/" "Mozilla/4.0 (PSP (PlayStation Portable); 2.00)"
290 2004
(There's a total of 1267 requests with that architecture.)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
math_prof <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> How do I print an image in Wndows?
alt+printscreen copies the current window to the clipboard. Then just
launch your favorite image manipulation program and past (or "acquire
from clipboard", or whatever).
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> In fact, you know what? I challenge you to find a Google search term that
>> finds my blog. :-P
>
> You're the top one for this, silly boy :D
> http://www.google.com/search?q=secumbing+eventualy
O_O
My God... I didn't realise my total inability to spell words correctly
was this unique on the Internet... [or that Google has trawled my blog
in the last few days...]
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
