 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> Gilles Tran wrote:
>> "Invisible" <voi### [at] dev null> a écrit dans le message de news:
>>> number..." is really easy to sum up in a couple of drawings.
>>
>> Of course it is.
>>
>> G.
>
> Is it good or bad that I'm actually enjoying your comics?
>
In the interest of perserving the history of P.O-T, I've collected the
comics posted here into a single web page, located at
http://www.pacificwebguy.com/news.php?readmore=44
:)
(PS If either of the authors ask me to remove these works, I'd willingly
comply, though I think they're worth sharing).
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> I was thinking more about girls casually telling people they're crampy -
> but hey, that too! ;-)
It's a comfort level thing. If they mention it to you, it's usually
because you're *very* good friends (and I don't necessarily mean
romantically).
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Eero Ahonen escribió:
>> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> OK, so #1: I finished reading the entire archive now. Woah, am I an
>>> official addict now or what? :-S
>>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot, I'm going on #135 now... :P
>
> He got me reading it too <.<
>
> And I wasn't even done reading UserFriendly archive.
>
> And I have other stuff to do.
I'm still working on the CAD archive!
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I was thinking more about girls casually telling people they're crampy
>> - but hey, that too! ;-)
>
> It's a comfort level thing. If they mention it to you, it's usually
> because you're *very* good friends (and I don't necessarily mean
> romantically).
That explains Faye and Martin then...
I've never lived with a girl, but... is it really true they become
psychotic once a month? Or is that a myth?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> I'm still working on the CAD archive!
Trust me, it's worth it.
Except... hmm... currently Tim is doing some random arc unrelated to
anything else, which I'm not enjoying very much. Pitty.
I think web comics just inherantly seem better when you're reading the
archives. You can quickly skip over the dull strips, and spend more time
looking at the awesome ones. Once you get to having to actually wait
each day for the next strip, it usually ends up being... an anticlimax.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> In the interest of perserving the history of P.O-T, I've collected the
> comics posted here into a single web page, located at
> http://www.pacificwebguy.com/news.php?readmore=44
>
> :)
My God... I have my own web comic - and without lifting a finger! LAMO!!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> Ever heard of Poser?
>> I was under the impression that that is (A) commercial and (B)
>> spine-tinglingly expensive.
>
> You can get it for 120£ and some earlier versions for 50£.
> There's also DAZ Studio, which is free.
I don't know if I should be saying this out loud, but I'd much rather be
talented enough to actually draw things with pencil and paper...
>> (Also, I gather it doesn't work for certain poses anyway...)
>
> Now that's true but it does pin-up poses OK, something it's mostly used
> for...
Hmm... apparently there *are* people sadder than me... ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> No wonder I'm looking freaked... That Haskell doesn't parse. :-P
Well it's an extract from your code!!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
>> No wonder I'm looking freaked... That Haskell doesn't parse. :-P
>
> Well it's an extract from your code!!
It tooks like there's a character or two missing. (Clipped off the edge
of the bubble or something?) As written, it doesn't appear parsable...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>>> I was thinking more about girls casually telling people they're
>>> crampy - but hey, that too! ;-)
>>
>> It's a comfort level thing. If they mention it to you, it's usually
>> because you're *very* good friends (and I don't necessarily mean
>> romantically).
>
> That explains Faye and Martin then...
>
> I've never lived with a girl, but... is it really true they become
> psychotic once a month? Or is that a myth?
>
Depends on the girl. Some, yes. Others, no.
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> I've never lived with a girl, but... is it really true they become
> psychotic once a month?
I could ask, "Only once a month?"
<ducks>
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:39:53 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>> I was thinking more about girls casually telling people they're crampy
>>> - but hey, that too! ;-)
>>
>> It's a comfort level thing. If they mention it to you, it's usually
>> because you're *very* good friends (and I don't necessarily mean
>> romantically).
>
> That explains Faye and Martin then...
>
> I've never lived with a girl, but... is it really true they become
> psychotic once a month? Or is that a myth?
IME, mostly a myth.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I've never lived with a girl, but... is it really true they become
>> psychotic once a month?
>
> I could ask, "Only once a month?"
>
> <ducks>
Oh no - some people are just permanently nuts, male or female! ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible escribió:
> Except... hmm... currently Tim is doing some random arc unrelated to
> anything else, which I'm not enjoying very much. Pitty.
Did you vote? :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers escribió:
> http://www.basicinstructions.net
>
> Do you really think the drawings are necessary for this? Although they
> are enjoyable, I would read it if it were just the dialog and commentary :)
I remember a comic without the drawings. Just a pair of balloons.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
>> I've never lived with a girl, but... is it really true they become
>> psychotic once a month? Or is that a myth?
