|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Upgraded to Windows Vista, now video editing software is dead ...
Date: 11 Mar 2008 07:21:55
Message: <47d67963$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
OK,
My vista upgrade to my home computer hasn't been as smooth as the
upgrade adviser has lead me to believe. I've had to replace a couple of
important software packages, and have had to replace one piece of hardware.
Now, I've been asked to string together some video for a project my
wife's school is working on, and I go to fire up my trusty Media Studio
Pro. Crash just as it's opening, and all sorts of warnings about the
program being incompatible. No combination of compatibility options
seems to work. Grr, OK.
I think I'll move to Premiere Elements. From the looks of the
screenshots on version 4, I'll be losing very little moving from a $400
package, to a $100 package. I've been very happy with just about every
other Adobe package out there, and if it's relationship to Premiere CS3
is anything like Photoshop's respective packages, I really shouldn't be
losing much, maybe a few of the more advanced video editing features,
but it looks to be fairly feature-rich. All I really need is to produce
proper files for DVD authoring, Titling (graphical, and basic), and
maybe moving paths for some "slide show" type productions that I do from
time to time.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Upgraded to Windows Vista, now video editing software is dead ...Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; forma
Date: 11 Mar 2008 07:23:00
Message: <47d679a4$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> OK,
>
> My vista upgrade to my home computer hasn't been as smooth as the
> upgrade adviser has lead me to believe. I've had to replace a couple of
> important software packages, and have had to replace one piece of hardware.
>
> Now, I've been asked to string together some video for a project my
> wife's school is working on, and I go to fire up my trusty Media Studio
> Pro. Crash just as it's opening, and all sorts of warnings about the
> program being incompatible. No combination of compatibility options
> seems to work. Grr, OK.
>
> I think I'll move to Premiere Elements. From the looks of the
> screenshots on version 4, I'll be losing very little moving from a $400
> package, to a $100 package. I've been very happy with just about every
> other Adobe package out there, and if it's relationship to Premiere CS3
> is anything like Photoshop's respective packages, I really shouldn't be
> losing much, maybe a few of the more advanced video editing features,
> but it looks to be fairly feature-rich. All I really need is to produce
> proper files for DVD authoring, Titling (graphical, and basic), and
> maybe moving paths for some "slide show" type productions that I do from
> time to time.
Oh, yeah, my question was:
Does anyone have any experience with Premiere elements? How do you like
it? Is there anything the pro version does that would make it worthwhile
to spend extra on the pro version?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Upgraded to Windows Vista, now video editing software is dead ...
Date: 11 Mar 2008 10:22:19
Message: <47d6a3ab$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What about Windows Movie Maker?
*runs like hell*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Upgraded to Windows Vista, now video editing software is dead...
Date: 11 Mar 2008 10:26:45
Message: <47d6a4b5@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> What about Windows Movie Maker?
>
> *runs like hell*
Tried it. Didn't like it. Highly inflexible. (I mean, I thought the El
Cheapo DVD editing software that came free with my DVD drive was naff,
but THIS...)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Upgraded to Windows Vista, now video editing software is dead...
Date: 11 Mar 2008 10:38:25
Message: <47d6a771@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> What about Windows Movie Maker?
>>
>> *runs like hell*
>
> Tried it. Didn't like it. Highly inflexible. (I mean, I thought the El
> Cheapo DVD editing software that came free with my DVD drive was naff,
> but THIS...)
Used it. Sucked. And when I was done, I found out it only saved to WMV.
Spent an hour finding a converter...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Upgraded to Windows Vista, now video editing software is dead...
Date: 11 Mar 2008 10:49:19
Message: <47d6a9ff@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Used it. Sucked. And when I was done, I found out it only saved to WMV.
> Spent an hour finding a converter...
All your [data]base are belong to us...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: nemesis
Subject: Re: Upgraded to Windows Vista, now video editing software is dead...
Date: 11 Mar 2008 11:56:17
Message: <47d6b9b1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> What about Windows Movie Maker?
>>>
>>> *runs like hell*
>>
>> Tried it. Didn't like it. Highly inflexible. (I mean, I thought the El
>> Cheapo DVD editing software that came free with my DVD drive was naff,
>> but THIS...)
>
> Used it. Sucked. And when I was done, I found out it only saved to WMV.
why would you expect otherwise?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Upgraded to Windows Vista, now video editing software is dead...
Date: 11 Mar 2008 11:58:21
Message: <47d6ba2d$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>
> Used it. Sucked. And when I was done, I found out it only saved to WMV.
> Spent an hour finding a converter...
Mencoder ;).
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Warp
Subject: Re: Upgraded to Windows Vista, now video editing software is dead ...
Date: 11 Mar 2008 11:59:50
Message: <47d6ba86@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> My vista upgrade to my home computer hasn't been as smooth as the
> upgrade adviser has lead me to believe.
But why did you "upgrade"? Wasn't XP working for you for some reason?
Was there something in Vista which you really needed and which isn't
available for XP? Peer pressure? Hype?
Personally I don't see why anyone would want to "upgrade" right now.
Why not wait until it stabilishes enough, and as many software houses as
possible offer free Vista patches for their software? When in some years
you are in a situation where you simply *must* "upgrade" because there's
no other option, then maybe.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Personally I don't see why anyone would want to "upgrade" right now.
hey, people were lining up to buy a certain expensive blu-ray videogame console
which had no worthy games whatsoever on day 1 and a very bad press! People are
attracted to shiny stuff.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |