Nicolas Alvarez wrote:

>> Agreed. If it's very small we probably wouldn't even notice.
> 
> If it's big, you think we would notice either? :)

Indeed :)

Post a reply to this message

"Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
> And lo on Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:37:41 +0100, Gail Shaw sa dot com>
>
> >
> > Oh wait, I forgot. Science = Evil. Geeks are losers. Geniuses are al
> ways
> > trying to take over or destroy the world. Right. Now I got it.
>
> Hell yeah, I'm betting all the negative comments are from Jocks (not you
>
>
> Stephen) who used to shut up Geeks in their lockers and are now petrifie
> d
>
> that they're going to be zapped with Ray-Guns.
>

Say that to my face this Saturday, if you dare :)

Stephen

Post a reply to this message

> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> In fact, isn't it totally retarded that it requires cookies in the 
>> first place?
> 
> No. What's totally retarded is building statefull apps on top of HTTP. 
> Right up there with custom login forms when HTTP has a perfectly good 
> login mechanism.

Ugh. Trying to figure out how to make a Java web app with HTTP 
authentication. Looks like even if it uses HTTP auth, it *still* wants 
to stick a session ID on you (cookie or URL rewriting).

Post a reply to this message