>
> IME, mostly a myth.
Maybe inconsistent, but certainly not a myth.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran schrieb:
> "Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 47f9f5da$1@news.povray.org...
>> Damn. If only to have talent...
>
> You only need Powerpoint.
> Here's another one.
>
It's fun really! I wanted to see that no-see girl again, so here we
go... (Can be continued)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'invisible_me_mizi1.jpg' (40 KB)
Preview of image 'invisible_me_mizi1.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Chambers escribió:
>> http://www.basicinstructions.net
>>
>> Do you really think the drawings are necessary for this? Although
>> they are enjoyable, I would read it if it were just the dialog and
>> commentary :)
>
> I remember a comic without the drawings. Just a pair of balloons.
I stumbled(tm) on this today: http://compsoc.dur.ac.uk/whitespace/
That we have had a few comics here without the characters being visible,
makes this somewhat relevant. And it mentions Haskell. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:15:20 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> I've never lived with a girl, but... is it really true they become
>>> psychotic once a month? Or is that a myth?
>>
>> IME, mostly a myth.
>
> Maybe inconsistent, but certainly not a myth.
Well, it varies from person to person, certainly.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Except... hmm... currently Tim is doing some random arc unrelated to
>> anything else, which I'm not enjoying very much. Pitty.
>
> Did you vote? :)
Nah.
It's almost like "hey, my comic is just getting to some really
interesting stuff... ah, screw it, I can't be bothered any more. Let's
go do something completely random and unrelated just for a laugh."
Ah well, never mind.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> http://www.vgcats.com/comics/
> http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/
> http://www.sinfest.net/
> http://www.megatokyo.com/
> http://ars.userfriendly.org/
> http://www.myextralife.com/
> http://fanboys-online.com/index.php
> http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/index.php
> http://www.applegeeks.com/index.php
> http://www.misfile.com/
> http://www.phdcomics.com/comics.php
> http://www.snafu-comics.com/index.php
> http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/darthsanddroids/archive.html
>
> Besides xkcd and qc, that is.
Hmm. Well I was beginning to *think* I was some kind of web comic
addict. However, having surfed almost all of the above, I failed to find
any of them addictive. So maybe it's just that the few comics I've
happened across are just particularly appealing to my particular brain
dysfunction?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible escribió:
> It's almost like "hey, my comic is just getting to some really
> interesting stuff... ah, screw it, I can't be bothered any more. Let's
> go do something completely random and unrelated just for a laugh."
Well, it also gave him an accurate measure of how many people are
interested (there were 40k votes).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> It's almost like "hey, my comic is just getting to some really
>> interesting stuff... ah, screw it, I can't be bothered any more. Let's
>> go do something completely random and unrelated just for a laugh."
>
> Well, it also gave him an accurate measure of how many people are
> interested (there were 40k votes).
A simple hit counter does that too. ;-)
[So you remember hit counters? Those used to be all the rage back in the
1990s. Seems nobody's using them these days...]
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible escribió:
> [So you remember hit counters? Those used to be all the rage back in the
> 1990s. Seems nobody's using them these days...]
They are just not shown on the actual page. Of course they take stats in
the background.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> [So you remember hit counters? Those used to be all the rage back in
>> the 1990s. Seems nobody's using them these days...]
>
> They are just not shown on the actual page. Of course they take stats in
> the background.
Oh, sure, everybody has Webalyser or something now. But once upon a
time, it was cool and trendy to have a little hit counter at the bottom
of your page showing everybody how many trillion hits your page has had.
It seems so tacky now... ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> So when are you going to start drawing your own webcomic?
This was the best I could come up with...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'eq1.pdf' (32 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
> 1. Load up power point
> 2. Draw some squares
> 3. Draw some callout boxes
> 4. Select a nice font
> 5. Type some stuff
Hey, wait a sec... Why have they removed the "insert formula" option in
Office 2003? o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:47fccb9d@news.povray.org...
>>> [So you remember hit counters? Those used to be all the rage back in the
>>> 1990s. Seems nobody's using them these days...]
>>
>> They are just not shown on the actual page. Of course they take stats in
>> the background.
>
> Oh, sure, everybody has Webalyser or something now.
Our company has used TheCounter.com for many years now for stats, we
used it when it was free and then they started charging (without checking)
$17 per year. It's quite good.
But once upon a
> time, it was cool and trendy to have a little hit counter at the bottom of
> your page showing everybody how many trillion hits your page has had. It
> seems so tacky now... ;-)
Yeah, I remember those days, but I still see loads of sites using them.
