 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> Groundhog day.
>
> Again? :D Maybe I'll just drag the toaster in the bathtub ...
Please post the results on YouTube.
Oh, wait...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Groundhog day.
>
Ok, 3 in a row, so I'll have to ask. WTF?
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethis zbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
> > Groundhog day.
> >
>
> Ok, 3 in a row, so I'll have to ask. WTF?
see the movie. You'll understand and enjoy it! :)
besides, it stars Bill Murray and that can't go wrong... :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:53:32 +0200, Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> Groundhog day.
>>
>>
> Ok, 3 in a row, so I'll have to ask. WTF?
http://imdb.com/title/tt0107048/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> Groundhog day.
>>
>
> Ok, 3 in a row, so I'll have to ask. WTF?
>
You haven't seen the movie, have you?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:55:50 -0600, Mike Raiford <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>Eero Ahonen wrote:
>> Invisible wrote:
>>> Groundhog day.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, 3 in a row, so I'll have to ask. WTF?
>>
>
>You haven't seen the movie, have you?
It is showing tomorrow :)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> besides, it stars Bill Murray and that can't go wrong... :)
Er... have you *seen* Charley's Angels?
Or Ghost Busters?
Or...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:48:13 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
> Er... have you *seen* Charley's Angels?
Why did I read that as "Charley's Angles"?
> Or Ghost Busters?
Oh, now, Ghostbusters is a great movie!
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson escribió:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:48:13 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>
>> Er... have you *seen* Charley's Angels?
>
> Why did I read that as "Charley's Angles"?
Because you have been raytracing for too long.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Jim Henderson escribió:
>> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:48:13 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>>
>>> Er... have you *seen* Charley's Angels?
>>
>> Why did I read that as "Charley's Angles"?
>
> Because you have been raytracing for too long.
HE'S been raytracing too long? *I* had to reread it 6 times to figure
out the difference... o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
