 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If you have a website, and you're using CSS, *remove it* today!
http://naked.dustindiaz.com/
"The idea behind this event is to promote Web Standards. Plain and
simple. This includes proper use of (x)html, semantic markup, a good
hierarchy structure, and of course, a good 'ol play on words. It's time
to show off your <body>."
"On April 9th, simply remove all CSS from your website, stripping it
entirely of its design."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmail isthebestcom> wrote:
> "The idea behind this event is to promote Web Standards. Plain and
> simple. This includes proper use of (x)html, semantic markup, a good
> hierarchy structure, and of course, a good 'ol play on words. It's time
> to show off your <body>."
I fail to understand how removing CSS promotes web standards.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp escribió:
> I fail to understand how removing CSS promotes web standards.
Those with table layouts and <font> won't notice the difference removing
whatever little CSS they have.
If your site is *impossible* to navigate if CSS is turned off (or if
navigating with lynx ;) ), shows you're doing it wrong.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:
>> "The idea behind this event is to promote Web Standards. Plain and
>> simple. This includes proper use of (x)html, semantic markup, a good
>> hierarchy structure, and of course, a good 'ol play on words. It's time
>> to show off your <body>."
>
> I fail to understand how removing CSS promotes web standards.
In theory, you should be able to replace someone else's CSS with your
own and still be able to use the site. E.g., for printing, screen
reading, etc. If your site breaks horribly when you take out the CSS,
it's like a document that becomes unreadable if it's all in the same font.
(Which I guess some math textbooks would fall under...) :-)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Woah... I was thinking about CounterStrike: Source, the FPS computer
game. And, uh, naked would be... a whole new world of uglyness!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nicolas Alvarez" <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote
> If you have a website, and you're using CSS, *remove it* today!
Sorry, but today I'm celebrating the fifth annual ignore all silly days day.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
somebody wrote:
> Sorry, but today I'm celebrating the fifth annual ignore all silly days day.
31337!
In this Internet age, silly little insider jokes seem to somehow
magically transform into global phenominons. I think we need a little
more sanity in this world. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <47fcee3f$1@news.povray.org>,
nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom says...
> If you have a website, and you're using CSS, *remove it* today!
>
> http://naked.dustindiaz.com/
>
> "The idea behind this event is to promote Web Standards. Plain and
> simple. This includes proper use of (x)html, semantic markup, a good
> hierarchy structure, and of course, a good 'ol play on words. It's time
> to show off your <body>."
>
> "On April 9th, simply remove all CSS from your website, stripping it
> entirely of its design."
>
Bah. I am more interesting in, "National Nude Day", but sadly Congress
doesn't seem to know it exists or won't pass legislation for it. ;) lol
--
void main () {
if version = "Vista" {
call slow_by_half();
call DRM_everything();
}
call functional_code();
}
else
call crash_windows();
}
<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Bah. I am more interesting in, "National Nude Day", but sadly Congress
> doesn't seem to know it exists or won't pass legislation for it. ;) lol
Don't be absurd. The *only* people willing to get naked in public are
the ones you make you feel ill every time you look at them. EEEWWW!! >_<
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:33:02 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>Don't be absurd. The *only* people willing to get naked in public are
>the ones you make you feel ill every time you look at them. EEEWWW!! >_<
This is true :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