~Steve~
>
> --
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
> http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> But once upon a
>> time, it was cool and trendy to have a little hit counter at the bottom of
>> your page showing everybody how many trillion hits your page has had. It
>> seems so tacky now... ;-)
>
> Yeah, I remember those days, but I still see loads of sites using them.
Heh. Every now and then a Google result leads me to an old site with
lots of 16-colour animated GIFs and table layouts... Damn it looks so
ancient by modern standards! Heh.
(And then, sometimes I visit *my* website. And it looks even lamer!)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:47fce3f6$1@news.povray.org...
>>> But once upon a
>>> time, it was cool and trendy to have a little hit counter at the bottom
>>> of your page showing everybody how many trillion hits your page has had.
>>> It seems so tacky now... ;-)
>>
>> Yeah, I remember those days, but I still see loads of sites using
>> them.
>
> Heh. Every now and then a Google result leads me to an old site with lots
> of 16-colour animated GIFs and table layouts... Damn it looks so ancient
> by modern standards! Heh.
LOL! You mean the ones with a starry background and a cursor with
letters/whatever trailing? Heh... :)
>
> (And then, sometimes I visit *my* website. And it looks even lamer!)
Hey, it's a start! ;)
~Steve~
>
> --
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
> http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> Apparently there's something wrong with my brain. It seems I find all
>> web comics insanely addictive. And, perhaps understandably, I keep
>> thinking everybody else finds them similarly fascinating too. I keep
>> forgetting that not everybody is abnormal like me...
>
> I read a lot of webcomics. I just don't spam them here. :)
>
> If you want addictive webcomics, here are the ones I follow actively:
>
> http://www.vgcats.com/comics/
> http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/
> http://www.sinfest.net/
> http://www.megatokyo.com/
> http://ars.userfriendly.org/
> http://www.myextralife.com/
> http://fanboys-online.com/index.php
> http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/index.php
> http://www.applegeeks.com/index.php
> http://www.misfile.com/
> http://www.phdcomics.com/comics.php
> http://www.snafu-comics.com/index.php
> http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/darthsanddroids/archive.html
>
> Besides xkcd and qc, that is.
>
I haven't read Misfile in a while, I should go back through the archive
and pick up where ever I left off.
If you like stories like that, or just really outside the accepted norm
stories, may I suggest:
http://www.thewotch.com/
http://www.wapsisquare.com/
http://www.abstractgender.com/ all but dead without an artist now
http://elgoonishshive.com/
less safe for work
http://queer.comicgenesis.com/
http://venusenvy.comicgenesis.com/
and then for the even more unsafe for work, and by that I mean don't
read these at work at all:
http://www.tmi-comic.com/
and not a webcomic but a web novel
http://www.talesofmu.com/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmm.
http://www.drowtales.com/mainarchive.php
http://www.clanofthecats.com/
http://www.errantstory.com/
http://www.ozfoxes.com/fauxpas.htm
http://www.megatokyo.com/
http://www.misfile.com/
http://strangecandy.keenspace.com/
http://www.ozyandmillie.org/
http://www.reallifecomics.com/
http://shifters.keenspace.com/
http://www.egoworks.com/talltails/main.html - This one irritated me when
it didn't show the *current* page right, and its worse now imho, since
you have to download the entire "book" for each one.
http://2kinds.com/
http://www.userfriendly.org/
http://abbysagency.us/
http://www.aliendice.com/
http://www.shivae.net/pure/ - When it is updating.
http://www.cyantian.net/akaelae/
http://www.cyantian.net/csafari
http://www.cyantian.net/gchall/ - When it is updating.
http://www.cyantian.net/tales/ - When it is updating.
http://www.cyantian.net/noangel - When it is updating.
http://www.cyantian.net/sinkswim - When it is updating.
All of the last 6 are interconnected parts of the "Cyantian Chronicals".
Oh, and one that is "not" work friendly, even close:
http://kitnkayboodle.comicgenesis.com/
--
void main () {
If Schrödingers_cat is alive or version > 98 {
if version = "Vista" {
call slow_by_half();
call DRM_everything();
}
call functional_code();
}
else
call crash_windows();
}
<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Oh, and one that is "not" work friendly, even close:
If you want not-work-safe, check out http://www.pholph.com/
My favorite scene: Author posts a note he'll be away a couple weeks.
In-strip narrator does a bit of ritual human sacrifice so he can talk to
the audience without the artist interfering. Which you only see if you
mouse-over the comic. Which goes away when the artist gets back.
The guy has a pretty sick imagination, altho it seems to have run down
some and gotten kind of lame. The earlier arcs were edgier, and the
latest one isn't bad, but ...
If the first strip is disturbing, I'd suggest not continuing.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <47fd989e@news.povray.org>, dne### [at] sanrrcom says...
> Patrick Elliott wrote:
> > Oh, and one that is "not" work friendly, even close:
>
> If you want not-work-safe, check out http://www.pholph.com/
>
> My favorite scene: Author posts a note he'll be away a couple weeks.
> In-strip narrator does a bit of ritual human sacrifice so he can talk to
> the audience without the artist interfering. Which you only see if you
> mouse-over the comic. Which goes away when the artist gets back.
>
> The guy has a pretty sick imagination, altho it seems to have run down
> some and gotten kind of lame. The earlier arcs were edgier, and the
> latest one isn't bad, but ...
>
> If the first strip is disturbing, I'd suggest not continuing.
>
>
A lot of times I go for the art more than anything else. If it doesn't
look good, its too distracting for me, and I lose interest in the comic
fast. This one isn't too bad. Might be worth adding to my comic list.
--
void main () {
If Schrödingers_cat is alive or version > 98 {
if version = "Vista" {
call slow_by_half();
call DRM_everything();
}
call functional_code();
}
else
call crash_windows();
}
<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
...now I understand what they meant by "there aren't enough web comics
already". o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez escribió:
> Eero Ahonen escribió:
>> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> OK, so #1: I finished reading the entire archive now. Woah, am I an
>>> official addict now or what? :-S
>> Thanks a lot, I'm going on #135 now... :P
>
> He got me reading it too <.<
Just reached #500, time to go do something productive.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> and then for the even more unsafe for work, and by that I mean don't
> read these at work at all:
> http://www.tmi-comic.com/
Why did you have to mention this? I spent 3 1/2 hours last night going
through the archives!
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez escribió:
> Just reached #500, time to go do something productive.
Heh, things got interesting after #500... Now at #660.
And impressively I'm also progressing in the "productive stuff"...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>
> Just reached #500, time to go do something productive.
#326, I think I've been doing something productive.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Heh, things got interesting after #500... Now at #660.
Enjoy #666 for me. ;-)
> And impressively I'm also progressing in the "productive stuff"...
OK, that *is* pretty impressive actually...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible escribió:
>> Heh, things got interesting after #500... Now at #660.
>
> Enjoy #666 for me. ;-)
>
>> And impressively I'm also progressing in the "productive stuff"...
>
> OK, that *is* pretty impressive actually...
The strange thing is that last week I couldn't get anything done. This
week I read the comic *and* did useful stuff :\
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> The strange thing is that last week I couldn't get anything done. This
> week I read the comic *and* did useful stuff :\
Don't be too hard on yourself, it could happen to anyone.
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers escribió:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> The strange thing is that last week I couldn't get anything done. This
>> week I read the comic *and* did useful stuff :\
>
> Don't be too hard on yourself, it could happen to anyone.
I'm not being hard on myself. It just makes little sense that I got a
new distraction (thanks to the newsgroup mascot) yet got more productive.
But if I think "hey, getting distractions *makes me* more productive",
probably that won't work well... (the whole "correlation does not imply
causation" thing)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://qdb.us/160622
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> http://qdb.us/160622
...I don't get it :(
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> > http://qdb.us/160622
> ...I don't get it :(
You clearly haven't been reading QC.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> ...I don't get it :(
>
> You clearly haven't been reading QC.
Hannelore Ellicot-Chantham. OCD sufferer. Likes cleaning things, and
counting things. Also into stalking people. Shy, nervous, and
occasionally terrifyingly assertive...
Damn, Hanners is SWEET! :-D
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> >> ...I don't get it :(
> >
> > You clearly haven't been reading QC.
> Hannelore Ellicot-Chantham. OCD sufferer. Likes cleaning things, and
> counting things. Also into stalking people. Shy, nervous, and
> occasionally terrifyingly assertive...
> Damn, Hanners is SWEET! :-D
Not someone I would want to marry, though. Having to live 24/7 with
such a person would quickly get into anyone's nerves.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>
> Hannelore Ellicot-Chantham. OCD sufferer. Likes cleaning things, and
> counting things. Also into stalking people. Shy, nervous, and
> occasionally terrifyingly assertive...
>
> Damn, Hanners is SWEET! :-D
>
Without the ultimate need to clean she could be a rocky one.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Damn, Hanners is SWEET! :-D
>
> Not someone I would want to marry, though. Having to live 24/7 with
> such a person would quickly get into anyone's nerves.
Oh, sure. She's cute, but he's a bit much to take 24/7...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
